The case against Barack Hussein Obama's presidency

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#1
NYP front-cover-2-19-2015.jpg

His refusal to take the responsibilities of his duties as command-in-chief are just the tip of the iceberg. Obama has sworn to "preserve, protect, and defend" the Constitution of the United States but has, on multiple occasions, abrogated and/or usurped authority from the other two branches of government and acted unilaterally and without constitutional license to effect laws and orders illegally rendered and enforced by his administration.

These acts include rewriting the healthcare law, illegally suspending aspects of the immigration laws, the voting rights laws both of states and the U.S., and has extended these actions through his administration's cabinet-level departments, enacting nearly 20,000 pages of highly restrictive regulations that not only are of questionable legality or presidential authority, but also have damaged the economy, very nearly irreparably.

On numerous occasions, he has organized conspiracies to hide the truth from the American people on such issues as Benghazi, the IRS targeting scandal, the ATF gun sting gone awry, the implementation of the healthcare law, the VA scandal, and is likely guilty of the subornation of perjury from members of his administration in testimony before Congress.

He embarrassed and harmed our relationship with one of our greatest allies, Great Britain, sending an official U.S. delegation to socialist dictator Hugo Chavez's funeral but sending no one to the great defender of liberty and freedom, former British PM Margaret Thatcher's funeral. He followed that up by sending no one to the Paris demonstration involving leaders from forty foreign nations, including Muslim President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, after the Charlie Hebdo massacre. He refused to acknowledge the faith of twenty-one Christian Egyptians beheaded by ISIS in Libya last weekend, barely if at all acknowledged the deaths of 45 Iraqi moderate Muslims when ISIS burned them to death, and continues to refuse use of the term "Islamic Terrorists."

In and of themselves, these individual allegations do not rise to the level of impeachment -- perhaps excepting the subornation of perjury. However, as a pattern of behavior and illegality, this man has proven himself unworthy to be called president, has proven himself incapable of governance, has proven himself an enemy of the Constitution and of the United States.

As such, I call for his arrest and trial for treason.

I know it will never happen. But nothing is going to change, it will only get much, much worse, with this man in the White House. Congress will do nothing, in fact, can do nothing because to do so will grind the gears of government to a halt in such a way that no governance will occur.

I pray for the intervention of Almighty God. Washington has utterly failed us, as all men do. But our nation is at stake, and it is only Him who can preserve us at this stage.
 
Last edited:
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#2
Obama has not committed treason against me, nor tried to usurp, nor tried to slay me. Therefore I will not condemn Obama to death. I will hope he do his job better and then retire.

As for impeachment, most of these issues is not possible to impeach him on by reason that either responsibility falls on others or after exposure by allowing Obama to continue on has excused him. The more relevant recent issues are but words in speeches, meetings (or lack thereof), and so forth. I do not believe those are impeachable either.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#3
Quit whining, you have like two more years, youll be fine. Then we can get some conservative idiot elected to push us back twenty years enacting policy after policy of social inequality just to appease his suckered in evangelical voterbase and you can dance and wave your arms and praise just how great that man is for 4-8 years.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,378
6,638
113
#4
Quit whining, you have like two more years, youll be fine. Then we can get some conservative idiot elected to push us back twenty years enacting policy after policy of social inequality just to appease his suckered in evangelical voterbase and you can dance and wave your arms and praise just how great that man is for 4-8 years.

:) Shoot, I'd be happy if they could just rewind the clock 8 years........from 2016 to before Obama was elected.

Which of Obama's policies trumpeted Social Equality.........uh, no, wait...........Social/Socialist/Socialism...hmmm........maybe we need to push these back too? I think the evangelicals are smart enough to not be "suckered in." But that may just be me, so.............
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,378
6,638
113
#8
Obama killed these guys? Huh...........didn't know that...........thought it was our Military that did it.

Oh, you want to give him credit cause it happened while he was President...........ok.........so let us add up all those he released from Gitmo and compare to these two.............or all those he as allowed to enter this country illegally across our unsecure borders to these two. Or all those he allows to flourish in the Cities and States across the Nation as they are radicalized to these two.

Yes, more than two terrorists have died in the last 6 years...........question is: Is America any safer now? Not in my opinion. I believe we are in far greater danger from radical Islamic terrorists than we were 6 years ago.

But, that may just be me.

but....I DO LIKE THE MEMES :)
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#9
Obama killed these guys? Huh...........didn't know that...........thought it was our Military that did it.

Oh, you want to give him credit cause it happened while he was President...........ok.........so let us add up all those he released from Gitmo and compare to these two.............or all those he as allowed to enter this country illegally across our unsecure borders to these two. Or all those he allows to flourish in the Cities and States across the Nation as they are radicalized to these two.

Yes, more than two terrorists have died in the last 6 years...........question is: Is America any safer now? Not in my opinion. I believe we are in far greater danger from radical Islamic terrorists than we were 6 years ago.

But, that may just be me.

but....I DO LIKE THE MEMES :)
Of course Obama didn't kill them, of course it was the military, that doesn't mean he didn't order the events.
Isn't the gist of all this that he won't order the military to do such things, because he doesn't use the right terms?

Yet when it is shown that he HAS ordered the military to do such things, then people say things like..

Obama killed these guys? Huh...........didn't know that...........thought it was our Military that did it.
It's like people are so intent on being anti-Obama, that when it's shown that he actually did something they favor, they say things like that above!

I just cringe at things that appear to be based on political bias.

If one wants Obama to order the death of terrorists, and it's show he has done such, then just acknowledge it...No need to say..

Obama killed these guys? Huh...........didn't know that...........thought it was our Military that did it.
Also if Obama has NOTHING to do with the death of terrorists, and it's only the military who does it, then why you mad at Obama for something he has no control over in the first place?

Sorry partisan nonsense just gets to me.
 
Mar 21, 2011
1,515
16
0
#11
Yes, Yes Obama is the problem, and everything went fine under the Bush Admin. Nothing to see here, move along Vote Number 1 Republican Party! Blah Blah Blah
 
3

3Scoreand10

Guest
#12
Yes, Yes Obama is the problem, and everything went fine under the Bush Admin. Nothing to see here, move along Vote Number 1 Republican Party! Blah Blah Blah
I really can not understand you love afair with Obama!!!
 
3

3Scoreand10

Guest
#13
Yes, Yes Obama is the problem, and everything went fine under the Bush Admin. Nothing to see here, move along Vote Number 1 Republican Party! Blah Blah Blah
Obama is anti-Israel, anti-christian, pro gay marriage , pro abortion.
Everything he stands for is evil.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,378
6,638
113
#14
QUOTE: Sorry partisan nonsense just gets to me. END QUOTE..........

Fully agree. And so much to refute.

1) If anyone believes I am a "partisan fan" of the Republicans, they have not been paying attention.
2) I did not agree with Bush when he initiated the invasion of Iraq.
3) The "shock and awe" promised was nothing but "snap, crackle......fizz"
4) There was no strategy to fight and win a war, rather a desperate search for "weapons of mass destruction" to shore up support for the invasion.
5) Given this: Once our soldiers were on the battlefield, I supported them. The Administration was clueless on how to fight and win a ground war, and it has shown true.
6) Nation building is simply a stupid use of our Military.

NOW.................

1) To try and shore up the image of Obama as an effective Commander in Chief BY ONLY comparing the number of drone strikes during the two Presidencies is a disservice to Journalistic Integrity..........and nothing more than "Partisan" smoke and mirrors......sorry. I know it is their talking points, but it in NO WAY paints a true picture contrasting the actions of the two Presidencies. That should be widely accepted as truth.

2) All one has to do is compare what each President achieved in the following areas:
a] Land, territory gained through the use of our Military forces
b] Land, territory surrendered/lost by the misuse of our Military forces

3) One must also analyze the commitment of each President to the war effort......fight against radical Islamic extremists. In my opinion, this difference is so very clear, that to not see it can only be caused by Partisan blinders being firmly attached.

4) Bush messed up getting us into a ground war(s). Obama messed up trying to get us out of said ground war(s).
5) Bush did not "complete" the Mission. Obama is not committed to even trying to complete the Mission.

Neither of these guys have been great Commanders in Chief in my opinion. However, to suggest that Obama has done a far better job as Commander in Chief is just unbelievable. When the Commander in Chief doe not EVEN engage the Military leaders responsible for planning and carrying out Military actions in the decision making process, but relies solely on the inner circle of his partisan support staff to shape our Military battle plans, is NOT the actions of an effective Commander in Chief.

Did Bush make mistakes............you betcha! Lots of them. But compared to Obama, Bush comes off looking like Eisenhower vs. Carter. Anyway............these are my thoughts only.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#15
Obama is anti-Israel, anti-christian, pro gay marriage , pro abortion.
Everything he stands for is evil.
and plus.....I hear that as much as he plays golf he shouldn't suck as bad as he does at it.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#16
The real long term lasting damage done by this kind of man is evidenced in the Supreme Court. The damage done here lasts for the lifetime of the appointees. If we cannot depend upon the court as our hope of last resort we have only one option left. A people deprived of justice will create their own.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#17
President Obama does not stand up for Jews murdered by Islamic Terrorists. President Obama does not stand up for Christians murdered by Islamic Terrorists. Is there anyone President Obama will stand up for? Ben Shapiro explains why the answer is probably 'no.'

Video: LiveLeak.com - Ben Shapiro: First They Came for the Jews
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,825
13,187
113
#18
(checks white house)

um, the case against Obama's presidency is lost.

he actually is president, by popular vote (twice), and has been for many years now.

get over it.
 
Feb 8, 2014
325
22
0
#19
Quit whining, you have like two more years, youll be fine. Then we can get some conservative idiot elected to push us back twenty years enacting policy after policy of social inequality just to appease his suckered in evangelical voterbase and you can dance and wave your arms and praise just how great that man is for 4-8 years.
Your attitude is the problem. This is the attitude that got this man elected. This is lukewarm belief. This man is a persecutor of Christians, and his actions are robbing you and your family and your friends of freedoms that they are entitled to under the law, and the only thing you can say is "quit whining?" Brilliant.

As Americans, it is our duty, our legacy, our culture, and our heritage to question the government, including the presidency. If you are not paying attention, protesting against this indecency in even the smallest of ways, by standing up against it on the internet, you are being a crappy American, and a lousy Christian, to boot. You should be ashamed of yourself. I know as a fellow American, I'm ashamed of your attitude and the complacency and apathy which it represents.
 
Feb 8, 2014
325
22
0
#20
(checks white house)

um, the case against Obama's presidency is lost.

he actually is president, by popular vote (twice), and has been for many years now.

get over it.
No. I won't get over it. I refuse to stop protesting. It's my right as an American, and if you don't like it, that's too bad for you. So far, free speech is still the law. One day, I might go to jail for telling you that you have no right to censor me, or anyone else. Today, that's not the case. If you want to censor people so bad, move to China. It's their way of life.