so, when one of the doctors heading the national virus response team says " we are counting every person who tests positive for the virus as a virus death", I am supposed to just dismiss this as no big deal??
I mean, there has to be a high death total to justify this response all the shutdowns.
and my city, Athens ga, just announced yesterday they are to post mortis test those who have " died unattended".
now, of course all this could be just rhetoric.
but, I wanted to get higher numbers, these 2 things would be a good way to reach that goal.
The question is would those
people have died apart from being infected... most doctors would state NO. that is why death by the virus is the cause of death.
Really important to look at this from a physiological/medical perspective not a conspiratorial one.
A virus will attacks the weakest part of the body, so yes it they die it is due to the virus.
You are asking for a separation of causes that is physiologically impossible that is not how the body works.
You know we have had many, many other pandemics and epidemics, what should we do .. we do not know this virus well, most likely a virus that was tampered with and engineered, what exactly is your solution.
We have no scientifically proven treatment, limited hospital beds, doctors, nurses etc.,, so are you saying that economy supersedes efforts to minimize against death?
You know the virus left to run rampant will destroy the economy too and moreover people will die and not only the older and the less than healthy.
You really trust China's numbers, do you know that people were bolted in their homes there... even when they acted so strongly and quickly most believe about 75 000 people died.
What would no mitigation have meant to a country like the USA.. no mitigation would have been a disaster.