Courting vs. Dating. Which are you for doing when you meet someone special ? Why? :-)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Courting or Dating. Which is your pick for a relationsihp? That is the question :=)

  • Courting and I am a guy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dating and I am a guy

    Votes: 5 21.7%
  • Courting and I am a girl

    Votes: 8 34.8%
  • Dating and I am a girl

    Votes: 6 26.1%
  • Neither. I want to be just friends, but, people not present, but NO physical contact ever either bes

    Votes: 4 17.4%

  • Total voters
    23
C

Coil

Guest
#41
What about being friends and not ever calling it 'dating,' nautilus, there is a third option for you :)

Also, this would enhance the thread , perhaps, if people want to give reasons that have not yet for why they chose courting over dating or vice versa, or, like me, chose being a friend that would hold hands, maybe, a peck on the cheek every once in awhile, because , the Lord leads, and, affection is important.
To me, that sounds like a subtle version of friends with benefits. That last option just rubs me the wrong way. Why would you be "just friends" with someone you're romantically interested in? As a girl, I would be very frustrated with a guy who couldn't actually commit and define the relationship as something more than friends. Also, I don't hold hands or kiss my friends. Maybe you meant for this option at the very beginning of a relationship, which is fine, but after you know you're interested, you should commit, in my opinion. Otherwise, the friends method is a cop out.
 

rachelsedge

Senior Member
Oct 15, 2012
3,659
81
48
34
#42
I don't really understand what courting is because its definition seems to vary depending on who you're talking to.

All I know is I want to be able to at least hold hands and be close, and not have a chaperon watching over my shoulder at all times. It's hard to have spontaneity in a relationship if you have to make sure that an "adult overseer" can also come along. Doesn't sound very fun to me.
 
C

Crazylove

Guest
#43
I'm doing neither but this Duggar fan likes courting! Much more wise ;)
 
G

GreenNnice

Guest
#44
Originally Posted by GreenNnice
What about being friends and not ever calling it 'dating,' nautilus, there is a third option for you :)

Also, this would enhance the thread , perhaps, if people want to give reasons that have not yet for why they chose courting over dating or vice versa, or, like me, chose being a friend that would hold hands, maybe, a peck on the cheek every once in awhile, because , the Lord leads, and, affection is important.

To me, that sounds like a subtle version of friends with benefits. That last option just rubs me the wrong way. Why would you be "just friends" with someone you're romantically interested in? As a girl, I would be very frustrated with a guy who couldn't actually commit and define the relationship as something more than friends. Also, I don't hold hands or kiss my friends. Maybe you meant for this option at the very beginning of a relationship, which is fine, but after you know you're interested, you should commit, in my opinion. Otherwise, the friends method is a cop out.
No way, milady, coilgoil, I most certainly do not mean 'friends with benefits.'
That option of being friends in the poll, but not having parents or friends having to go out with you everywhere you go, IS with the benefit of following a pure, Godly way of doing things up to marriage. You are friends, but you are also attracted to each other and holding hands is a benefit as well as an occassional peck on the cheek.
The guy needs to be in control of this affection, too, I think, because the girl can be deceived much easier per Scripture, of Adam and Eve, read 1 Tim. 2:13-14, and, this is NOT to knock miladies one smidegeon; the guy must have a concrete understanding ,promise, guarantee, straight to God, that he will not go beyond those mentioned acts of affection.
 
Mar 22, 2013
4,718
124
63
Indiana
#45
I don't really understand what courting is because its definition seems to vary depending on who you're talking to.

All I know is I want to be able to at least hold hands and be close, and not have a chaperon watching over my shoulder at all times. It's hard to have spontaneity in a relationship if you have to make sure that an "adult overseer" can also come along. Doesn't sound very fun to me.
yeah the courting thing dont sound fun at all, honestly I would find it annoying to have someone following me around.
 

Misty77

Senior Member
Aug 30, 2013
1,746
45
0
#46
I am a fan of casual dating. (Note: that does not equal "casual sex.") No expectations. No sex. No commitments. When or if we feel that the relationship is going somewhere, then it's time make it exclusive, meet the family, that sort of thing.

I practiced courtship the first time around when I was 18, and I was married 9 months later. He asked my father's permission, spent a lot of time with my family, and I had a 10 pm curfew until the day I got married. In public, his manners were impeccable; and he knew all the good Christian things to say. He seemed great, but since we spent little time alone, I never really got to know his true character.

Courtship puts a lot of pressure on the relationship working out when you should be just be getting to know each other. And when you are just stepping out into the dating world, you don't really know what a healthy—or toxic—relationship looks like. You need to be free to meet different people so you get to know who you are in a relationship and what works for you.

Since I have been divorced, I learned how to date without expectations. When you think about it, all relationships are temporary; you just don't know the expiration date ahead of time. You might be together for a few months, a few decades, or just a really fun evening together (again, not talking about sex). I meet a lot of people, I know what I am looking for, and I have a really good time without heartache.

People don't accidentally have sex. I can have a man (one that I already trust) over to my house for dinner and Netflix without losing control. For that matter, a guy that I dated for several months spent the night on my couch a few times. My son was home, and so were my sister and her husband. Nothing wrong with that at all. Boundaries are clearly set up, and I don't date guys who pressure me for more. I can hold hands or exchange a quick kiss without losing all control (long kiss is a different story). But perhaps I am different because I had a very active sex life for 10 years so I know where I stand sexually; I'm not just speaking theoretically.

If I am dating someone, then there is definitely going to be physical contact by way of hugs or leaning my head on his shoulder because that's just how I roll. And as idealistic as the never-touching thing is, I think there are some pitfalls to consider.
1.) As someone who has given marital counseling, I know too many women who have had "sex=bad" drilled into their head for so long that they are unable to turn that off. You can start thinking of the body as taboo or dirty, and that can lead to really difficult problems in marriage.
2.) Anyone see that clip from the Virgin Diaries? As Ellen said, "Kissing should involve a lot less chewing." You can tell how someone is going to be in bed by how they kiss (usually). You don't want a bad/selfish/creepy one.
3.) How are you going to go from from nothing to everything in an afternoon without being so tense that it is a very unpleasant experience?
4.) You really need to have an idea of the libido/desire of the person you are marrying because that will effect you. Every day. For the rest of your life. Without having sex, you can get an idea of that with how they respond physically with you. If your fiance is an ice queen, then your wife will probably be one, too.

I mean, think about it. How can you spend 30 years repressing part of you, then expect it to pop up healthy and ready to go? Even while celibate, you need to accept yourself as a sexual being but chose to walk in purity by the power of the Lord.
 

Misty77

Senior Member
Aug 30, 2013
1,746
45
0
#47
"The guy needs to be in control of this affection, too, I think, because the girl can be deceived much easier per Scripture, of Adam and Eve, read 1 Tim. 2:13-14, and, this is NOT to knock miladies one smidegeon; the guy must have a concrete understanding ,promise, guarantee, straight to God, that he will not go beyond those mentioned acts of affection."

One quick comment: It says that Eve (one person) was deceived, not that women in general are more easily deceived. That's an assumption that has been propagated by complementarians.
 
Mar 22, 2013
4,718
124
63
Indiana
#48
I don't know about all this kissing stuff. But I do know I can go without touching anyone. ive done without it my whole life. actually these days I dont like the idea of anyone touching me at all.

So honestly I could "spend the night" at anyones house without any funny stuff going on.. but I wouldnt really sleep anyway since I cant sleep in new places.
 
G

GreenNnice

Guest
#49
"The guy needs to be in control of this affection, too, I think, because the girl can be deceived much easier per Scripture, of Adam and Eve, read 1 Tim. 2:13-14, and, this is NOT to knock miladies one smidegeon; the guy must have a concrete understanding ,promise, guarantee, straight to God, that he will not go beyond those mentioned acts of affection."

One quick comment: It says that Eve (one person) was deceived, not that women in general are more easily deceived. That's an assumption that has been propagated by complementarians.
I'll say it then, mistsevens, 'women in general are more easily deceived.'

This is different from Adam, who was the first man whom I see as the caricature of man, for feelings and traits, and, he willfully sinned. It wasn't until Adam's sin of eating the fruit that God came down hard on both.
God let Eve's transgression slide because she was deceived, but Adam's was of consequence for both because Adam knew exactly what he did was wrong.

Anyway, hopefully, that makes sense . And, complementarianism? Eh. Not really. I mean, yes, women and men have different roles, biologically, of course, God made us different, but, other than that, like having babies in bellies for one and not the other, I believe, a woman can hold ANY position in the church or wherever that a man can, as long as she has the Lord with her going/supporting/leading , a.k.a. being 'called' by God :) The Lord leads, producing 'fruit' is the key for ANY one, man or woman, doing ANY THING for Him, doing it for His glory :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
C

Coil

Guest
#50
No way, milady, coilgoil, I most certainly do not mean 'friends with benefits.'
That option of being friends in the poll, but not having parents or friends having to go out with you everywhere you go, IS with the benefit of following a pure, Godly way of doing things up to marriage. You are friends, but you are also attracted to each other and holding hands is a benefit as well as an occassional peck on the cheek.
The guy needs to be in control of this affection, too, I think, because the girl can be deceived much easier per Scripture, of Adam and Eve, read 1 Tim. 2:13-14, and, this is NOT to knock miladies one smidegeon; the guy must have a concrete understanding ,promise, guarantee, straight to God, that he will not go beyond those mentioned acts of affection.
I still don't see how the friends while being attracted to each other is any better than dating, except that it caters to the noncommittal types.

Also, when you say "the guy needs to be in control of this affection," do you mean that the guy must always take the initiative for the physical aspects of relationships?
 

Misty77

Senior Member
Aug 30, 2013
1,746
45
0
#51
I'll say it then, mistsevens, 'women in general are more easily deceived.'
Based on what? You can't just decide that something is allegorical. "Because I say so" is not a theological argument.
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#52
Courting is:
Courtship takes the position that the two people have no physical contact at all (no touching, no hand-holding, no kissing) until marriage.

DATING:

dating.jpg

COURTING:

courting1.jpg
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#53
I choose courting.


I do not want to court but be courted by the gentleman I agree upon.

Some way of courting one does not even meet close but always keeps away from another and never actually touches each other in body to body in any way shape or form nor does one socialise in normal ways (not as friends would either).
One has "aprons" as (such as parents friends) aswell as keeps a distance.
Or communicated with help of devices.

One may possibly kiss but only via spirit or without the bodies so to say. lol

A man has been courting me for over a year on and off.
He always comes back to me but we never met and although some said he with other woman i do not beleive them.
Maybe im naive.
We never even met in time.
He came to me as a catholic man he said but the catholic people were really bad to me and did not welcome me but were not nice.
Then when i was christened a time name they forsed me have another name and be another son and i refused so they shadowed me and were more threatening.
I left church and christianity after way they treated me.



Another man proposed many yrs and i always said no.He was not nice and his already married and she was awful to me and i did not know why but apparently he wanted to marry me and her and i always said no.
Not mentioning the evil they did to me and how much they stole from me.
i did not like them and i dont want to wear burka , be shadowed or abused or slave , gimp or etc .

I must speak with the good jesus and find way and faith back.


One husband for me only who want one wife and not many times other woman.....


If some one court me i may court back by show appreciation such as organise food for he.
If im not seeing him in the flesh then i can make arrangements to have food served for him or have a message given or something else sweet.
Here I see romantic things, but these will not work to make an everlasting romance or courship.

some years I thought that would function, but I´m changing my mind. I could give her a call or a "visit" on skype, but that is not real, you cannot smell the person you think U have found. You can not hear his breathing or his seeing and, vaguely U would see he likes you, up to the moment a phone rang and some of both get distrated and that connection fades away: I know it!

Walking and talking toguether could be more real.

Her I have seen how some people regret they look at other peoples instead of the person they VERBALLY said "I like you" or "I love you".

By their deeds you see that is not true, particularly when someone comes like a jailbait, his eyes go to another place and not your side (that happens to women, being screwed up with that trick, too)

I have problems to understand all you ideas. I don´t get very well your English but I like reading some of your romantic ideas... I used to write poems and those feelngs I had, but I´m getting cold and old.

No problem! I´m alive. :)

P.S.

Another thing: Your relationship with humans has nothing to do with your committement to GOD and Jesus. They´re not guilty for human faults. It is US, human, who deserve a punch...:mad:
 
Last edited: