It's interesting to read the posts in which people say if Cindy is unrepentant, she must not really be a Christian.
I can't remember which book of his it was (I've read a handful of them), but also interestingly (to me at least), John Bevere writes in one of his books that the times he preached the most "on fire" sermons for God were when he himself was going through his most severe times of being addicted to pornography. The more and more he looked at it, the more he would preach to people about "eradicating sin" from their lives and being "holy".
I was thinking about a guy I knew once who was always telling people what they needed to do in order to follow Jesus and live a Christian life (he would even say that he saw himself as a teacher.) Then he would talk about watching porn everyday and his struggles with lust... He said he wasn't proud of it but he also wasn't all that concerned about it because "men are just built that way--we're visual" and "besides, God understands." Was he really a Christian? Where is the line?
I've also had friends who were refused leadership positions in their church--because they were smokers who were seen as being caught up in unrepentant sin, and therefore, in the church's eyes, unfit to lead anyone else.
I've seen in my own life that for some people, the deeper in sin they are, the more judgmental and preachy they become with other people. This often makes makes me raise both eyebrows when I run into S.A.P.'s (Self-Appointed Preachers/Prophets, in Seoulspeak.)
Cinder, as usual, you brought up very good points (in regards to some adopting children and their stories being misread.) In this case, Cindy recently gave birth to a child, and the father was presumably the man she lives with.
Lynx--I've often thought I should just stop giving examples at all, but I've seen threads that just ask a question and then everyone says, "What the hee haw are you talking about? Can you elaborate on that a little more?" Unfortunately, it seems to be a no-win situation.