Elin
That's why I speak about the old and new involving the temple and the priesthood only.
Do you understand that the old covenant of Heb 8:13 is the Sinaitic Covenant,
and not the Abrahamic covenant?
Our obligations as children of God are defined both in the old and new covenant.
But there are no obligations of the children of God defined in the new covenant of Jer 31:31-35.
The only obligation of the
new covenant is the
law of Christ (Mt 22:37-40) which covers
everything.
Through Christ we have a better promise for sure, and I'm not disputing that, but
what I speak has everything to do with the temple and the priesthood that is so much better.
But what Heb 8:6-13, 9:15 speaks (which is the topic under discussion)
has everything to do with the
NT covenant that is so much better.
God still requires the same obedience from His children in Spirit as stated in the Old Testament.
Love is first mentioned as a requirement in the Old Covenant same as the New Covenant.
Keeping in mind that the law of Moses is
subordinate to the law of grace (Mt 22:40).
Romans 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid : yea, we establish the law.
Yes,
Paul established the law on its right basis,
subordinate to the law of
grace.
Galatians 3:21 - "Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid : for
if there had been a law given which could have given life ,
verily righteousness "would" have been by the law."
The KJV, et al, use "would."
Yes, the law
is righteous, but
no one is made righteous
by the law,
because no one can keep it well enough to b
e made righteous
by it.
Your point?
Isaiah 59:21 As for me, this is my covenant with them, saith the LORD; My spirit that is upon thee, and
my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor
out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed's seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever.
And that's the same description God gave of the new covenant (Jer 31:31-34) made in Christ (Is 42:6, 49:8, 9:7; Heb 8:6-13, 9:15).
That is a promise of the new covenant.
Peter addresses the multitude defining the covenant that God made with there forefathers.
Acts 3:20-25
20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:
21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers , A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.
23 And it shall come to pass , that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.
24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken , have likewise foretold of these days.
25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers,
saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed (singular; i.e., Christ) shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed.
And we learn from revelation of Jesus Christ personally given to Paul
that God's
promise here was made to Abraham and to
Christ only (Gal 3:16, 22),
and that it was
not made in
covenant.
And Peter goes on:
26
When God raised up his servant (Jesus) he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.
Peter is pointing out to his Jewish audience in Ac 3:20-26 that God kept his promise.
Peter is simply recalling their history leading up to Jesus coming to them as promised.
Your point?
Deuteronomy 18:15 The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken ;
And that was Jesus, right? . .the Jesus who inaugurated the n
ew covenant (Lk 22:20), right?
Your point?
Genesis 26:4 And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed ;
The covenant I speak of is as stated above, and was given, starting with Abraham. That has not changed.
Right, Heb 8:13 is not referring to the
Abrahamic covenant as obsolete.
It is referring to the Sinaitic Covenant as obsolete, which was added (Gal 3:19; Ro 5:20)
temporarily (Heb 8:13) to the Abrahmaic covenant.
the covenant with Abraham and the generations that followed never was disannuled, or waxed old, as Peter declared in the scripture reference I quoted. I call it the plan of salvation that was conceived before the world began. The covenant was for Israel only then, but now it's for the world.
Do you think Heb 7:18-19, 8:13 are referring to the
Abrahamic covenant?
You don't understand Heb 8 at all, do you?
For you are mixing up the Sinaitic and Abrahamic covenants?
The law is not against grace
The law of Moses is
subordinate to the law of grace.
or faith, but the temple and the priesthood have been changed.
The Aaronic priesthood has been changed in that it has been
replaced with the order of Melchizedek,
with Christ Jesus as the n
ew eternal High Priest,
not from the tribe of Levi.
The old is gone, and the new is here to stay.
I do not set the Word of God against itself.
But you do, in denying a change in the Mosaic covenant to the new covenant in Heb 8:6-13, 9:15,
and bringing all the material in this post against it.
Yet nothing here shows that the old covenant is not obsolete (Heb 8:13).
One cannot put new wine into old skins, but old wine can be put into new skins.
I'll make a note to tell Jesus about that.
I'm sure it was just an oversight on his part.
NOT. . .Jesus was quite clear about what goes in the new wine skins.
We are not at liberty to "improve" on the Word of God, bringing it into agreement with our own notions.
The new wine is the new covenant.