-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S
The question is why a private server was being used. A SOS should know that all activity on the net would be looked into whether it was going through a private server or a governmental server. Either she didn't know, or she did it for a reason. If she did it for a reason, the question is what reason.
The first question then would be if she was in fact trying to cover up something. If so, what would she be covering? Something that did not go well with her position as SOS.
Next, what could that possibly be? Most likely, but not necessarily, private affairs in conflict with her SOS role.
What could that be? Something generating power, money, or both. Something that her SOS position made possible.
Well, that would be a start.
The first question then would be if she was in fact trying to cover up something. If so, what would she be covering? Something that did not go well with her position as SOS.
Next, what could that possibly be? Most likely, but not necessarily, private affairs in conflict with her SOS role.
What could that be? Something generating power, money, or both. Something that her SOS position made possible.
Well, that would be a start.
Last edited by a moderator:
Peacenik claiming I denied using the word "criminal" is just one of his many lies, since I did no such thing.
I was just looking at another thread (http://christianchat.com/christian-news-forum/144220-trump-won-now-what-3.html) that makes so clear in much shorter time with less rhetoric how duplicitous and deceitful he is. He claimed he could do something which he did not do while pretending he had, then asserted that someone else had appeared satisfied with his non-response when no such expression had been made.
He followed that lie up with claiming the other person had lots of time to respond because hours had passed. There was no response at all made to him after the request which peacenik did not fulfill. One response made by the other person only, to one other person, on a completely different thread, was the only activity visible to the public, so we effectively really had absolutely no idea of the other person's availability despite peacenik's grasping at straws and willfully pretending otherwise.
In fact there were no grounds for peacenik to assume he had the other's approval and there was availability of time to the other, especially given the fact that the other had not responded, gave no indication how much time they had, what else they may have been involved in, or their level of satisfaction with peacenik's deflections and lack of cooperation while refusing to do what he said he could.
The other person had also expressed approval to my post calling peacenik out on his doublespeak, and shown no level of approval to peacenik through any words to that effect, or even a like.
Peacenik then claimed in response to my refuting his lies, that he doubted I was needed as a mouthpiece for the other person, when he had repeatedly spoken for the other person without his explicit approval. In fact, peacenik was the one who introduced the other person into the discourse between the two of us, while he pretends otherwise. He has done the same with other issues at other times. He is quite dishonest all round.
I was just looking at another thread (http://christianchat.com/christian-news-forum/144220-trump-won-now-what-3.html) that makes so clear in much shorter time with less rhetoric how duplicitous and deceitful he is. He claimed he could do something which he did not do while pretending he had, then asserted that someone else had appeared satisfied with his non-response when no such expression had been made.
He followed that lie up with claiming the other person had lots of time to respond because hours had passed. There was no response at all made to him after the request which peacenik did not fulfill. One response made by the other person only, to one other person, on a completely different thread, was the only activity visible to the public, so we effectively really had absolutely no idea of the other person's availability despite peacenik's grasping at straws and willfully pretending otherwise.
In fact there were no grounds for peacenik to assume he had the other's approval and there was availability of time to the other, especially given the fact that the other had not responded, gave no indication how much time they had, what else they may have been involved in, or their level of satisfaction with peacenik's deflections and lack of cooperation while refusing to do what he said he could.
The other person had also expressed approval to my post calling peacenik out on his doublespeak, and shown no level of approval to peacenik through any words to that effect, or even a like.
Peacenik then claimed in response to my refuting his lies, that he doubted I was needed as a mouthpiece for the other person, when he had repeatedly spoken for the other person without his explicit approval. In fact, peacenik was the one who introduced the other person into the discourse between the two of us, while he pretends otherwise. He has done the same with other issues at other times. He is quite dishonest all round.
That sounds like a mistake, a really bad idea, and a useless, self-defeating gesture. I really don't think he should consult Bill in any way whatsoever, on any topic at all, especially given the fact of Bill Clinton's terms of impeachment, which state in part:
William Jefferson Clinton by such conduct warrants impeachment and trial and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
William Jefferson Clinton by such conduct warrants impeachment and trial and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
Given that William Jefferson Clinton by such conduct warrants impeachment and trial and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States, it is a wonder that any of the United States populace accepted Hillary as a contender for top executive office given her relentless defense of him. She wants the world to think she is standing by her man when he has been proclaimed an untrustworthy threat, and now they riot and commit acts of treason and violence in support of her. Do people not think these things through? Bill the impeached pedophile and Hillary the president, has such a nice ring to it, don't you think? Not.
S
I'm over and done with the entire gang of politicians. That campaigning period really needs some axing. Starting on September 1 - ending on Election Day. That should be the campaigning period. Should leave a lot of space for maniac politicians to get around with their junk lol. Uh, I think I have seen someone on here suggesting that already.
In 2000, Bill and Hillary Clinton owed millions of dollars in legal debt. Since then, they’ve earned over $130 million. Where did the money come from?
In his New York Times bestselling books Extortion and Throw Them All Out, Schweizer detailed patterns of official corruption in Washington that led to congressional resignations and new ethics laws.
In Clinton Cash, he follows the Clinton money trail, revealing the connection between their personal fortune, their “close personal friends”, the Clinton Foundation, foreign nations, and some of the highest ranks of government.
Schweizer reveals the Clinton’s troubling dealings in Kazakhstan, Colombia, Haiti, and other places at the “wild west” fringe of the global economy. In this blockbuster exposé, Schweizer merely presents the troubling facts he’s uncovered. Meticulously researched and scrupulously sourced, filled with headline-making revelations, Clinton Cash raises serious questions of judgment, of possible indebtedness to an array of foreign interests, and ultimately, of fitness for high public office. Clinton Cash Book - The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich
In his New York Times bestselling books Extortion and Throw Them All Out, Schweizer detailed patterns of official corruption in Washington that led to congressional resignations and new ethics laws.
In Clinton Cash, he follows the Clinton money trail, revealing the connection between their personal fortune, their “close personal friends”, the Clinton Foundation, foreign nations, and some of the highest ranks of government.
Schweizer reveals the Clinton’s troubling dealings in Kazakhstan, Colombia, Haiti, and other places at the “wild west” fringe of the global economy. In this blockbuster exposé, Schweizer merely presents the troubling facts he’s uncovered. Meticulously researched and scrupulously sourced, filled with headline-making revelations, Clinton Cash raises serious questions of judgment, of possible indebtedness to an array of foreign interests, and ultimately, of fitness for high public office. Clinton Cash Book - The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich