Post after post of nonsense mixed in with some truth all disjointed and strung out over pages. It's either deliberate or your thinking is that disjointed. Either way, it's unacceptable. No coherent, competent presentation evidenced by scholarly sources. Just a lot of blather with a few nuggets tossed in to "prove" that which isn't even true.
Scholarly sources? How about the fact that some things ought to be so blatantly obvious except, apparently, for the text-book thinker. Alternatively a student, albeit pays an absurd amount of money to an organisation for a rather expensive piece of paper, a degree for the privilege, is called intelligent if he gets an A. [I would be more interested in how difficult the subject is, next how close the scores are to the average.] Why, well because the student has researched the scholar and used his ideas in his written paper. If it is not in black and white and the source is not a 'scholar', does this mean that it is not true. Ermm..that will be a resounding no. Why, you may ask. Well, smart people don't want to get caught, for some reason. I can't really see academic sources publishing conspiracy literature. Do as you're told, obey society, accept your function and your station or status, but never question the system in itself.
Simple minded people think like this: The UN rules all governments in the world. The IMF rules all central banking for all nations in the world. Etc... FALSE. Not currently they don't.
What you have are nations formed into blocs of power that compete with each other to progress various agendas which contradict each other. Sometimes compromise occurs and sometimes it doesn't. Some of them want what you fear and others certainly do not. There is tension and struggle and scope creep.
I wish it were all black or all white. It would be so easy then. But it's not. It's grey. You call it what it isn't (e.g. all black) and I call it what it is (e.g. grey).
You say the IMF controls the central banks of the nations of the world. I've shown you that currently they certainly do not. And what do I get in return, you invoke 911 to "prove" the IMF controls the world's central banks. Ridiculous.
I might as well go play a video game. It makes more sense than pages and pages of fool's gold with a few nuggets thrown in to prove it's a gold mine. LOL.
But that's where you're at intellectually and the same reason you turn on me and accuse me of working for the government in some kind of a uber secret NSA conspiracy ROFL! I WISH I had that paycheck.
No. The only government job I've ever held in my entire life was one tour in the military. That's all. But I understand, you NEED a conspiracy even for that to help you make sense out of the world because you're simple people that think in terms of black and white instead of as they are in reality.
Like I said, it's grey. There actually are bad actors and selfish elitists. There actually are global organizations growing in power exceeding their desirable scopes. There actually are forty-seven public corporations at the heart of most of the industrialized world's transactions (though there is heavy turnover at the top within about forty two of them).
We must all be vigilant and constantly work for reform: especially in these times when reform is desperately needed and very desirable to get much better results like we once did but no longer do.
And that reform can mean the dissolution of various bodies. BUT, and I've not seen the slightest evidence that you're smart enough to understand this, the need for good communications is of paramount importance between nations to work toward avoiding serious conflict.
If the past is any indication, your brains will take that last statement and put it in black or white terms. You'll say, "there's already conflict!" Well yes, but we've managed to avoid a lot more conflict by communicating with each other.
For example, the space between WWI and WWII was only twenty-one years. The space between WWII and WWIII is at least sixty-eight years and growing by the day. Hopefully, it will never happen. But if you dissolve all means of nations communicating with each other: it may commence in short order.
I'm on your side which is really our side: all of ours. But you're not smart enough to figure that out either. There can only be two sides in the mind of simple minded people: us versus them. EOM.
. I may give him another chance to show he's grow up in about eleven months. Until then, I'm not going to subject myself to MR's juvenile inane blather. Got to go. Peace everyone.
