You're completely misrepresenting my position and my solution (even though I've explained it all to you before) but that aside, and more importantly: you're wrong.
Replacing a reformable workable system with gold dust, mattresses, and storage lockers ends in economic collapse and severe depression with no way forward. It's obvious to anyone who understand economics.
no, the current system is
completely unworkable, because it was designed by a criminal network with power.
gold dust etc? ha? dunno what you're talking about.
you're
going into economic collapse and severe depression with no way forward.
there's only
one way a fiat system could be salvaged. at this point, it's impossible. so i'm not even going there.
...
AoK, you began this thread with an article: Re:
The IMF Wants YOUR Money, yet somehow have managed to avoid seeing what the IMF is and does. that's just silly...it's an extortion and eugenics machine. it doesn't
have to be, but it is.
anyway....here's my take on what we've talked about, for what it's worth:
neo-fascism, this global kind (which is
not the end-game)...is not like the
nationalist authoritarian systems we saw after (or as a result of) WW1. those involved
national industrialization, and to a large degree actual true "nationalism" (even though ludicrous national histories had to be invented - "patriotism").
but what we have now is
deindustrialization of certain nations (yours) and the industrialization of others (china), by
global managers,
by design, not by accident or logical results of free market capitalism.
previously, arguments had been the nuttiness of ideas like - the collective
vs the individual. always
versus.....the end game is that
on steroids, but which is reserved for
after the neo-fascism is allowed to runs its course.
some conditions consitently present when fascism rises are: uber-bureaucracies and inexplicably
ineffective judicial systems (and deadlock/no compromise between govt "parties"....this is arranged easily through polarization - i.e: red/blue)
bureaucracy
ˌbjʊ(ə)ˈrɒkrəsi
noun
1.
a system of government in which most of the important decisions are taken by state officials rather than by elected representatives.
...
only this time, the state officials making the decisions are actually private individuals who own 'corporations'; which own the govt
because of the surrender of
the govt's responsibility to control the money system of the nation.
at this point there is no difference between public and private sectors, except in the minds of the populace, who have been on the receiving end of another feature of the rise of fascism:
the slogan - which is shallow emotional appeal to relief
from the uber-bureaucracies and inexplicably
ineffective judicial systems, and deadlock/polarization.
in other words, if you are the psychopaths who want it all (including power over
you which is really the driver).....in order to take over
everything....you industrialize a given state (USA), you build it (by financing industry
temporarily) and have it generate unimaginable amounts of wealth (in the form of real assets, which you call PUBLIC). "hey public! - you own this stuff you worked and paid for"....then once it is built and paid for, you privatize it - see: bureaucracy, above (you have to take it over,
because of the inexplicable
"mismanagment" of those public assets/programs).
so you have purposely made a functioning, productive system
dysfunctional (you should have kept regulated but unrestricted industry & tightly controlled international trade agreements NOT designed by the private sector disguised as govt) ...which creates unrest
starting with the so-called middle class. it's not the super-poor who start agitating for immediate results when the dysfunction is complete - it's the middle class (which in america's case is illusory anyway - itself being like the "economy" you say can be reformed, in that it [the middle class] is expanded and contracted at will by manipulation of the debt system).
when you have unrest in the "middle class" is when you see the rise of fascism. deep polarization until the fascist elements (who are fed up with the "liberal" wing's inexplicable
intractability) begin to act on the slogans they've been given as the quick fix to the deadlock: "change you can believe in; hope & change" etc....and/or "occupy this and that" tea party this and that". which are
meaningless.
though you see the vulgar gangs and vigilantism that is the face of
fascism in the street (usually fanned by race baiting or scapegoating) in reality the fascist elements working within govt (which is now private) and through legal means is quietly working through the judiciary (which was inexplicably
unworkable before), and
is also private.
so you have executive powers taken legally (or rather
given)...while the senate and representatives are despised for their
apparent inability to FIX THIS THING. in reality, they've been bought, and paid to
not do anything to fix this thing.
the slogan is,
the system is broken. we have to make radical changes. deep cuts. austerity....because of the inexplicable
mismanagement of public affairs. so you have two kinds of policing now happening:
the state's (which had the public's trust and permission to use force and violence when absolutely necessary) and the (fake) grass-roots fascist's virtual anarchism. now the polarization will be seen strictly in terms of who can RESTORE ORDER....
but if we had been paying attention, we should have seen people like Peter Drucker at work developing "management" models....and recognized those structures for what they are.
those guys are the ones who are setting up the Third Way...the thing that will have to come
after the
regional fascism (we can call it that now, since the sovereign nation-state no longer exists) has destroyed any remaining civilization as we know it and desire (by civilization, i mean actual civility among people in a nation).
to overthrow the
old order of the US (over-simplified: a Constitutional Republic with assimilationism; industriousness; rule of law AND an armed populace etc...
you and i would add something of a Christian foundation...i know that can be argued).....you had to bring in
nihilism.
without that, we wouldn't be where we are.
so how do you you introduce nihilism into a nation of people who believe in God (Christians, we'll say)?
again, through
slogans, specifically via your "think tanks"
established by guys like Edward Bernays. propaganda that your life is not good enough unless you
have and get.....so you overthrow the old order by means of demoralization (dismantling the old morality) until life appears to have no meaning.
once life appears to have no meaning, you use
the private judiciary to implement the eugenics agenda....and i'm actually sick and tired of all of this being dismissed as "conspiracy theory"....since ANY thinking human being with ANY conscience left can LOOK and see through ONE THING only that this is a deadly; satanic war - ABORTION.
55+ million and counting. and moving toward the very carefully planned and on record goals of
absolute demoralization until there's nothing left but localized fascism (where extremists take matters into their own hands) while the globalists are putting the finishing touches on the ALTERNATIVE....as a Christian, you
should know by now what that is.
summary:
your dumb ideas for 'reforming' the debt slavery system are exactly what they gave you to go on about. it's stupid.
Red (White) and Blue...like seriously? think about that for a minute. there's no money AoK! none. and no way for you to make any or do anything when they pull the plug.
just get on with the Gospel and know that the Lord delivers us
through suffering and oppression, not out of it via some pretrib rapture or Tea party.
k.....too much coffee.
zone.