It seems the Zimmerman trial and subsequent not guilty verdict has caused some upheaval in our country, socially and probably politically. Stars banning Florida, celebrities calling for riots, Mr and Mrs Zimmerman, George's parents, unable to go home for fear of their lives and many arguements with racial overtones.
Is this just the divisive nature of man...or has there been a defining sociological moment exposed by the trial's outcome?
To me, liberalism has been defined as the racist, bankrupt ideology it is.
The news media portraying Trayvon Martin as some innocent little boy.
The purposeful and criminal withholding of evidence by the prosecution and the arrest without evidence.
While the trial did not contain racist evidence at all, the left in this country has tried to make this a racial event. The Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons, I know that is their jobs to sow racial dischord but, they do have an effect.
Not that I have talked to many african americans about this trial, but so far every one has called it a travesty. Is this small sample indicative of the ideology of african americans? Not only was there little or no evidence against Zimmerman, evidence was witheld, criminally that was on Zimmerman's favor. The trial's evidence was for Zimmerman's innocence, but..
Zimmerman was a racist ( no proof and I kinda thought if you voted for Obama, which Zimmerman did, you could not be a racist...or maybe that was if you voted against him that proved you were, I get the ignorance and bigotry mixed up sometimes )
Divisive or definitive?