N
Why are we allowing our government to trample our Christian values?
I was commenting on the ''it's going to happen anyways, so why try?'' attitude. Otherwise spelled A-P-A-T-H-Y.Didn't the Nazi acquiescing church essentially worship Hitler? I don't think Richie_2uk has expressed any love for tyranny.
And what can we do? I don't think it's appropriate for Christians to use force to achieve their objectives. The only thing I can think of is making people (and especially other Christians) more aware of what has happened, and applying 2 Chronicles 7:14.
"If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."
I thought you were referring to those so-called Christians who (at least according to what I've read) viewed Hitler as some sort of saviour equivalent to Jesus. As long as we're praying, I don't think we're in apathy.I was commenting on the ''it's going to happen anyways, so why try?'' attitude. Otherwise spelled A-P-A-T-H-Y.
The government is NOT trampling your Christian values. That is nonsense.
NO ONE is telling you what you can or cannot believe.
I was under the impression that this was a liberal site (at least this is the site that came up when I Bing-ed "liberal Christian forums") but not when it is filled with ultra-conservative, anti Obama paranoia.
Yes, additionally there are those who won't speak in defense of the defenseless, who will buckle to social pressure for fear or $$$, pastors who won't call sin just to have numbers etc. It's more an inhouse problem than a govt one.I thought you were referring to those so-called Christians who (at least according to what I've read) viewed Hitler as some sort of saviour equivalent to Jesus. As long as we're praying, I don't think we're in apathy.
![]()
Yes, additionally there are those who won't speak in defense of the defenseless, who will buckle to social pressure for fear or $$$, pastors who won't call sin just to have numbers etc. It's more an inhouse problem than a govt one.
Yes there is prayer but also things like...
How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Selah. Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked. They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course.
(Psa 82:2-5)
This isn't an excuse to allow evil to prosper.Because the bible says it's needs must be to fulfill prophesy.
-vote, your allowed to vote more than once now, aren't you??![]()
Yes, additionally there are those who won't speak in defense of the defenseless, who will buckle to social pressure for fear or $$$, pastors who won't call sin just to have numbers etc. It's more an inhouse problem than a govt one.
Yes there is prayer but also things like...
How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Selah. Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked. They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course.
(Psa 82:2-5)
I firmly believe that Christians should be more focused on the Great Commission, and should stop distracting themselves in the affairs of this world.
I have a tendency to be interested in conspiracy theories about government cover-ups and the corporate control of our food energy and water supplies.... but these are TEMPTATIONS to be distracted from my calling.
Are Christians supposed to slowly make the world better until it slowly becomes the Kingdom of God?
Or are we supposed to preach the Gospel to as many as we can before God brings the world to Judgement?
The big mistake that we (believers) have made for over 50 years, is separating ourselves from where we are placed in the real world. Dividing these two factions is assisting in the separation of church and state, which is not constitutional.