ALERT: THE VACCINE MIGHT BE THE MARK OF THE BEAST

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

KT88

Guest
I hope that everyone on here recalls that I said that often two disinformation agents will often work in tandem
And we Branch Covidians hope you will have Saint Paul like epiphany on the road to Da-Mask-Us.

:LOL:
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
38,816
15,535
113
Reading the ingredient list is like looking at the side of a cereal box, except that you need a degree in organic chemistry to understand it.
You need the same to decipher the ingredients on many cereal boxes as well ;) Speaking of which, all those multi-syllable unpronounceable words on popular cereal boxes are not exactly a ringing endorsement of vaccines, when many cereals list sugar as the second or third ingredient, which contributes to several chronic diseases. Sugar! And that is something we can all pronounce, understand, and largely know the source of. Breakfast cereals often have misleading health claims printed on the box. Okay, derail end :D
 
S

Scribe

Guest
You need the same to decipher the ingredients on many cereal boxes as well ;) Speaking of which, all those multi-syllable unpronounceable words on popular cereal boxes are not exactly a ringing endorsement of vaccines, when many cereals list sugar as the second or third ingredient, which contributes to several chronic diseases. Sugar! And that is something we can all pronounce, understand, and largely know the source of. Breakfast cereals often have misleading health claims printed on the box. Okay, derail end :D
"The vaccine includes plain old sugar, also called sucrose. It’s acting here as a cryoprotectant to safeguard the nanoparticles when they’re frozen and stop them from sticking together. "

I think we are talking about such small amounts in a vaccine dosage it can't be compared to the harm from a high sugar diet.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
38,816
15,535
113
"The vaccine includes plain old sugar, also called sucrose. It’s acting here as a cryoprotectant to safeguard the nanoparticles when they’re frozen and stop them from sticking together. "

I think we are talking about such small amounts in a vaccine dosage it can't be compared to the harm from a high sugar diet.
Yeah, I was talking about sugar in cereals, just as a bit of an aside regarding how unhealthy most cereals are, which was a bit of a derail ;) Just to say, comparing the ingredients to cereal box listings is not a ringing endorsement of vaccines :D
 
S

Scribe

Guest
First off, Zerohedge is not only waaay more reliable than any site you post from, but is a news aggregate site. Meaning it gets most of its reported news stories from other news from around the world. Yes, it may put its own take on it, but at least it’s honest about it, unlike msm, and it doesn’t alter the facts of the story.


More importantly, saying you are against forced vaccination was NOT the question!!!!


The question in this instance was about refusing public transportation or medical care if someone chooses to not get the poison.


You slyly avoided that question.
Every story that I have seen posted by a user on CC from Zerohedge that I read had grossly altered the facts of the story. Every single one. Which is why I don't even read them anymore. Not a one was honest reporting. Some were out right lies, most were taking a partial truth and then interpreting it to mean something other than what was said. For example quoting statements about how 75% of people in the clinical trials had experienced severe adverse affects and that it was unsafe. When in reality 75% experienced adverse affects which are mild fevers, head aches muscles aches, but this was considered normal and a sign that the immune system was reacting and creating antibodies, and this is SAFE. To say it is unsafe because of these reactions is a lie. But this is the kind of lies in all of the reports from ZeroHedge so I don't read them anymore.
Zero Hedge is blacklisted on Reddit. LOL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

Be informed. :)
 

Genipher

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2019
1,212
965
113
Every story that I have seen posted by a user on CC from Zerohedge that I read had grossly altered the facts of the story. Every single one. Which is why I don't even read them anymore. Not a one was honest reporting. Some were out right lies, most were taking a partial truth and then interpreting it to mean something other than what was said. For example quoting statements about how 75% of people in the clinical trials had experienced severe adverse affects and that it was unsafe. When in reality 75% experienced adverse affects which are mild fevers, head aches muscles aches, but this was considered normal and a sign that the immune system was reacting and creating antibodies, and this is SAFE. To say it is unsafe because of these reactions is a lie. But this is the kind of lies in all of the reports from ZeroHedge so I don't read them anymore.
Zero Hedge is blacklisted on Reddit. LOL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

Be informed. :)
Is any news source unbiased or 100% honest these days? We could probably find a reason to distrust every single source out there.
 

SophieT

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2020
4,245
2,378
113
Yeah, that is one reason why multinational pharmaceutical companies are so vilified by many.

And it is no secret they are trying very hard to gain legal ownership of water o_O

They even tried to squash the organics' industry, and convinced our government at one point that we were not qualified to diagnose whether or not we needed Vitamin C, and our government was threatening to have it removed from store shelves as a result, and make us go to the doctor (when our health cars system is-by many accounts- already over-burdened) to get a prescription for a measly 5 mg if we wanted to take Vitamin C :oops::censored::rolleyes: When I am taking Vitamin C, I take 1k mgs at a time :D:giggle:

It did cause me to wonder where such madness would end... doc appts and prescriptions for water?

PS~ thankfully this initiative was squashed due to the great outcry that arose from the public sector :)(y):)

I collected over 70 signatures in protest, also :D

PS~ 20 pages behind is where I landed when I clicked the link for this thread :unsure:

Legal ownership of water? Squash Vitamin C? I am unaware of those things...when did that happen?

We are really more about prevention then prescriptions, so take a few different things especially right now of course.

20 pages behind? This thread is rip roaring along! :giggle:
 

Genipher

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2019
1,212
965
113
Legal ownership of water? Squash Vitamin C? I am unaware of those things...when did that happen?

We are really more about prevention then prescriptions, so take a few different things especially right now of course.

20 pages behind? This thread is rip roaring along! :giggle:
Hmmm. Well I know if you buy land you don't always get the water rights and some states say it's "illegal" to use a water catchment system. Maybe that's what "legal ownership of water" means?
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
10,399
6,756
113
Every story that I have seen posted by a user on CC from Zerohedge that I read had grossly altered the facts of the story. Every single one. Which is why I don't even read them anymore. Not a one was honest reporting. Some were out right lies, most were taking a partial truth and then interpreting it to mean something other than what was said. For example quoting statements about how 75% of people in the clinical trials had experienced severe adverse affects and that it was unsafe. When in reality 75% experienced adverse affects which are mild fevers, head aches muscles aches, but this was considered normal and a sign that the immune system was reacting and creating antibodies, and this is SAFE. To say it is unsafe because of these reactions is a lie. But this is the kind of lies in all of the reports from ZeroHedge so I don't read them anymore.
Zero Hedge is blacklisted on Reddit. LOL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

Be informed. :)
THIS, is exactly what I'm talking about.

Who the hell says Wikipedia is unbiased for God's Sake!!?
 

Genipher

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2019
1,212
965
113
It did cause me to wonder where such madness would end... doc appts and prescriptions for water?
:unsure:
Reminds me of The Lorax:

In Thneedville, the air is not so clean.
So we buy it fresh.
IT COMES OUT THIS MACHINE!
It's Satisfactions-guaranteed-ville!


bottle of air.jpg
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
10,399
6,756
113
I don't understand the question. I got an xray from a clinic on my hand yesterday. The nurse said they got the Moderna vaccine in and she is not sure that she will take it because of it being new technology. She said no one in her chain of clinics or anyone in the city hospitals that she knows of is being told that it will be mandatory.

So what if scenarios aside, lets see what happens. I support peoples rights to sue their businesses if told that they will be terminated for not getting a vaccine. I doubt there will that many attempt to force vaccines on their employees. I am sure it will happen and we will hear about the court cases that will then be filed as a result and it will be interesting to see how it all pans out.
I truly pray you are right.

I'd bet the ranch you are wrong.
 

SophieT

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2020
4,245
2,378
113
Hmmm. Well I know if you buy land you don't always get the water rights and some states say it's "illegal" to use a water catchment system. Maybe that's what "legal ownership of water" means?
Really do not know. We have a well and had one before also. Great water the first time but need treatment for hard water this time. Still, lots of water.
 

Genipher

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2019
1,212
965
113
Really do not know. We have a well and had one before also. Great water the first time but need treatment for hard water this time. Still, lots of water.
Ah, I would love to have a well!
My dad had one and it made my hair soooo soft. What a difference from city water!
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
38,816
15,535
113
Legal ownership of water? Squash Vitamin C? I am unaware of those things...when did that happen?

We are really more about prevention then prescriptions, so take a few different things especially right now of course.

20 pages behind? This thread is rip roaring along! :giggle:
Yes to both. The Vitamin C thing happened here in Canada quite a few years ago. Maybe about 30? Um, yeah, my memory is a bit foggy sometimes, heehee, with my advancing age (that's my excuse and it's sticking to me! :sneaky::giggle:). But it would have been around the time, the only time, I was considering leaving the profession I had been in for many years (all my adult life) to study and practice alternative health methods, and that was the late 80s/early 90s. Things like that Vitamin C thing happening did not make such a change look very appealing/promising, so I stayed where I was :)

And the water ownership thing? Yeah, Monsanto tried that in South America; the Bolivian government allowed it (of course they get paid mega big bucks to do so) but it ended badly because the people rose up and revolted against the disgusting scheme which included not allowing the citizens to collect rain water. I doubt Monsanto will stop there.

In Cochabamba, Bolivia, the people, led by union leader Oscar Olivera, forced the giant engineering company Bechtel, a globalist partner of Monsanto, to leave the country and stopped a World Bank imposed privatization scheme that more than doubled the price of water to the local people. The mainstream press was, of course, reluctant to tell this story. It's hard to even describe the evil of Monsanto in a brief article. source
 
S

Scribe

Guest
THIS, is exactly what I'm talking about.

Who the hell says Wikipedia is unbiased for God's Sake!!?
There are many, many people involved in editing, correcting, citing sources. I like how it works. Mistakes are discovered faster and corrected faster than the set of books we used to use growing up. It is getting better every year are more and more academically qualified people participate in making it accurate and include sources and links to data I never knew existed on the internet.

There is no comparison to how Wikipedia works and zerohedge.

I guess if someone sees a conspiracy behind Wikipedia then there is no use explaining how Wikipedia works. If they wanted to find out they could read about it.

I believe Wikipedia has built into it a good method for verifying information, citing sources, correcting errors and having so many people involved world wide that it is one of the best methods for collecting knowledge today. Not just the articles, but the sources cited so that you can follow a never ending trail of credible sources for any subject you are interested in. It is not perfect but in my opinion it is more credible than the sets of books we used growing up. Those books had errors that never got corrected.
 

3angelsmsg

Junior Member
Mar 1, 2018
514
595
93
Every story that I have seen posted by a user on CC from Zerohedge that I read had grossly altered the facts of the story. Every single one. Which is why I don't even read them anymore. Not a one was honest reporting. Some were out right lies, most were taking a partial truth and then interpreting it to mean something other than what was said. For example quoting statements about how 75% of people in the clinical trials had experienced severe adverse affects and that it was unsafe. When in reality 75% experienced adverse affects which are mild fevers, head aches muscles aches, but this was considered normal and a sign that the immune system was reacting and creating antibodies, and this is SAFE. To say it is unsafe because of these reactions is a lie. But this is the kind of lies in all of the reports from ZeroHedge so I don't read them anymore.
Zero Hedge is blacklisted on Reddit. LOL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

Be informed. :)
It is fake news. A vaccinne takes decades to be developed. 7 years for the earliest and the average years to 20 years. We in the past had 7 different coronavirus and not 1 vaccine was developed that is effective 100 %. The flu vaccinne a good year would be 40% effective. And how come, the scientists not develope a vaccine for aids. Because if we hear the news of television we believe the lies. What is really different about this coronavirus. This is fear tactics being used to manipulate the masses. I rather stay in the word of God and learn lessons from nature than to trust in humans for solving to sickness and disease. All false hope and lies from the father of lies. They are trying to work miracles or counterfeit God's miracles.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
It is fake news. A vaccinne takes decades to be developed. 7 years for the earliest and the average years to 20 years. We in the past had 7 different coronavirus and not 1 vaccine was developed that is effective 100 %. The flu vaccinne a good year would be 40% effective. And how come, the scientists not develope a vaccine for aids. Because if we hear the news of television we believe the lies. What is really different about this coronavirus. This is fear tactics being used to manipulate the masses. I rather stay in the word of God and learn lessons from nature than to trust in humans for solving to sickness and disease. All false hope and lies from the father of lies. They are trying to work miracles or counterfeit God's miracles.
Welcome to the 21st century. Vaccines really only got started between the 1920s and 1940s. It is about time for a breakthrough. If this works like the trials prove it did, then you can expect more breakthroughs with mRNA in the near future. Give it a few years and we may have cured a few cancers with mRNA. ;)(y)
 
S

Scribe

Guest
It is fake news. A vaccinne takes decades to be developed. 7 years for the earliest and the average years to 20 years. We in the past had 7 different coronavirus and not 1 vaccine was developed that is effective 100 %. The flu vaccinne a good year would be 40% effective. And how come, the scientists not develope a vaccine for aids. Because if we hear the news of television we believe the lies. What is really different about this coronavirus. This is fear tactics being used to manipulate the masses. I rather stay in the word of God and learn lessons from nature than to trust in humans for solving to sickness and disease. All false hope and lies from the father of lies. They are trying to work miracles or counterfeit God's miracles.
Nothing you just said proves that the COVID 19 vaccines don't work. Failures in making effective vaccines for other viruses does not prove that no vaccines can be successful for a different virus. The COVID 19 is not the ______ flu (whichever one of the influenza viruses you name) It is not the HIV virus.
There have been many other successful vaccines for other viruses. They have almost eliminated polio. I think there were 33 cases world wide in 2018, and more in 2019, possibly due to antivaxxers scaring people.
Your logic does not work. You should be praising God that we were successful with a COVID 19 vaccine instead of complaining about it, but each person has to be responsible to answer to God for the light that they have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.