examples of speaking in tongues - need verification and explanations, please

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63


diggs, it's almost o-ver!
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I Cor. 14:4 - "He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself...." - (Hows that for translation? WHO ARE YOU SPEAKING TO? WHO IS THE SPIRIT WITNESSING TO?......if not you?)
what Spirit witnessing?
it doesn't say that!

it says if you are speaking in a language no one else knows, you're edified because YOU know what the message is...in your spirit.
God gave it to you.
so when you speak it, you are edified, CUZ YOU DIG IT.

nobody else does unless they speak the lingo or there's a translator.

LOOK:




chinese man teaching in chinese.
he is happy, edified, because he knows what he said and wrote.

but....his pupils don't understand chinese.

are they edified?
NO.

so should that teacher keep teaching them?
HOW would that edify them?

or should he BE QUIET and be edified himself by speaking to God in chinese because he and GOD know what he is saying.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
"Paul was given a special affectation, a certain dispensation of tongues."

Yet he wanted them all to surpass him. - "I would that you spoke in tongues more than me..."
Wait a minute!..........Wasn't Paul the one who said he was the Apostle to the gentiles?
If tongues were for apolistic use, he wouldn't wish such a thing for believers he knew weren't called to do it.

Kind of a quandary there .....
 
U

unclefester

Guest

You speak of the gift of tongues that you say Paul already knew. - - - - Please go back over his missionary journeys.
Each of those places had their own language.
No ... I didn't say this Rick. I'm saying that when Paul was speaking an earthly language that was unknown/unlearned to him for the sake of the gospel message, this was the true biblical gift of tongues given by God the Father to Paul.
Acts 2:7-12

[SUP]
7 [/SUP]Utterly amazed, they asked: “Aren’t all these who are speaking Galileans? [SUP]8 [/SUP]Then how is it that each of us hears them in our native language? [SUP]9 [/SUP]Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia,[SUP][a][/SUP] [SUP]10 [/SUP]Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome [SUP]11 [/SUP](both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs—we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!”[SUP]12 [/SUP]Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, “What does this mean?”

 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
what Spirit witnessing?
it doesn't say that!

it says if you are speaking in a language no one else knows, you're edified because YOU know what the message is...in your spirit.
God gave it to you.
so when you speak it, you are edified, CUZ YOU DIG IT.

nobody else does unless they speak the lingo or there's a translator.

LOOK:




chinese man teaching in chinese.
he is happy, edified, because he knows what he said and wrote.

but....his pupils don't understand chinese.

are they edified?
NO.

so should that teacher keep teaching them?
HOW would that edify them?

or should he BE QUIET and be edified himself by speaking to God in chinese because he and GOD know what he is saying.
Brilliant!

He that speaks in an unknown tongue only knows it himself. - (That's why it's an unknown tongue)

I should have seen it! - An unknown tongue ACTUALLY means the person speaking it knows it!
- Like a chinese teacher, I get it now.....it takes me awhile to catch on but.....what you are saying is that if an Epicurean was to visit a Jewish assembly he should keep quite because someone might not recognize his actual praises/worship.
Gotcha! - - - So that's the gift of tongues?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
"Paul was given a special affectation, a certain dispensation of tongues."

Yet he wanted them all to surpass him. - "I would that you spoke in tongues more than me..."
Wait a minute!..........Wasn't Paul the one who said he was the Apostle to the gentiles?
If tongues were for apolistic use, he wouldn't wish such a thing for believers he knew weren't called to do it.

Kind of a quandary there .....
1 Corinthians 14
8 For example, if a bugle doesn’t sound a clear call, who will get ready for battle? 9 In the same way, unless you speak an intelligible message with your language, how will anyone know what is being said? You’ll be talking into the air!


18I thank God that I speak in foreign languages more than all of you. 19But in church I would rather speak five words with my mind to instruct others than 10,000 words in a foreign language.

20Brothers, stop beingf childish in your thinking. Be like infants with respect to evil, but think like adults. 21In the Law it is written,

By means of foreign languages
and through the mouths of foreigners
I will speak to this people,
but even then they will not listen to me,”g
declares the Lord.

22Foreign languages, then, are meant to be a sign, not for believers, but for unbelievers


if you're speaking in tongues in private...who's getting the SIGN?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Brilliant!

He that speaks in an unknown tongue only knows it himself. - (That's why it's an unknown tongue)

I should have seen it! - An unknown tongue ACTUALLY means the person speaking it knows it!
- Like a chinese teacher, I get it now.....it takes me awhile to catch on but.....what you are saying is that if an Epicurean was to visit a Jewish assembly he should keep quite because someone might not recognize his actual praises/worship.
Gotcha! - - - So that's the gift of tongues?
kinda.
almost.

nearly there:)

the word UNKNOWN is not in the texts.
it's not an unknown language.

the tongues are only mentioned in connection with the JEWS....signs for them.

we've been through it.
but ya, that's almost it.
 
May 15, 2013
4,307
27
0
If someone truly has the gift of tongues they will be able to spread the Gospel to these people in their native tongue, and which the Gospel must be spread throughout the world. Everything that God has created has a meaning.


This was Parham's contention, (Topeka revival 1903).
That tongues were meant to do missionary work since Jesus was coming back so soon and they didn't have time to actually learn the languages, - that was 1903.
He was wrong then just as you are wrong now about tongues only being for evangelizing.

It is a wrong assumption that tongues are solely meant to spread the gospel.

"Though I speak with the tongues of angels?" - I Cor.13:1
What tribe speaks
'ANGEL'?

"He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifies himself" - I Cor.14:4
How's that?

The Gospel must be spread; What is the purpose of that what you regarded as tongue? We already know that God can communicate with us in all sorts of ways; He can even communicate with the winds and etc... Why do we believe that God has an earthly language, but He is a spirit? It says that God hear the heart. When Abel blood was spilled, God heard his cry, and how come Cain didn't hear it or try to hush up Abel blood before God comes back? Earthly language is for our earthly ears to captured, and God wasn't created from the earth and which means that He is not a earthly being. Jesus has said that His word is spiritual, but not of our perception, we have to train our ears on His word and which I've meant is we have to look for the spiritual meaning.

2 Corinthians 4:18So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.
 
U

unclefester

Guest
"Paul was given a special affectation, a certain dispensation of tongues."

Yet he wanted them all to surpass him. - "I would that you spoke in tongues more than me..."
Wait a minute!..........Wasn't Paul the one who said he was the Apostle to the gentiles?
If tongues were for apolistic use, he wouldn't wish such a thing for believers he knew weren't called to do it.

Kind of a quandary there .....
Yes ... Paul was God's chosen apostle to the gentiles. And Paul also proclaimed that if he could, he would accurse himself if it meant accomplishing Christ's salvation for more of his Jewish brethren. If more or all of Paul's gentile converts to Christianity spoke in tongues more than he, does it then not stand to reason that more of his Jewish brethren would have witnessed firsthand this sign given for the sake of those unbelieving Jews, his brethren ? No quandary here Rick. Just Paul's zealous fervour to see his brethren saved ... even though God chose to send him to us gentiles.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Yes ... Paul was God's chosen apostle to the gentiles. And Paul also proclaimed that if he could, he would accurse himself if it meant accomplishing Christ's salvation for more of his Jewish brethren. If more or all of Paul's gentile converts to Christianity spoke in tongues more than he, does it then not stand to reason that more of his Jewish brethren would have witnessed firsthand this sign given for the sake of those unbelieving Jews, his brethren ? No quandary here Rick. Just Paul's zealous fervour to see his brethren saved ... even though God chose to send him to us gentiles.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to unclefester again.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
Yes ... Paul was God's chosen apostle to the gentiles. And Paul also proclaimed that if he could, he would accurse himself if it meant accomplishing Christ's salvation for more of his Jewish brethren. If more or all of Paul's gentile converts to Christianity spoke in tongues more than he, does it then not stand to reason that more of his Jewish brethren would have witnessed firsthand this sign given for the sake of those unbelieving Jews, his brethren ? No quandary here Rick. Just Paul's zealous fervour to see his brethren saved ... even though God chose to send him to us gentiles.
"Forbid not tongues."
"He that speaketh in an unknown language edifieth himself."

Not my words, Paul's.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
Yes ... Paul was God's chosen apostle to the gentiles. And Paul also proclaimed that if he could, he would accurse himself if it meant accomplishing Christ's salvation for more of his Jewish brethren. If more or all of Paul's gentile converts to Christianity spoke in tongues more than he, does it then not stand to reason that more of his Jewish brethren would have witnessed firsthand this sign given for the sake of those unbelieving Jews, his brethren ? No quandary here Rick. Just Paul's zealous fervour to see his brethren saved ... even though God chose to send him to us gentiles.
See how you shape your argument based on your preconceived notions?
Like the infilling of the Holy Ghost is to spurn the Jews on to repent.
Like tongues is only a sign for the Jews.
Do you really think God would contradict Himself? - "An evil generation seeks a sign". - (Jesus)
They had their sign. They rejected Him. The gentile inflow into the kingdom of heaven doesn't have anything to do with any sign!
- Except that of Jonah the prophet.
Tongues are not for a sign.
 
J

jinx

Guest
how's it going on your seeking zone? finding any answers?
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
The Gospel must be spread; What is the purpose of that what you regarded as tongue? (For spirit feeding from the Father to us who are indwelled)We already know that God can communicate with us in all sorts of ways; He can even communicate with the winds and etc...(yes, donkey,fish, etc.) Why do we believe that God has an earthly language, but He is a spirit?(We don't) It says that God hear the heart.(Exactly) When Abel blood was spilled, God heard his cry, and how come Cain didn't hear it or try to hush up Abel blood before God comes back? Earthly language is for our earthly ears to captured, and God wasn't created from the earth and which means that He is not a earthly being. (You are correct)Jesus has said that His word is spiritual, but not of our perception,(He gives it to us through grace) we have to train our ears on His word and which I've meant is we have to look for the spiritual meaning. ........(Sometimes that meaning comes with groanings that can't be uttered)

2 Corinthians 4:18So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.(Amen!)
We fix our eyes not on what is seen, but what is unseen
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
how's it going on your seeking zone? finding any answers?
um...not really, jinxy
some folks are trying to respond to the vids, but mixed results.
honestly nothing i can put my trust in.
lots of subjectivity and feelings.


but going through the scriptures repeatedly strengthens my belief and trust in them.

the gifts ceased, just as they were intended to do.
nite jinxy.

 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
1 Corinthians 14
22 Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not:
Read it! Tongues are not for a sign for believers, because they already know the gift; (which they have).
Now, for those that haven't seen it,(unbelievers), it IS a sign.
- But only because they haven't seen it, or made fun of it.
Once they see it and mock it; it no longer is a sign.

 
J

jinx

Guest
um...not really, jinxy
some folks are trying to respond to the vids, but mixed results.
honestly nothing i can put my trust in.
lots of subjectivity and feelings.


but going through the scriptures repeatedly strengthens my belief and trust in them.

the gifts ceased, just as they were intended to do.
nite jinxy.

nite zone.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
Now, This is what Paul said, (not me); Paul :

I Corinthians 14


:2 "For He that speaks in an unknown tongue speaks not to men, but to God: for no man understands him; howbeit in the spirit he speaks mysteries."

:14 "For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth,but my understanding is unfruitful."

:15 "WHAT IS IT THEN? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also:

I will sing with the spirit,and I will sing with the understanding also." - (Notice the juxtaposition of spirit and rational mind)

:16 Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?

:17 For thou verily giveth thanks well, but the other is not edified.

: 18 I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than you all:

:19 Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue. (More contrast between praying in the spirit and praying with understanding)

:20 Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children(slow to hate), but in understanding be men.(grasp it!)

:21 In the law it is written, With other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that they will not hear me, saith the Lord. (reference to Isa. 28:11,12)