I
Imperfect
Guest
You say I havnt refuted. What's there to refute. It is what it is. Nobody refuted what I said. Just rambled on ignoring everything I said and damning me to hell.
to have sex, you have to penetrate.. that is what sex is.
theres a difference between nakedness and sex.
Its not a suprise nobody is staying on subject. People are trying to educate me on something I already know. And are trying to find me guilty on something I don't even partake in. Nobo,dy wants to read. But everybody wants to judge and act like they know who they are judging and talking to.
if you ask me, technically, no. i dont think it is. its not intercourse.
im not trying to justify doing this. its just a ongoing debate.
whats your take on it?
Just to make all you holier than thou judmentalists feel silly, I want any of you to go back and point out where I said its ok because its not sex.. and ill wait for somebody to point out where I said its ok.. and ill wait.. and ill wait some more... then when somebody does reply to this post, they will present some non-sense where they twisted what I said to favor their original stance.
If God was posting in here He would tell all of you to calm down and sit down and read what's he's saying and stop making what you want out of what he's saying.
You mean "per se", i.e., by itself....I just merely said oral sex is not sex per say...
No, you're not getting it right now.And what do you mean it is intercourse if 2 people are not married. So if they are, then it isn't? Am I getting it right now? Lol