Sarah this ain't about picking and choosing, it is about context here. The Hebrew words “kokhve voqer” are no where in Isaiah 14:12, that fact has already been established.
Now I noticed you never answered my question Sarah, so I will ask again. Do you have an old NIV?
And if you do, have you taken a look to see if it has those same footnotes for Isaiah 14:12 and 2 Peter 1:19 which I listed in the earlier post?
If you do have an old NIV, then please look this stuff up on your own. Because it seems to me that you are searching for answers. For why I am against the NIV, and rightly so. For it is a wicked bible perversion that attempts to equate our Lord Jesus Christ with Lucifer.
The title of morning star is only given to the Lord Jesus Christ in the Scriptures. And as I showed in the previous post to Rachel, the Hebrew word Helel is also translated as Lucifer by the Earlier English Bibles. Such as the Coverdale, Geneva, Bishop's Bible, etc.
And no, the argument you are presenting Sarah would not work. Because Jesus Christ himself is making the declaration in Revelation 22:16. In the context of Revelation 22; morning star is given as a title. And our Lord Jesus Christ is declaring that He is the bright and morning star. The word the (indefinite article) is being used in Revelation 22:16, showing that morning star is given as a title. And I also pointed out already that morning star (singular) is not at all capitalized anywhere in the King James Bible. It is all lowercase.
Now I noticed you never answered my question Sarah, so I will ask again. Do you have an old NIV?
And if you do, have you taken a look to see if it has those same footnotes for Isaiah 14:12 and 2 Peter 1:19 which I listed in the earlier post?
If you do have an old NIV, then please look this stuff up on your own. Because it seems to me that you are searching for answers. For why I am against the NIV, and rightly so. For it is a wicked bible perversion that attempts to equate our Lord Jesus Christ with Lucifer.
The title of morning star is only given to the Lord Jesus Christ in the Scriptures. And as I showed in the previous post to Rachel, the Hebrew word Helel is also translated as Lucifer by the Earlier English Bibles. Such as the Coverdale, Geneva, Bishop's Bible, etc.
And no, the argument you are presenting Sarah would not work. Because Jesus Christ himself is making the declaration in Revelation 22:16. In the context of Revelation 22; morning star is given as a title. And our Lord Jesus Christ is declaring that He is the bright and morning star. The word the (indefinite article) is being used in Revelation 22:16, showing that morning star is given as a title. And I also pointed out already that morning star (singular) is not at all capitalized anywhere in the King James Bible. It is all lowercase.
It seems you're picking and choosing how you want to see it,on one hand it doesn't make a difference in the KJV but it most certainly does in the NIV. On one hand you ignore Job 38 and say it makes no difference when both say morning star(s) which would indicate by your logic that Jesus then is nothing more then an angel,but that is a OK with you,but then you turn around and say it does make a difference when in Isaiah the NIV says morning star and in Rev it say the bright Morning Star is making it say one and the same. Yet in both cases when taking those verses within the CONTEXT of the verses you can't make it say one and the same. It seems you're using flawed logic.
I do have an old NIV,the pre 1984.