H
Hoffco
Guest
WE are saved for the purpose , so we can keep the laws of God,joyfully. Now, after being saved we can keep God's laws to the happiness of God and our own eternal happiness. agree?? Love Hoff
But, God says the law gives our liberty and justice and happiness. Please don't say, God's laws cause bondage. AND, the "conscience of lOST men is not the ten commands. the conscience can be,,"i must kill my neighbor because of my custom. But custom can be very very wrong. Love Hoff
WE are saved for the purpose , so we can keep the laws of God,joyfully. Now, after being saved we can keep God's laws to the happiness of God and our own eternal happiness. agree?? Love Hoff
SIN makes bondage, breaking God's holy laws make bondage , not keeping God's laws, If it were not for sin, our sal. would be by law keeping. as Paul argues. Love. Hoff
For what the shadow is for.Is the reality enough for what?
For what the shadow is for.
Do you understand what a shadow in the OT of a future NT reality is?
Actually, Jesus didn't break it. The Sabbath forbid gathering. Jesus and His disciples were eating. The Pharisees however saw it differently.
Matthew 12:1
1At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath.
His disciples were hungry and began to pick some heads of grain and eat them.
2When the Pharisees saw this, they said to him, “Look! Your disciples are doing what is unlawful on the Sabbath.”
...picking was considered gathering
Just because Jesus didn't mention it here doesn't mean He was saying not to do it at all. He didn't need to reiterate everything because He(God) had already instructed it in the OT. Unless God says not to do something, you keep doing it.
In football terms, "Play till the whistle blows."
Unless it's no longer beneficial, but perhaps still permissible.
Why keep playing after the whistle has blown and the adversary defeated?
Or address a conduct which need not addressing lest we're back to an adherence of do's and don'ts rather than a one on one relationship with the Lord. (Note Romans 14 below)
Jesus gave more do's than dont's. I believe he wants us to be a "do Bee" more than a "don't Bee."
But how many hear his voice and follow in obedience if God has to God say not to do something.
Honestly, if a person likes to take a sunday or saturday every weekend, so be it. Or a Tuesday, or a Friday.
It's beneficial to take a day of rest for health purposes which replenishes the temple of God.
Then again if you have a job where you must work on that day or else you no longer have a job to provide for your family, which law holds more? The moral one or the judicial one?
If the Law was never intended to save, and Abraham was saved by belief, then why does Paul spend so much time telling the Pharisees the Law doesn't save? Because they falsely thought it did. If it was never intended to save, yet God keeps telling His people to do it, He's saying that it doesn't conflict with grace.
If you refer to the 10 commandments, I agree, that law does not conflict with grace.
In fact it may even contribute to making one even more graceful
Just a small clarification, Jesus didn't just say He fulfilled it, He told His disciples to do the Law and to teach others to do it as well. We can't just spiritualize the Law when Jesus said to do it as well.
Matthew 5:17
Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Fulfill:
1
to do what is required by
to succeed in achieving
to succeed in achieving 2
a : to put into effect : execute
b : to meet the requirements of (a business order)
c : to bring to an end------->interesting how many grab at this one definition while overlooking all the others
d : to measure up to : satisfy
3
a : to convert into reality
b : to develop the full potentialities of
And I agree with just about everything you said here. Obedience to the Sabbath or Law cannot, and never was intended to earn salvation. So if folks are following the Law for that purpose, then they're works are useless. But just because some people misinterpreted the Law and it's purpose doesn't mean it is done away with completely. It still serves a purpose for us today, and we are still told to follow it, just not for salvation's sake.
We must not worship and learn of our Lord with half truths. There are truths here, but when you say this is all God tells us about the law, and that you have the full story, it makes it a half truth not the truth.that's an outright lie, as far as i can see.
as for "doing away with" the law? whatever. nobody puts it that way. the law had a purpose. i see it's purpose in the words of those ppl who think they obey it. it reveals sin.
Why, then, was the law given at all? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise referred had come.
The Law came in so that the transgression would increase; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more, so that, as sin reigned in death, even so grace would reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God.
Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God's sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin.
The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise. For if the inheritance depends on the law, then it no longer depends on the promise; but God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise.
1) And where do you find a verse that states that without a verse using your specific language,Absolutely I do, but just because something is a shadow of something greater doesn't mean we ignore it, especially when God never says to. John originally asked you to show some verses where God said to stop celebrating the Sabbath. The verses you mentioned didn't say anything about NOT celebrating the Sabbath. If you're going to say that God tells us to stop celebrating the Sabbath, then you need to find verses that say just that. It's not enough to try and rationalize it out using shadows, especially when Jesus told His disciples to follow the Law. Unless you can find a verse where Jesus says to stop following the Law or the Sabbath, you're reaching a little bit to try and say that He is, especially when there is a verse where He says to keep doing it.
I again would agree. and while I'm here would like to clarify just to prevent any possible misunderstanding.
I wasn't suggesting you to be dull, I include myself in that definition as well because in comparison to God we are all dull.
And in spite of this, I believe God holds us to higher expectations to aspire to.
To not be complacent in our walk with God
But to seek his will and not interpret the scriptures to please ourselves but rather to please God.
Yet keeping the sabbath on a certain day of ritual for some reason I have no conviction of because I place my rest in Christ. For his yoke is light and his burden not heavy.
The requirement of sacrificial offerings for the sabbath such as was kept before (note two below) have been completed/finished.
Numbers 28
On the Sabbath day, make an offering of two lambs a year old without defect, together with its drink offering and a grain offering of two-tenths of an ephah of the finest flour mixed with olive oil.
Ezekiel 46:4,5
And the burnt offering that the prince shall offer to the LORD in the sabbath day shall be six lambs without blemish, and a ram without blemish.
This is not to remove accountability for our sins since there are still sins which we will answer for yet do not lead to death
...since Christ was the last sacrifice required for atonement of our sins which lead to death.
Hebrews 10:18
And where these have been forgiven, sacrifice for sin is no longer necessary.
So why would we keep a special day as a sabbath day?
Is one day different from another anymore.
Should not all days be set aside equally for the Lord?
Romans 14
5One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike. Each of them should be fully convinced in their own mind.But there are still sins which do not lead to death which we are still held accountable to(will answer for)
Christ became our sacrificial offering for the Sabbath day, Christ did not take away the Sabbath day. When we and the world were created, a pattern was set up we are to follow. God worked six days and rested on the seventh, He blessed the seventh day for our benefit. There is no scripture that orders that stopped. We are to rest in Christ, depend on Him, but that does not say don't work six days and give the seventh to simply depend on God not your work. How can you both work six days and set six days aside for a Sabbath?The requirement of sacrificial offerings for the sabbath such as was kept before (note two below) have been completed/finished.
This is not to remove accountability for our sins since there are still sins which we will answer for yet do not lead to death
...since Christ was the last sacrifice required for atonement of our sins which lead to death.
Hebrews 10:18
And where these have been forgiven, sacrifice for sin is no longer necessary.
So why would we keep a special day as a sabbath day?
Is one day different from another anymore.
Should not all days be set aside equally for the Lord?
Romans 14
5One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike. Each of them should be fully convinced in their own mind.But there are still sins which do not lead to death which we are still held accountable to(will answer for)
A command from God is different than a descriptive word from man, and therefore doesn't have the same criteria for Biblical accuracy.1) And where do you find a verse that states that without a verse using your specific language,
it cannot be Biblical.
Where do you find a verse that states God is "sovereign"? Or "triune"? Or "relational"?
I honestly could care less what "doctrine" says. Doctrine is man's interpretation of what God says and who He is. I prefer to let God's own words speak for Himself, especially when it is plainly stated.2) There are many truths of the NT that are not stated in the specific language of the doctrine.
This is your own principle, it is not a Biblical one.
3) If you understood Paul, you would understand the Biblical place for OT shadows in the light of their NT realities.
Okay. . .now I get it.A command from God is different than a descriptive word from man, and therefore doesn't have the same criteria for Biblical accuracy.
I honestly could care less what "doctrine" says. Doctrine is man's interpretation of what God says and who He is. I prefer to let God's own words speak for Himself, especially when it is plainly stated.
And in that same vein, if you understood Jesus, you would understand that He plainly told His disciples to do and teach the Law forever. (Matthew 5). If you think Paul is saying something different than Jesus' words in Matthew 5, then it's possible you are elevating Paul's words over Jesus' words.
Okay. . .now I get it.
Let me remind you that Paul's words are the words spoken by the Son in these last days (Heb 1:1-2)
through the NT writers.
I don't buy into the "conflict model" between Jesus and Paul. . .and I'm sorry that this is your case. . .
so I'm out on this.
And in that same vein, if you understood Jesus, you would understand that He plainly told His disciples to do and teach the Law forever. (Matthew 5). If you think Paul is saying something different than Jesus' words in Matthew 5, then it's possible you are elevating Paul's words over Jesus' words.
And I pray and trust that isn't the case.
idolatry is exactly what we are dealing with here...there was a perfect example of this in another thread recently...someone posted this...
my response was this...
it is really time we started calling this by what it really is...namely -sabbath idolatry-!
God have mercy on this sick and twisted people that say abiding in the government of our Creator is a cult. Give us the grace and wisdom to know the truth from a lie.
God have mercy on this sick and twisted people that say abiding in the government of our Creator is a cult. Give us the grace and wisdom to know the truth from a lie.
In your posts you have said over and over that you do not understand the shadows as an outline of NT realities.P.S.
Or better yet. . .
If you understood the revelation spoken by the Son in these last days (Heb 1:1-2) through Paul,
You would understand the Biblical place for OT shadows in the light of their NT realities.
What does the Lord Jesus say in Matthew 5?