Tonight's Presidential Debate

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#221
Nov 20, 2018
19,134
7,412
113
#221
Wow things are heating up aren't they?

'Mad with power' conservative Supreme Court justices accused of sowing 'chaos'
Hours before the Supreme Court is expected to make a landmark ruling on whether Donald Trump — or any president or ex-president — is free to break the law, a former Department of Justice official warned that the conservative wing of the court has become "mad with power."

Reacting to the court ruling on Friday that would gut the Chevron U.S.A. versus Natural Resources Defense Council standard that has been used for 40 years, Shan Wu claimed that Republican-appointed justices are taking part in a "revolution" aimed at upending decades of settled law.

In his column for the Daily Beast, he wrote the latest ruling by the "angry old men" means the "conservative majority checked off an important box in the Federalist Society’s checklist for reshaping America."

Writing, "All revolutions must start with sowing chaos, and chaos is what will ensue from the reversal of Chevron U.S.A. versus Natural Resources Defense Council, the case that established the 40-year-old precedent of giving deference to the expertise of federal agencies," Wu suggested it goes hand-in-hand with the conservative court gutting Roe v Wade just a year ago with the Dobbs decision
 
ZNP

ZNP

Well-known member
#222
Sep 14, 2020
32,991
5,782
113
#222
I was watching Steve Bannon go to prison in Danbury and I heard someone in the crowd who was chanting for possible Democratic presidential candidate that we have not considered. She was saying "AOC for President". Wouldn't that be great if they replace Joe Biden with AOC on the ticket?

Sadly Hollywood has already rejected this script as too absurd, people need to believe at least at a tiny level that what they are watching is true, otherwise even a farce will fall flat on its face. Instead I think Hollywood is going to make Ghostbusters 3 with a team of transexuals ridding NYC of evil demonic forces.
 
ZNP

ZNP

Well-known member
#223
Sep 14, 2020
32,991
5,782
113
#223
cv5 said:
Wow things are heating up aren't they?

'Mad with power' conservative Supreme Court justices accused of sowing 'chaos'
Hours before the Supreme Court is expected to make a landmark ruling on whether Donald Trump — or any president or ex-president — is free to break the law, a former Department of Justice official warned that the conservative wing of the court has become "mad with power."

Reacting to the court ruling on Friday that would gut the Chevron U.S.A. versus Natural Resources Defense Council standard that has been used for 40 years, Shan Wu claimed that Republican-appointed justices are taking part in a "revolution" aimed at upending decades of settled law.

In his column for the Daily Beast, he wrote the latest ruling by the "angry old men" means the "conservative majority checked off an important box in the Federalist Society’s checklist for reshaping America."

Writing, "All revolutions must start with sowing chaos, and chaos is what will ensue from the reversal of Chevron U.S.A. versus Natural Resources Defense Council, the case that established the 40-year-old precedent of giving deference to the expertise of federal agencies," Wu suggested it goes hand-in-hand with the conservative court gutting Roe v Wade just a year ago with the Dobbs decision
Click to expand...
I thought they already ruled on that this morning. I saw Jack Smith and Merrich Garland weeping, so I figured the ruling was out.
 
ZNP

ZNP

Well-known member
#230
Sep 14, 2020
32,991
5,782
113
#230
Susanna said:
He’s officially senile, so please elaborate what we don’t have to fear now.

He’s got at least a little more than six months left in office.
Click to expand...
Sure we don't need to be held in fear of death anymore since Jesus rose from the dead. Also we don't need to be in fear of our sins convicting us to eternal damnation in hell since Jesus shed His blood on the cross to pay the price for our sins. We also don't need to be in fear of presidents with dementia because Jesus is Lord of all and all things are under His control.
 
JohnDB

JohnDB

Well-known member
#231
Jan 16, 2021
5,819
2,280
113
#231
Susanna said:
He’s officially senile, so please elaborate what we don’t have to fear now.

He’s got at least a little more than six months left in office.
Click to expand...
Yeah....and despite Kamala Harris's wishes....she was nothing more than a DEI hire. Completely unelectable. Her negatives are sky high.

So the Dems might get close in the House, they have lost the Senate, SCOTUS, and the Presidency. A whole platform redo is necessary if they wish to be relevant instead of a third party candidate.
 
ZNP

ZNP

Well-known member
#232
Sep 14, 2020
32,991
5,782
113
#232
JohnDB said:
Yeah....and despite Kamala Harris's wishes....she was nothing more than a DEI hire. Completely unelectable. Her negatives are sky high.

So the Dems might get close in the House, they have lost the Senate, SCOTUS, and the Presidency. A whole platform redo is necessary if they wish to be relevant instead of a third party candidate.
Click to expand...
Whoa, whoa, whoa! I think Kamala has some really special talents. For example I always view her in the theater, doing Shakespeare. I can see Kamala, Pelosi and Maxine as the three witches at the start of the Macbeth play.
 
Nehemiah6

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
#233
Jul 18, 2017
24,806
13,160
113
#233
JohnDB said:
So the Dems might get close in the House, they have lost the Senate, SCOTUS, and the Presidency. A whole platform redo is necessary if they wish to be relevant instead of a third party candidate.
Click to expand...
What Christians should see in all this is God's hand of judgment against the Communist/Fascist/Racist Democrat Party. They made ABORTION their main platform, and abortion/infanticide had always been an offering to Moloch.

Even Tucker Carlson said much the same thing. And God could have struck down Joe Biden while he was on the stage, and totally wiped him off the the scene.

But the criminal Biden gang have learned nothing. It is primarily Jill and then Hunter who are egging him on to refuse stepping down. So they could be facing a much worse scenario. And for all intents and purposes, the Democratic Party is in fact irrelevant.

The fact that Trump clearly beat Biden, and then received a proper ruling from SCOTUS regarding his presidential immunity is also God's hand in reversing the pure evil that was perpetrated by the Biden regime.

So how do these Leftists respond?
Leftists Call on Biden to Drone Strike Trump in Wake of Supreme Court Immunity Ruling (infowars.com)

The Bidens should all be immediately arrested and locked up. So let's see who has the guts to do so.
 
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#235
Nov 20, 2018
19,134
7,412
113
#235
ZNP said:
I thought they already ruled on that this morning. I saw Jack Smith and Merrich Garland weeping, so I figured the ruling was out.
Click to expand...
Well.....looks like Trump cleared the last hurdle. How many puppet prosecutors and judges has that been so far? I have lost count.
 
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#236
Nov 20, 2018
19,134
7,412
113
#236
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1807788320933474481

Justice Thomas' concurrence in Trump v. U.S. is hugely significant. He questions whether Special Counsel Jack Smith's office is constitutional. "If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution. A private citizen cannot criminally prosecute anyone, let alone a former President."
 
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#238
Nov 20, 2018
19,134
7,412
113
#238
Justice Thomas launches a legal missile at AG Merrick Garland: "It is difficult to see how the Special Counsel has an office 'established by Law,' as required by the Constitution"

"...None of the statutes cited by the Attorney General appears to create an office for the Special Counsel, and especially not with the clarity typical of past statutes used for that purpose"

"...Even if the Special Counsel has a valid office, questions remain as to whether the Attorney General filled that office in compliance with the Appointments Clause"
 
Bob-Carabbio

Bob-Carabbio

Well-known member
#239
Jun 24, 2020
1,328
641
113
#239
notmyown said:
they had never seen the POTUS in that manner.
Click to expand...
WHAT was different this time compared with all the other exposure Biden has had for the last 3-1/2 years???

Personally I was surprised that he did as well as he did, as the performance dragged on.

No question (or surprise) that Trump showed better. Why Biden agreed to "debate" at all is a mystery to me!!!
 
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#240
Nov 20, 2018
19,134
7,412
113
#240
Republicans now have enough votes to charge Garland with "inherent content".
Which means arrest and incarceration.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.