No. He is implying th emoment one is saved, he is made part of the church. If they are not saved, they are not a part of the church (even if they may be attending church services)
I may have misunderstood what he was saying.
But he said "
They are not saved because they are in the church but are in the church because they are saved."
The part I underlined I disagree wtih. One is saved b
ecause he is in the church, in the body of Christ.
Being "in the church" and "saved" are
equivalent terms. As I read and understood his statement above, he seems to be trying to make them
NOT equivalent. He is saying that one is first saved, then
AFTER he is saved he then is placed in the church.
Here is the reason I am suspecting he is doing this separation between being "in the church" and being "saved":
Paul wrote his Ephesian letter to the church at Ephesus wherein Paul says that church was sealed, Eph 1:13. Yet some years later the church at Ephesus had fallen, left their first love and if they did not obey the command to repent their candlestick (church) would be removed (Rev 2) proving that salvation is conditonal and can be lost. So he is trying to
disassociate salvation from being in the church to just the individual to avoid dealing with the church at Ephesus falling.
eternallygratful said:
Everyone was outside the body of Christ until they were saved. No one who is in the body of Christ got resaved, they were already saved. You can;t resave an already saved person.
But one who has fallen away can be "re-save":
James 5:19,20 "Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one
convert him; Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins."