Ok, so here’s my attempt at starting a contextual read of the book/letter of Romans...although, I’m not quite sure of the proper format. I've been thinking about it for a little while now and I’m not sure what would work best so I’m just gonna try something. My goal is to try to establish an unbroken chain of context in simple language as best as possible.
I was thinking I could post through Romans like we do on “The Bible verse by verse” thread, only with a few special guidelines...
1. Complete Thoughts
Passages from Romans must be posted in completed thoughts, regardless of chapter or verse markings, whether it’s a single line or several verses long.
[For example, Romans 1:1-6 can be comprehended as a single thought. While Romans 1:7 starts a separate thought.]
2. Format
3. Agreeing or Disagree
4. If a better format would work I’m open for suggestions. This is more or less by trial and error.
---
Feel free to use whichever translation you want, but in hopes of keeping it a simple read I'm using ESV (though I'm partial to KJV).
I was thinking I could post through Romans like we do on “The Bible verse by verse” thread, only with a few special guidelines...
Thread Guidelines:
1. Complete Thoughts
Passages from Romans must be posted in completed thoughts, regardless of chapter or verse markings, whether it’s a single line or several verses long.
[For example, Romans 1:1-6 can be comprehended as a single thought. While Romans 1:7 starts a separate thought.]
2. Format
- Previous Context – Quote the previous conclusion/point that you're following.
- Next Passage – Post the next portion of passage (complete thought) with verses
- Conclusion/Point – As simple as possible what is Paul saying (following the context)?
3. Agreeing or Disagree
- If you agree with an overall interpretation, “like” it...but please DON’T REPLY with agreement or commentary (to try to keep posts to a minimum).
- I’m going to continue through as I have the time, but if you disagree with an overall interpretation of a passage, please post your alternative of that passage following the same format. Add “Alternative Interpretation to…” or something that lets readers know. But PLEASE refrain from splitting hairs unless the overall interpretation hinges on it.
- If you’d like further elaboration of an interpretation request it here. But if you want to argue against an interpretation of a passage, please reference the portion and start a new thread about it (at least we’ll be able to pinpoint the source of our disagreements).
- If you are asked to further explain an interpretation, you’re encouraged to reply with additional scriptural references if you choose to reply.
4. If a better format would work I’m open for suggestions. This is more or less by trial and error.
---
Feel free to use whichever translation you want, but in hopes of keeping it a simple read I'm using ESV (though I'm partial to KJV).