constantine created new testament

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
#21
it's important for people to realize that God gave us ample evidence to allow us to trust His Word. How you ask? because as we find more ancient manuscripts it would be all too easy to find manuscripts that disagree with what we currently hold to be the Word of God. Amazingly (or some might say) DIVINELY God produces thousands upon thousands of handwritten manuscripts spread over time and distance that agree to the letter. God trumps satan- yet again.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#22
No, I don't just believe something because someone says it is so...that's why I asked for a source.
Yes, we all have our biases...again why I asked.
You asked for a source to try to prove that what I said wasn't so, you have no interest in looking for truth as you have shown over and over in your posts. I am glad you admit it for all the world to see. If I had asked for a source it would have been to check you for truth, not with the intents and motivations you have. You will not look at my sources, we know that, for they might lead you to truth.
 

Pie

Senior Member
May 21, 2011
151
1
18
#23
You asked for a source to try to prove that what I said wasn't so, you have no interest in looking for truth as you have shown over and over in your posts. I am glad you admit it for all the world to see. If I had asked for a source it would have been to check you for truth, not with the intents and motivations you have. You will not look at my sources, we know that, for they might lead you to truth.
I don't normally engage in dialogue like this because it's pointless... but...
Ad hominem overload. This makes me a sad panda. :(
I would like to hear you out on your points Red, but it's hard when this is what you are offering.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#24
I don't normally engage in dialogue like this because it's pointless... but...
Ad hominem overload. This makes me a sad panda. :(
I would like to hear you out on your points Red, but it's hard when this is what you are offering.
Pie, I know, and I really don't know what to do about it. I have several on cc who have decided to oppose me rather than speak of scripture. Yet, it is always scripture that suffers without them addressing it directly only me personally. It could be that it is best I leave cc and let them take over, but that seems wrong, too.

We should be able to simply discuss Constantine's role in the bible choice, and we could bring in his overall role as a side issue. He is a controversial figure and we could all learn much from it. That a personal vendetta should enter in is just terrible.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
#25
Constantine sure did a good job.

Kudos to him.

lol
 
Apr 27, 2014
96
0
0
#26
This wasn't posted to ruffle any feathers, the Bible contradicts itself throughout the whole book, and suppresses women to participate in church.....you can't skip over the posts you don't agree with and chose the ones you like that's why i started my research on who put the new testament together.
 
P

phil112

Guest
#28
Originally Posted by RedTent
For instance, a basic premise of that council was to organize a church that was far from God the Creator, Jews followed God and we must not follow Jews, they said.
Can you give a source for this assertion?
Rather than give a source, as requested, red goes off on a tangent about being persecuted. :rolleyes:

Then, after that, has the gall to point the finger at another for doing precisely what she just did, that is, to sidestep scripture and assert a personal attack.
Pie, I know, and I really don't know what to do about it. I have several on cc who have decided to oppose me rather than speak of scripture. Yet, it is always scripture that suffers without them addressing it directly only me personally. .............
I have to say, I am laughing while I type this one. This is too rich, red...you poor persecuted person.
Here, let me give you a little more ammo!;)

pot_calling_kettle_black_large.jpg
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#29
This wasn't posted to ruffle any feathers, the Bible contradicts itself throughout the whole book, and suppresses women to participate in church.....you can't skip over the posts you don't agree with and chose the ones you like that's why i started my research on who put the new testament together.
Please show us these contradictions.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#30
You asked for a source to try to prove that what I said wasn't so, you have no interest in looking for truth as you have shown over and over in your posts. I am glad you admit it for all the world to see. If I had asked for a source it would have been to check you for truth, not with the intents and motivations you have. You will not look at my sources, we know that, for they might lead you to truth.
funny, others understood my intent yet you have to judge my motives. Fine, God's my witness.
 

Photoss

Senior Member
Sep 15, 2012
213
10
0
#31
The amount of false historical accusations and assumptions being being passed off as "truth" in this thread is appalling. :mad: Also, the ONLY MENTION of any 'Bible books' during the council was the conclusion that Judith was part of the canon. NOTHING else is mentioned in that aspect. First Council of Nicaea - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There's so many historical documents from the first few centuries and onward, it's a shame they don't get read very often!
The Council of Nicea and the Nicene Era

Here's a site that includes thousands of pages of documents and histories, both ante-Nicene and post-Nicene:
Early Church Fathers - Christian Classics Ethereal Library

 
Last edited:
Feb 7, 2013
1,276
21
0
#32
For example, there are documentaries about JESUS life and persecution, partly commenting about there is no evidence to proof of JESUS crucifixion. Speculations about possibilities, upon other artifacts found in similarities, that happened to others.

And no one could justify the shape of the cross of JESUS?

"By Grace through Faith and it is the gift of GOD."

When JESUS asked HIS disciples who HE was? Peter answered;

"You are CHRIST SON of the Living GOD."

"Simon son of Jonah, you did know his on your own but My FATHER in Heaven have let you know."

This is the free gift of GOD, of initial knowledge of revelational faith about the MESSIAH, in order to believe HIM and follow HIM in the first-fruit of faith. Then in continuing with HIM, there are further knowledge revelations through JESUS's teachings of spirit and life and lead practices, in order to 'supplement' to that initial faith and excel.

"Live by faith and not by sight."

"Christian faith is not based on seen artifacts and signs and wonders which are secondary proof but rather first, in initial faith of the gift of GOD by the revelational Holy Bible spiritual knowledge understandings about the FATHER, SON and the HOLY SPIRIT in the Gospels. Then in sound doctrine knowledge filled faith also through the writings of the Apostles, Christian faith increases in practices to all of them, as action faith, believing in the 'author and finisher of our faith' according to the New Covenant."
 
Last edited:
Feb 21, 2014
5,672
18
0
#34
I've studied up on how the new testament was put together, and it was because the emperor or Rome wanted to untie and strengthen his empire under one religion, so he called a lot of religious men to Rome, and gave them the task of putting together the new testament, they edited books and left books out that didn't go with the agenda of the emperor constantine. And this Bible is similar to the one we have today, constantines Bible was later edited further, to me that can't be simmering inspired by God but only by mans selfish needs. What do you think about this? Please give honest answers, don't think I'm attacking anyone, this is why I'm an agnostic....well one of the reasons
Do you wish to learn what the Bible teaches? or do you want to spread your opinions of the Bible, while you remain agnostic?

I guess for others it does help to know where you are coming from.
 
P

phil112

Guest
#35
Do you wish to learn what the Bible teaches? or do you want to spread your opinions of the Bible, while you remain agnostic?

I guess for others it does help to know where you are coming from.
That is a reasonable request for clarification for the OP.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#36
Rather than give a source, as requested, red goes off on a tangent about being persecuted. :rolleyes:

Then, after that, has the gall to point the finger at another for doing precisely what she just did, that is, to sidestep scripture and assert a personal attack.

I have to say, I am laughing while I type this one. This is too rich, red...you poor persecuted person.
Here, let me give you a little more ammo!;)

]78097[/ATTACH]
I copy and paste my reply to the request for my source: " I didn't make a list of the history books I went through, although I found checking authors for who backs them is a good indication of accuracy. Our top theological colleges have professors with good backgrounds.

The Catholic Church has been gathering historical information the longest, they report some of it on their site. I think it would be a good place to start.

I found that most historians have a bias, and to assess their accuracy it is a good thing to find their bias. "

I am not a poor person, for I don't slam other people. But thanks for the ammo.
 
P

pastac

Guest
#37
Constantine killed every true believer he could and "changed" Yahweh's Instructions, which was prophesied in Daniyl 7:25, to me this is without a doubt demonic, and not even by mistake, as Constantine enforced the holy day of Sol Invictus Mithra...

Personally saying there is nothing here is like a judge letting a suspected murder go because the police only found him standing over the body with the murder weapon in his hand, but not actually stabbing..... free to go?
So in essence this man was a lot like Saul before his conversion? Think about it.
The misnomer that many continue to share in keeps us away from real issues. Who cares about this sort of stuff. So you want to throw away the KJV because King James did the same thing?
You want to disallow all Bibles because they don't ascribe to your thought process? What is missing from the bible that you feel will change anything? Who wrote the Nt or who compiled it has nothing to do with souls being saved! Or people being beaten up for their lack of understanding. Just a few thoughts
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#38
Do you wish to learn what the Bible teaches? or do you want to spread your opinions of the Bible, while you remain agnostic?

I guess for others it does help to know where you are coming from.
The agnostics do give us a platform to present God to the world. It is those who profess that they Christian and exhibit only behavior and ideas against all of God and scripture that are our real enemies.
 
P

pastac

Guest
#39
This wasn't posted to ruffle any feathers, the Bible contradicts itself throughout the whole book, and suppresses women to participate in church.....you can't skip over the posts you don't agree with and chose the ones you like that's why i started my research on who put the new testament together.
This statement is a contradiction it was posted to ruffle feathers. it was posted to shed light on your beliefs. You then attack the Bible as suppressing to women and insult everyone who can read so if you did not want to ruffle feathers what was your point? Your studies. That is why you think like you do you lean to your own understanding! Just a few thoughts
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#40
So in essence this man was a lot like Saul before his conversion? Think about it.
The misnomer that many continue to share in keeps us away from real issues. Who cares about this sort of stuff. So you want to throw away the KJV because King James did the same thing?
You want to disallow all Bibles because they don't ascribe to your thought process? What is missing from the bible that you feel will change anything? Who wrote the Nt or who compiled it has nothing to do with souls being saved! Or people being beaten up for their lack of understanding. Just a few thoughts
Constantine still worshiped the Persian sun god after his "conversion"

his coins were minted with "commited to sol invictus mithra" after his conversion.

Constantine's supposed revelation from Jesus was to kill in the sign of the cross.

I never said Constantine created the "NT" I said just the opposite concerning the text.

but Constantine was a evil man.