It Is satanic Heresy to Deny Eternal Security

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Where is your text that says man can guarantee his faith. Furthermore, etenal life is NOT salvation.
The scripture does not require man to guarantee his faith, but to believe in the Savior. The Lord is the one who makes the guarantees.

Salvation includes eternal life.

Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sake, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory. Faithful is the saying: For if we died with him, we shall also live with him:

God so loved the world that He gave His only Son that whosoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life.

What must I do to be saved?
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, & you shall be
saved.

Believing in Christ brings eternal life;
Believing in Christ brings salvation.
Salvation is not something everyone has.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
[SUP]27 [/SUP]My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
[SUP]28 [/SUP]And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
So when I see "hear my voice" and "follow Me" no one has to tell me he means obey, but if you don't see the written word you don't get the spirit of the word because everything is literal to you.
NewB, the hearing and follow are not conditions for the never perish.

4 facts are stated about the sheep:

1) they hear His voice [know it is not a stranger's voice],
2) they follow (but not necessarily without exception),
3) He gives them eternal life,
4) They will never perish.

3 & 4 do not depend on 1 & 2.
There is no IF in the passage.

Why fight it?
Don't you want to accept the security that the Psalmist of Ps 23 had?
Could the adulterer, murderer King David have said that?
Could He have been forgiven & had security -- even if chastised severely?

Surely goodness & mercy shall follow me all the days of my life,
And I shall dwell in the House of the LORD forever!
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
And you are dismissing the scripture simply because it does not use the exact words you think it should? That is hilarious.
.
Off topic scripture is off topic. Nothing is said about anyone being saved or losing salvation. Debating the implications & how much (if any) free will men have, cannot negate what scripture teaches about the perseverance of the saint. And also, "free will" does not occur in the passage. So it is irrelevant.

Now for those who care, this is relevant:

Thou shalt call His name Jesus, for He shall save his people from their sins.

I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish.

He Who began a good work in you will complete it.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Re: Eternal Security: Very . . . Verily

Atwood,
I urge you to go to Jer 31 and see if there are conditions on men in the New Covenant. The Lord works in His redeemed to will and to do.
there are conditions in every covenant. That is a covenant.
The Lord sure does work in us to do His will. It speaks agains both issues running in this thread at the moment. It upholds man's free will and it shows that God does not force man in any way. Man is free to accept God's influence through the Holy Spirit, or reject it. God cannot and will not force man against his own will. He made us that way.
Remaining faithful? Peter denied the Lord, but Peter's essential trust in the Lord Jesus, did not fail -- for Christ sustained it with intercession. Falling away is a reality, apostasy; but 1 John 2 tells us that apostasy proves one was never saved to begin with. You theorizing about free moral agency and difficulty enduring, has no force whatsoever vs God's promise.
Peter repented. The fact that he did deny Christ, if not repented of, even with Jesus's prayer, he could still resist and not repent. There are many examples in scripture where repentance is not shown and scripture explicitly states that the person would be assigned with unbelievers.
but 1 John 2 tells us that apostasy proves one was never saved to begin with
of course when you change the meaning of the word, it fits. How quaint. But one cannot be in apostasy UNLESS one was part of the group to which He apostasized. YOu should look up those terms.
You theorizing about free moral agency and difficulty enduring, has no force whatsoever vs God's promise.
true if one holds to predestination. Man cannot be a moral agent. But that is in a different Bible than the Gospel according to Christ.
Yes, there is a condition to salvation & to eternal security: whoever believes. When the Lord Jesus spoke this initially, whoever standing there who was believing fulfilled that condition, just like, whoever is wearing brown sandals. Had he said, "Whoever is wearing brown sandals will go to Heaven," then all who were then wearing brown sandals would have fulfilled the condition.
Unless one dies at that moment it would not be true. Man must continue to believe, to the end. It is continuous, and active. But unfortunagely, man falls away from believing and becomes an unbeliever. Notwithstanding predestination, scripture teaches that we are in a covenantal relationship and both parties have obligations to meet. YOu consistanly present God's promises to man, but have yet to present any promises of man that he can guarantee his faith. We are being saved through our faith.
But it is obviously a general truth, not meant to be limited to the immediate audience. Whoever . . . believes . . . has eternal life. The present belief gains a life that never ends. And the assurance is added that he does not come into any future judgment. The passing from death (being estranged from God) to life (vital connection to God) has been accomplished. The guarantee is that in the future there is no condemning judgment. That is eternal security.
depends on how long a life you live after initial faith. That faith must continue to the end in order to inherit eternal life. It is not granted on the basis of a one-time, long ago affirmation but continuous to the end.

Why fight it?
cannot fight something that does not exist. Never has existed and never will in scripture.

So where is the evidence of ES. You never come around with any evidence. All you present are God's promises and then assume a predestined status without ever showing that God has actually predestined anyone to eternal life.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
ES does not exist is scripture as it was originally given.
Falsehood!

אך טוב וחסד ירדפוני כל ימי חיי ושבתי בבית יהוה לארך ימים
κἀγὼ δίδωμι αὐτοῖς ζωὴν αἰώνιον καὶ οὐ μὴ ἀπόλωνται εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Re: Eternal Security: Very . . . Verily

Atwood,
there are conditions in every covenant.
Cassian, you just did your sola Cassiana again!
Now prove it.

Prove that there are conditions in the New Covenant, Jeremiah 31.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Re: Eternal Security: Very . . . Verily

Atwood,
ever showing that God has actually predestined anyone to eternal life.

Romans 8:
foreknew >foreordained >called >justified >glorified.

Regardless of what you think of predestination,
scripture is clear on eternal security.

I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish.

The gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Atwood,

The scripture does not require man to guarantee his faith, but to believe in the Savior. The Lord is the one who makes the guarantees.
not only DOES NOT REQUIRE it, because it is impossible. Which is why ES is false. In order for ES to exist in scripture, with a covenant consisting of two parties they must both guarantee their obligations to complete the covenant. Man cannot do this which is why the NT is filled with exhortations to remain faithful. We need to test ourselves to make sure we are still IN Christ, that we have not faltered and fell from Christ.

Salvation includes eternal life.
it was the purpose of salvation that God could offer man union with Him again. Salvation was for the world, Christ redeemed the world, gave life to the world, so that all men could have the opportunity to freely join and accept God's offer to come, all men were granted eternal existence, all men will be raised in the last day to stand in judgement. They will be asigned either to heaven or hell. If there is no salvation from death which Christ gave to the world through His Incarnation and resurrection there could be no eternal life. Salvation is what man could not do. Having a relationship with Christ is what we were created to have and saved to have with God, freely entered into.

God so loved the world that He gave His only Son that whosoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life.
What must I do to be saved?
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, & you shall be saved.
Believing in Christ brings eternal life;
Believing in Christ brings salvation.
Salvation is not something everyone has.
that's because that is the whole plan in a nutshell. That was the purpose of why Christ came to have man join with Him. But it is two separate events that occur. Rom 12-18 states that quite clearly. Rom 5:12 is the condemnation of death through Adam to all men, vs 15 we are told it is a gift. vs 18 tells us that the gift was life to all men. I Cor 15:12-22 also makes the equation. All those that died through Adam shall be made alive through Christ. One cannot possibly have eternal life with Christ unless one has an etenral existence. The condemnation of death through Adam to all mankind/ the world, dust to dust precluded any eternal existence.

I might add that if they are one and the same thing, then we do have a wholly new form of Universalism whereby all those Christ died for and saved from death will alos be given eternal life with Him. That is even better than Universalism as understood historically who believed in the existence of hell and many would go to hell.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Off topic scripture is off topic. Nothing is said about anyone being saved or losing salvation. Debating the implications & how much (if any) free will men have, cannot negate what scripture teaches about the perseverance of the saint. And also, "free will" does not occur in the passage. So it is irrelevant.

Now for those who care, this is relevant:

Thou shalt call His name Jesus, for He shall save his people from their sins.

I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish.

He Who began a good work in you will complete it.
what is good for the goose is good for the gander...... Where are the words "eternal security" in any of the above????
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Atwood,

I might add that if they are one and the same thing, then we do have a wholly new form of Universalism whereby all those Christ died for and saved from death will alos be given eternal life with Him. That is even better than Universalism as understood historically who believed in the existence of hell and many would go to hell.
Again, Dear Cassian, you seem to have done a sola Cassiana, because you don't quote scripture & argue from it.

So are you coming out of the closet now & saying you are a universalist (an extreme form of ES)?
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Falsehood!

אך טוב וחסד ירדפוני כל ימי חיי ושבתי בבית יהוה לארך ימים
κἀγὼ δίδωμι αὐτοῖς ζωὴν αἰώνιον καὶ οὐ μὴ ἀπόλωνται εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα.
Who changed scripture? It does not have ES now, why would it have it in the beginning unless someone changed it. Who changed it?
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Safe in the arms of Jesus,
Safe in His tender care;
There by His love o'er-shadowed, ...

Good night.
May the Love of Christ constrain you.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Again, Dear Cassian, you seem to have done a sola Cassiana, because you don't quote scripture & argue from it.

So are you coming out of the closet now & saying you are a universalist (an extreme form of ES)?
Of course, the scripture I used and explained would not exist in your Bible. It seems only a couple of verses exist in yours.
But it is you that wants to be a Universalist. A wholly new concept than the historical one that was condemned. You now want to be one of those men, sola scripturists who developes a whole new theory on salvation. Bypassing hell completely.
Go for it, it cannot be any worse then the other theories you hold.
 
A

Alligator

Guest
And you are dismissing the scripture simply because it does not use the exact words you think it should? That is hilarious.

This scripture, provided by newbirth, deals you a "double whammy" that you can't possibly overcome. Not only does it
Deal a death blow to OSAS, it does, contrary to what you say, also prove free will. How much proof do you need? Would it really matter? You would simply give some kind of foolish rebuttal like you did above.
Off topic scripture is off topic. Nothing is said about anyone being saved or losing salvation. Debating the implications & how much (if any) free will men have, cannot negate what scripture teaches about the perseverance of the saint. And also, "free will" does not occur in the passage. So it is irrelevant.

Now for those who care, this is relevant:

Thou shalt call His name Jesus, for He shall save his people from their sins.

I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish.

He Who began a good work in you will complete it.
It's funny watching you try to worm your way out of this. It is a perfect example of free will whether
you like it or not. Your excuses get worse and worse. Give them up.

as far as the three scriptures you listed, I have refuted them but as usual you just ignore it.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
It's funny watching you try to worm your way out of this. It is a perfect example of free will whether
you like it or not. Your excuses get worse and worse. Give them up.

as far as the three scriptures you listed, I have refuted them but as usual you just ignore it.
Just give him time. He is close now to having rejected most of the NT.
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
NewB, the hearing and follow are not conditions for the never perish.

4 facts are stated about the sheep:

1) they hear His voice [know it is not a stranger's voice],
2) they follow (but not necessarily without exception),
3) He gives them eternal life,
4) They will never perish.

3 & 4 do not depend on 1 & 2.
There is no IF in the passage.

Why fight it?
Don't you want to accept the security that the Psalmist of Ps 23 had?
Could the adulterer, murderer King David have said that?
Could He have been forgiven & had security -- even if chastised severely?

Surely goodness & mercy shall follow me all the days of my life,
And I shall dwell in the House of the LORD forever!
who said anything about if ...the word and connects all...these cannot be separated. you have split the scripture to get your meaning. When they are all connected it works against your ES so you make a split so hearing and following will not be a requirement to obtain eternal life.
This is your ouote in post #2701...
Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sake, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory. Faithful is the saying: For if we died with him, we shall also live with him:
you wanted an if well here is one...


 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Salvation is God, by grace through faith, giving eternal life in place of eternal death.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The OP has no mention of faith much less exercising it. Actually the OP is linked more toward OSAS than Christ. The ES theory is a spin off from OSAS...all doctrine of man
thats like the blind leading the blind.

To say eternal security (in Christ) is a doctrine of man. When it is based on Christ.

Quite the opposite. Saying MAN has to secure his own salvation is a doctrine of man, It is based off paganism and judaism, they all come from the same roots, which is satan.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Here is the question....Re: It Is satanic Heresy to Deny Eternal Security?<---YES

HAVING BEEN JUSTIFIED BY THE PERFECT FAITH OF CHRIST......!
they want to justify themselves. Their pride of their human nature can not be broken.
 

Galatians2-20

Senior Member
Mar 17, 2013
261
19
18
[/FONT]

Nonsense, I haven't changed my POV at all. To speak of eternal security as conditional is an oxymoron. You speak of insecure security! Let us not play with words, but do some serious trusting of the Savior.

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved.
Trust Him as SAvior, not as one who gives you a chance.

I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish.

Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life,
And I shall dwell in the House of the LORD forever.
There in lies your delima Atwood. You claim salvation is based soley on the works of Christ and is therefore unconditional but then you immediately place a condition on what you profess to be unconditional by insisting others believe in it in order to partake of if. Your line of thinking is quite contradictory and thus seriously flawed.

There is absolutely no way you can profess salvation to be unconditional and then place a conditions on it. It's time that you are confronted with your own hypocricy; either you admit that faith is the prerequisite of salvation / eternal security and therefore conditional ~ OR ~ you stop insisting that one believe in it in order to be saved. So which is it?

To remove faith as the prerequisite places you among the ranks of Universalists.
 
Last edited: