What Laws are still valid to christians

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,042
241
63
Truly I say to you, among those born of women there has not arisen one greater than John the Baptist. But the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he. Matthew 11:11​
So wouldn't the writers of the OT fall into this same category of being greater than John?
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,042
241
63
yes, but then it was prophesied that there would be a new covenant:

Jer 31:31 "Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—

which Jesus did:

Mat 26:28 For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Heb 8:13 In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
And as a covenant of salvation, you're right on. I don't dispute that.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,042
241
63
According to your interpretation of this verse, Paul will be considered one of the least in the kingdom because he taught that circumcision is nothing, and taught people to not obey the commandment. Circumcision was a commandment of GOD; it was more than just a jot or a tittle. It was the very doorway into the old covenant. Without it no man could even be a member of the house of GOD, much less try to keep its laws.
No, because Paul taught to follow the Law, as long as it was done in the right context. The places where we see him coming against the law is when people were using it for justifications sake.

I keep using the scripture in Matthew because it is affirms Jesus' stance on the Law. No where does He say to not follow the law. It's obviously not for salvation because He says both those who do and those who don't are saved. No one really wants to address Jesus telling His followers to follow the law, except to say that he probably meant the Spirit.
So when you consider that Paul is coming against law keepers who did it for justification, a keeping of the 7th day sabbath or eating kosher or getting circumcised is completely acceptable.
 
M

Married_Richenbrachen

Guest
No, because Paul taught to follow the Law, as long as it was done in the right context. The places where we see him coming against the law is when people were using it for justifications sake.

I keep using the scripture in Matthew because it is affirms Jesus' stance on the Law. No where does He say to not follow the law. It's obviously not for salvation because He says both those who do and those who don't are saved. No one really wants to address Jesus telling His followers to follow the law, except to say that he probably meant the Spirit.
So when you consider that Paul is coming against law keepers who did it for justification, a keeping of the 7th day sabbath or eating kosher or getting circumcised is completely acceptable.
You're arguing from the silence of scripture. None of the scriptures say "it is good to keep the law as far as we are able, but because we love God and not for salvation".
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
So when you consider that Paul is coming against law keepers who did it for justification, a keeping of the 7th day sabbath or eating kosher or getting circumcised is completely acceptable.
well this is awkward...
umm...why be circumcised?
if you raise sons according to your beliefs now - would you have them circumcised?
if so, it would be according to your beliefs...right? which are religious.
which means you think it is pleasing to God or required.

or no:confused:

Paul said it avails nothing.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
So the writers of the Old Testament didn't receive as much revelation from God as the writers of the New?
the NT writers received more:)

Galatians 5
1It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery. 2Behold I, Paul, say to you that if you receive circumcision, Christ will be of no benefit to you
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
So wouldn't the writers of the OT fall into this same category of being greater than John?
wasn't Jesus saying John was the greatest of the OT prophets? - he was their last - Elijah come to call out the children - away from the Old.

and yet the least after John are greater - why?
all are one in Christ.

Galatians 5
It was for freedom that Christ set us free.

John 8:36
So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.

2 Corinthians 3:17
Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I can help clarify the matter for you. I'm not in either place.:)

Again, Jesus told His disciples very plainly they were to follow the Law. Whether you think that it pleases God or not, or even if it should, it ultimately doesn't matter because Jesus told us to follow the law.
Then you should agree.

we should not only be circumcising our children. But we should be having levitical priests, Meeting on Saterday, Celebrating the passover meals and the other cerminonies according to law. And while we are at it. Where is the temple and the animals to sacrifice?

The law came as a whole. not a part. When jesus said obey my commands, He is not speaking of law. He is speaking of the things he told them to do. And taught them for the three years he was with them, as well as the moral guidance he gave them, such as in matt 5.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Question: Re-Uploaded any help is appreciated :)
For the children of Israel. In accordance with the covenant God made with them (not the one to save them, but for God to be their God and they be his earthly children, Live in their land, be blessed by him) forever means forever.. Or at least until the earth no longer exists, at which time, there is no more land to be blessed in.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
So wouldn't the writers of the OT fall into this same category of being greater than John?
not according to the vs.

Any man born of a woman would include ALL OT writers.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
691
113
Nope, wrong again. My faith in his grace is what pleases Him. My obedience to His commands in part shows I love Him. I'm still not saying my works affect my salvation. Never once have I said that.
Then what good are the works of law you do? You say they are not for salvation or to please GOD (which he's not pleased with anyways). Do you do them to please yourself?
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
691
113
So wouldn't the writers of the OT fall into this same category of being greater than John?
What did Jesus say? He said that John was greater than anyone born of a woman, which includes every human being existing in his time and before him except for Christ and Adam/Eve.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
691
113
No, because Paul taught to follow the Law, as long as it was done in the right context. The places where we see him coming against the law is when people were using it for justifications sake.
So following the law is not for justification, or salvation, or to please GOD, but we are to follow the law as long it is the right context. What is that context?

I keep using the scripture in Matthew because it is affirms Jesus' stance on the Law. No where does He say to not follow the law. It's obviously not for salvation because He says both those who do and those who don't are saved. No one really wants to address Jesus telling His followers to follow the law, except to say that he probably meant the Spirit.
So when you consider that Paul is coming against law keepers who did it for justification, a keeping of the 7th day sabbath or eating kosher or getting circumcised is completely acceptable.
Jesus taught the proper way to 'follow' the law: faith, which follows the spirit instead of the letter.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
So following the law is not for justification, or salvation, or to please GOD, but we are to follow the law as long it is the right context. What is that context?
We obey the Law to please God...

1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.


Jesus taught the proper way to 'follow' the law: faith, which follows the spirit instead of the letter.
Can you obey the Spirit while breaking the letter? Of course not.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,042
241
63
You're arguing from the silence of scripture. None of the scriptures say "it is good to keep the law as far as we are able, but because we love God and not for salvation".
Because I know from the countless verses in the Bible that I can't earn my salvation. It's simply through grace by faith, not of myself. That's the foundational truth.

Yet Jesus tells us in Matthew 5 to follow the Law. I may not understand completely the relationship between the 2, but I know its there.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,042
241
63
well this is awkward...
umm...why be circumcised?
if you raise sons according to your beliefs now - would you have them circumcised?
if so, it would be according to your beliefs...right? which are religious.
which means you think it is pleasing to God or required.

or no:confused:

Paul said it avails nothing.
It's a sign of my wife and I's desire to be obedient to God's instruction.
It will be a physical sign, a physical reminder to my sons of that truth.
It's healthier to do it.
It's, ahem..... more aesthetic.:eek:

It's according to God laying that on our hearts, not just religious beliefs. An example....
Scripture says to do it on the 8th day, just like Jesus did. We took our son in to have it done, but there was a medical issue that kept us from doing it. Were my wife and I or my son in sin because it wasn't done on the 8th day? Did God frown upon us? Or is that circumcision a sign of something much deeper, much truer, that isn't dependent on that physical act? Absolutely. But that doesn't negate the physical commandment.

And regarding Paul's teaching, it does avail nothing in regards to salvation or your standing before God. That's what he taught against.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
Revelation 22:12-15, "And behold, I come quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give every man according as his work will be. I am the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End. Blessed are those who keep His Laws, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. For outside are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and worshipers of gods and everyone who professes to love, yet practices falsehood."
 
L

Least

Guest
No, because Paul taught to follow the Law, as long as it was done in the right context. The places where we see him coming against the law is when people were using it for justifications sake.

I keep using the scripture in Matthew because it is affirms Jesus' stance on the Law. No where does He say to not follow the law. It's obviously not for salvation because He says both those who do and those who don't are saved. No one really wants to address Jesus telling His followers to follow the law, except to say that he probably meant the Spirit.
So when you consider that Paul is coming against law keepers who did it for justification, a keeping of the 7th day sabbath or eating kosher or getting circumcised is completely acceptable.
It has been stated many times on these forums that the law is the school master. (Galatians 3:24-26)

Most believers would agree that these laws are still in affect. I hope so!

The Law of faith:

Romans 3:27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
Romans 3:27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Romans 3:29 Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:
Romans 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
Romans 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

The Law of Truth:

Malachi 2:6 The law of truth was in his mouth, and iniquity was not found in his lips: he walked with me in peace and equity, and did turn many away from iniquity.
Malachi 2:7 For the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.
Malachi 2:8 But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law; ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.

The Pharisees turned the Law into self-righteousness:

Matthew 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

The weighter matters of the Law are judgment, mercy, and faith.

Matthew 23:24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.
Matthew 23:25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.

In the early chapter of the bible, even after the Law was given to Moses and the people were expected to keep it. God said this:

Deuteronomy 9:4 Speak not thou in thine heart, after that the LORD thy God hath cast them out from before thee, saying, For my righteousness the LORD hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD doth drive them out from before thee.
Deuteronomy 9:5 Not for thy righteousness, or for the uprightness of thine heart, dost thou go to possess their land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee, and that he may perform the word which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Deuteronomy 9:6 Understand therefore, that the LORD thy God giveth thee not this good land to possess it for thy righteousness; for thou art a stiffnecked people.

Nehemiah 9:6 Thou, even thou, art LORD alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee.
Nehemiah 9:7 Thou art the LORD the God, who didst choose Abram, and broughtest him forth out of Ur of the Chaldees, and gavest him the name of Abraham;
Nehemiah 9:8 And foundest his heart faithful before thee, and madest a covenant with him to give the land of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Jebusites, and the Girgashites, to give it, I say, to his seed, and hast performed thy words; for thou art righteous:

Abraham was faithful even before the covenant was made to give the land to his descendants.

Refer back to Romans 3 above on the law of Faith.

Genesis 18:18 Seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him?
Genesis 18:19 For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him.

Romans 4:1 What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?
Romans 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

Abraham was justified by FAITH, he believed God and did what God told him to do. It was never about his own righteousness, but because he really believed, he was justified."The flesh" in the above verse is tied to the carnal man. The carnal mind is not subject to the laws of God, neither indeed can it be."
 
Last edited:

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,042
241
63
Then you should agree.

we should not only be circumcising our children. But we should be having levitical priests, Meeting on Saterday, Celebrating the passover meals and the other cerminonies according to law. And while we are at it. Where is the temple and the animals to sacrifice?

The law came as a whole. not a part. When jesus said obey my commands, He is not speaking of law. He is speaking of the things he told them to do. And taught them for the three years he was with them, as well as the moral guidance he gave them, such as in matt 5.
It depends on why anyone thinks we should. I've never once said the entire Law is binding on everyone, and that everyone should do all of it. That's the miscommuincation. As soon as I say I follow commandments in the Law, people assume I have to do all of it. The thing is, I don't follow it because I have to follow all of it. I read through the Scriptures as we all do, and the Spirit says, "Matt, let me show you something. Do this." So I do it. It's the exact same that happens with all of us when we read the NT as well.

I know what the sacrifice truly is. I know who my Priest is. I know where the temple is today. Does it fit exactly with the Law? No. But that doesn't mean I negate all of it because I don't have a field where I can leave the corners unharvested to the poor can glean there. I'm obedient to the things the Spirit lays on my heart. I'm not responsible for any of it until it's laid on my heart. If I were to say that I have to do it as a whole to please God, everyone's concerns would be valid.

But I've never said that.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,042
241
63
not according to the vs.

Any man born of a woman would include ALL OT writers.
.

Correct. What I'm saying is that because the OT writers, who were born of women and are in the Kingdom of Heaven, they are greater that John according to the verse Rose mentioned.