dang it got erased
Anyway - radiometric dating is crap, so is carbon dating
If you take known ages of rock and send it for radiometric dating, and it comes back saying 2 million years old - there might be a problem - how would we believe it works for unknown ages?
Carbon dating - maybe good for a few thousand years, that's it, if not less - especially when you can date a living snail to be 600 years old
Using ice cores rings to date "one year" highly unlikely since in 250 feet of snow they found a WWII plane - ice core had 1,000's of rings - ice rings represent warming and cooling periods - that's how hail forms layers, duh - you can have 10 or more warming periods in a year.
There is a secular article called
Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision.
Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular tim... [Trends Genet. 2004] - PubMed - NCBI
Basic number crunch they come up with 5.5 or so billion years of "evolution" when they add all the time scales - anyone see a problem that the earth supposedly is 4.5 billion - what the heck happened during that a billion years or so?