This may have already been shown, so if it has, I apologize.
A prophecy in Ezekiel and a Scripture in Leviticus showed that Israel would become a nation again in 1948!
full article is here:
Author: Bible predicted date of Israel’s return
It is so amazing to me that God told us the year and month Israel would become a nation again thousands of years before it happened!
A nation of Christ hating Talmudists calling itself "Israel" does not make it so. Scripture does not identify latter day Israel based upon the idea that God's covenant people rejected Jesus 2000 years ago.
The seminaries do, but scripture does not. Hebrews, an epistle to Hebrew-Israelites identifies them in a Christian new covenant context. Read chapters 8-10. They tell us that the New Covenant, that which was promised to, and made with
"the house of Israel and with the house of Judah" (Jer. 31:31; Heb. 8:8) went into effect on that night of the Last Supper 2000 years ago. Hebrews proves that the seminaries and Bible colleges, by teaching that Israel rejected Jesus, are promoting a lie, one designed for the benefit of a counterfeit Israel. And how about James? Addressed to
"...the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad" (James 1:1) it, like Hebrews, identifies the covenant people in a Christian new covenant context. And how about Acts? When the Holy Spirit came, as described in chapter two,
it was upon Jews (real Jews), on those of the Judah portion of Israel. Acts 4 tells us that these Christian Israelites numbered about 5000. And how about Acts 21:20:
"Thou seest brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe." Does this sound like the people today who say they are Jews ("...them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan" [Rev. 2:9; 3:9])? Scripture, speaking of Jews, tells us it was
"...some" (Rom. 3:3), not all who rejected Jesus. Why then does the religious establishment identify Israel based upon a lie, upon the idea that that genetic Israel, those
"twelve tribes...scattered abroad" in the first century were a Christ rejecting people? And why do a majority of Christians fall for this lie? Why are they so easily duped into supporting
"the synagogue of Satan?" Is it not because they are first duped with the idea repeated as, "Israel rejected Jesus?"
So, who then are today's descendants of those
Christian Israelites "scattered abroad" in the first century? Would it not have to be, historically, a Christian people? Read Isaiah 44:21-23 and 59:20-21. These and a multitude of others tells us that the Holy Spirit would not depart from those Christian Israelites nor their descendants
"forever." Read it, it tells us that the Israelite descendants of those first Christians would continue, in an unbroken line, as the nucleus of the church and the custodians of God's word. Does this sound like today's Pharisees, or does it best fit historic Christianity, the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and related European people? How can
today's Pharisees, today's
"synagogue of Satan" be Israelites and inherit the kingdom of God when they will not rise on resurrection day? Do you really think that an historically non-Christian people
(the dead in Phariseeism) will rise in the resurrection? They will not. And because they will not they cannot therefore inherit the kingdom with Jesus, and are not therefore, the Israel of God. Think about it.
