Nothing new about the "new" covenant?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 19, 2014
117
3
0
Re: Gods covenants

Yes, the disciples attended the Jewish feasts, no so much to keep them,
as to preach the gospel to the multitudes that were required to attend them (e.g., Ac 2:5-40).
It sounds like Paul kept the feasts.

Acts 18:21 But bade them farewell, saying, I must by all means keep this feast that cometh in Jerusalem: but I will return again unto you, if God will. And he sailed from Ephesus.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
You need to review Ro 9-11.i

Lotta' ignorance of the NT going on here.
Elin you keep saying we are born again allready,

11(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)

that is an deception
 
Aug 19, 2014
117
3
0
That's kinda' lame, don't you think?

"Sounds like" is without merit.

The facts of the actual statement are what matter.
I said they were breaking the Law. The scripture says they are sinning which is transgressing the law. Which in turn breaks the covenant.

Then you said
Let's not alter the Word of God in Jer 11:10 to fit our own fancies.

What is the source of all these distortions of the Word of God?
That is being legalistic when they mean the same thing.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
You need to review Ro 9-11.i

Lotta' ignorance of the NT going on here.
Unlearned? ignorance? ignore maybe?
Why are you so intent on seperateing the word of God into segments? There was a physical application, and there is a Spiritual application, but nothing that God has ever spoken is nullified. If Jesus is the creator of all things, do ya think He was also the instigator of every covenant defined in the Bible? We mentioned Hebrews over and over, never coming to an agreement. Let me mention one more passage in Hebrews.

Instead of Hebrews 8:13, I present Hebrews 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
if anyone thinks God has done away with his people Isreal,

who all of the conents are given to, are mistaken.

all of Gods Sabbath feasts that he gave to man will be done his way again soon.


23
And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another,

and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
In Jer 11:10, Israel broke the berith, which is covenant, not the law.

In breaking the covenant, they nullified it.

Let's not alter the Word of God in Jer 11:10 to fit our own fancies.

What is the source of all these distortions of the Word of God?
Psalm 89:39 Thou hast made void the covenant of thy servant: thou hast profaned his crown by casting it to the ground.

David is talking about the covenant God made with him. God never pronounced making it void.
This is the only scripture, that I can find, in the old testament that talks about making a covenant void.
The language of the covenant itself voids the covenant when the terms aren't met.

Conditional bilateral covenants are based on "if. . .then."

The language of the covenant gives the conditions which nullify it; i.e.,

no if. . .no then.

No compliance with the "if"--circumcision of the flesh and heart. . .
the covenant is broken and there will be no "then"--I will be your God, etc.

No compliance with the "if"--Dt 7:12, 26:17. . .
the covenant is broken and there will be no "then"--Dt 7:12, 26:17.

Jer 11:10 declares the Sianitic covenant is broken, and

Jer 31:31-34 promises a new covenant (Heb 8:8) to take its place (Heb 8:7).

The only ones who inherit the promise of the Abrahamic covenant are those
whose hearts are circumcised; i.e., those who are in Christ (Gal 3:29).
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Re: Gods covenants

There is a difference between holy days and feasts.
It's not found in the Bible.

Trumpets and atonment are observed also, but are not feasts. Trumpets contain 9 days and atonement 5.
Lev 23:2 states that all eight holy seasons are "feasts" (moed) and "holy convocations" (miqra).

What is your Biblical warrant for stating any of them are not feasts?
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Re: Nothing new about the "new" covenant ?

apostles preached the gospel everyday, they did not say here feast everyday, feast was past

1
Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.
2Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things,
and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.


20
When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.
21For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken.

22What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not.

they where breaking bread (eating a meal)everyday honoring lords supper,

Jesus said that was wrong,
Read it again. . .you got it wrong.

we keep it once a year , on feast day
only those worthly where allowed to keep it.
Elin said:
the sacrifices for sin were daily
so the feasts days of God was yearly
what does sacrifices have to do with it,
Previously addressed in post #133,
here.

Pay attention.

 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
Re: Gods covenants

Yes, observant Jews kept the OT feasts in Jerusalem until its destruction ~40 years
after the gospel, and the Jewish calendar was still their reference point.

yes until rome made there calander and made ester day so they not have to follow the jews
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Re: Gods covenants

It's not found in the Bible.


Lev 23:2 states that all eight holy seasons are "feasts" (moed) and "holy convocations" (miqra).

What is your Biblical warrant for stating any of them are not feasts?
Leviticus 23:2-8
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, Concerning the feasts of the LORD, which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts.
3 Six days shall work be done : but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, an holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of the LORD in all your dwellings.
4 These are the feasts of the LORD, even (along with) holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons.
5 In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover.
6 And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the 1. feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread.
7 In the first day ye shall have an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein. 8 But ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD seven days: in the seventh day is an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein.

Leviticus 23:15-16
15 And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; 2. (feast of weeks) seven sabbaths shall be complete:
16 Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye (Pentecost/Shavuot on the 50th day) number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the LORD.

Leviticus 23:34-39
34 Speak unto the children of Israel, saying , The fifteenth day of this seventh month shall be the 3.feast of tabernacles for seven days unto the LORD.
35 On the first day shall be an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein.
36 Seven days ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD: on the eighth day shall be an holy convocation unto you; and ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD: it is a solemn assembly; and ye shall do no servile work therein
37 These are the feasts of the LORD, which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, to offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD, a burnt offering, and a meat offering, a sacrifice, and drink offerings, every thing upon his day:
38 Beside the sabbaths of the LORD, and beside your gifts, and beside all your vows, and beside all your freewill offerings, which ye give unto the LORD.
39 Also in the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when ye have gathered in the fruit of the land, ye shall keep a feast unto the LORD seven days: on the first day shall be a sabbath, and on the eighth day shall be a sabbath.

as mentioned above in the scriptures, there are 3 feasts, and confirmed below they are listed.

Exodus 23:14 Three times thou shalt keep a feast unto me in the year.

Deuteronomy 16:16 Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before the LORD thy God in the place which he shall choose ; in the 1. feast of unleavened bread, and in the 2. feast of weeks, and in the 3. feast of tabernacles: and they shall not appear before the LORD empty:

And as I mentioned previously
2 Chronicles 8:13 Even after a certain rate every day, offering according to the commandment of Moses, on the sabbaths, and on the new moons, and on the solemn feasts, three times in the year, even in the 1.feast of unleavened bread, and in the 2. feast of weeks, and in the 3. feast of tabernacles.
 
Last edited:

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,782
2,952
113
The "New" Covenant


Hebrews 8:10-13
10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:


11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.


12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.


13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.


Also found in:


Jeremiah 31:31-34
31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:


32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord:


33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.


34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.


However, if we see in the greek text we find that the word "new" is not really new in the sense of it never existing before but rather new in quality.


Hebrew 8:13 (KJV)
In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.


In greek text this verse translates as:


Hebrew 8:13 (Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550)
ἐν τῷ λέγειν Καινὴν πεπαλαίωκεν τὴν πρώτην· τὸ δὲ παλαιούμενον καὶ γηράσκον ἐγγὺς ἀφανισμοῦ


The definition:


2537 kainós – properly, new in quality (innovation), fresh in development or opportunity – because "not found exactly like this before."


3501 néos – new ("new on the scene"); recently revealed or "what was not there before" (TDNT), including what is recently discovered.


3501 /néos ("new on the scene") suggests something "new in time" – in contrast to its near-synonym (2537 /kainós, "new in quality").


Now if it said neos then I can take it as new as it never existing before but it doesn't use neos.


Additionally, this "new" covenant was already established with the house of Isreal. Therefore, it cannot be "new".


I've broken down the "new" covenant.


Hebrew 8:
10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:


Deuteronomy 6:6
And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart:


Exodus 6:7
7 And I will take you to me for a people, and I will be to you a God: and ye shall know that I am the Lord your God, which bringeth you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians.


Hebrew 8:
11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.


Isaiah 54:
13 And all thy children shall be taught of the Lord; and great shall be the peace of thy children.


Hebrew 8:
12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.


Psalms 103:
8 The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy.
9 He will not always chide: neither will he keep his anger for ever.
10 He hath not dealt with us after our sins; nor rewarded us according to our iniquities.
11 For as the heaven is high above the earth, so great is his mercy toward them that fear him.
12 As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.


Someone please explain how the new covenant is "new". I think, Ideally the "old" covenant was always intended to be followed by heart but the people had hearts of stone, and in turn were unable to grasp the purpose of his commandments. They tried to keep them by their means which failed horribly.


Ezekiel 11:
19 And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh:


20 That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God.


Now if we look at the "new" commandment found in John 13:34 we find the same Greek word for new.


John 13:34 (KJV)
34 A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.


John 13:34 (Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550)
ἐντολὴν καινὴν δίδωμι ὑμῖν ἵνα ἀγαπᾶτε ἀλλήλους καθὼς ἠγάπησα ὑμᾶς ἵνα καὶ ὑμεῖς ἀγαπᾶτε ἀλλήλους


But again it was previously commanded.


Leviticus 19:
18 Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord.


I know there are other verses that have the same "new" word and I find it interesting how it changes meaning, point, etc. but maybe that should be for another thread. I just wanted to put my two cents on the "new" covenant. If someone has a different understanding feel free to reply.
This is the problem with not understanding Greek and using internet tools, instead of scholarly books!!

καινός or kainos in A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature by Bauer and Danke in the nominative case means the following.

1. Pertaining to being in existence for a relatively short time; new, unused eg. Matt 9:17, Mark 2:22, Luke 5:58, Matt 27:60, Mark 2:21, Luke 5:36, Matt. 13:52.

2. Pertaining to being not previously present, unknown, strange, remarkable. eg. Mark 1:27, Acts 17:19, John 13:34, 1 John 2:7, Mark 16:17, Acts 17:21.

3. Pertaining to that which is recent in contrast to something old; in the sense that what is old has become obsolete, and should be replaced by what is new; eg. Matt 26:28, Mark 14:24, Luke 22:20, 1 Cor. 11:25, 2 Cor. 3:6, Hebrews 8:8, 13; 9:15 2 Peter 3:13, Rev. 21:1, etc.

Neos or νέος only appears once in the New Testament, in SBL and Stephanus in Luke 5:37.

"[SUP]37 [/SUP]και ουδεις βαλλει οινον νεον εις ασκους παλαιους ει δε μηγε ρηξει ο νεος οινος τους ασκους και αυτος εκχυθησεται και οι ασκοι απολουνται." Luke 5:37

"And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. If he does, the new wine will burst the skins and it will be spilled, and the skins will be destroyed." Luke 5:37

Neos has the alternate meaning of "younger."

Please do not make doctrinal statements based on a very faulty knowledge of Koine Greek!



 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Re: Gods covenants

It sounds like Paul kept the feasts.

Acts 18:21 But bade them farewell, saying, I must by all means keep this feast that cometh in Jerusalem: but I will return again unto you, if Go will. And he sailed from Ephesus.
To accommodate the Jews (1Co 9:20), Paul bound himself for a time with the Nazarite vow
to avoid wine, strong drink and cutting of his hair.
He needed to go to Jerusalem to complete the rites required when his vow was fulfilled (Ac 21:24, 26).

This particular incident was not about keeping a feast,
but about going to Jerusalem for another reason at the time of the feast.

And yes, we know Paul accommodated himself to the Jews by keeping some of the observances.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
As I understand it, the feast of tabernacles involve the understanding of all that God has ever done, and all He is going to do. It is a major convocation during the millennial reign. This feast was given in the Old Testament as a rehearsal for that future time, and should be practiced with its teaching for the church today.

Zechariah14:16-19
16 And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.
17 And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.
18 And if the family of Egypt go not up , and come not, that have no rain; there shall be the plague, wherewith the LORD will smite the heathen that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.
19 This shall be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all nations that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
Re: Nothing new about the "new" covenant ?

Read it again. . .you got it wrong.



Previously addressed in post #133,
here.

Pay attention.
no that post still does not say what you want.

34And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation.
And the rest will I set in order when I come.

they where eating a meal,

28But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.

only worthy people to partake.

2Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, (and keep the ordinances,)
as I delivered them to you


18For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there
be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.



23For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you,
That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread:

24And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said,
Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.


25After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying,
This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.

do this on the night to be most remembered, in honor of blood sacrifice

 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
You need to review Ro 9-11.

That's chapters 9, 10, 11.

Lotta' ignorance of the NT going on here.
Elin you keep saying we are born again already,

11(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)

that is an deception
You think Ro 9:11 refers to the spiritual rebirth of Jn 3:3?

Read chps 9, 10, 11 of Romans and get back to me.

I'm curious, are you an American citizen?

 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
I said they were
breaking the Law. The scripture says they are sinning which is transgressing the law. Which in turn
breaks the covenant.

Then you said

Let's not alter the Word of God in Jer 11:10 to fit our own fancies.

What is the source of all these distortions of the Word of God?
That is being legalistic when they mean the same thing.
They don't mean the same thing unless the law is the terms of the covenant,

which it was not in the Abrahamic covenant.

So you think accurate interpretation of text is legalistic?

Where did you learn hermeneutics?

It just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser. . .
 
Aug 19, 2014
117
3
0
Re: Gods covenants

He needed to go to Jerusalem to complete the rites required when his vow was fulfilled (Ac 21:24, 26).

This particular incident was not about keeping a feast,
but about going to Jerusalem for another reason at the time of the feast.

And yes, we know Paul accommodated himself to the Jews by keeping some of the observances.
Paul was not even told to take the vow until he was in Jerusalem. Why would he need to go for the feast to keep a vow he did not even know about yet? Also Paul was not a hypocrite. If he kept the observances he did not do it because of how others felt. Paul keeping the observances to accommodate some Jews is pure speculation. He would have kept the observances all along and took the vow to show his fruit.

Acts 21:17-26

[SUP]17 [/SUP]When we arrived at Jerusalem, the brothers and sisters received us warmly. [SUP]18 [/SUP]The next day Paul and the rest of us went to see James, and all the elders were present. [SUP]19 [/SUP]Paul greeted them and reported in detail what God had done among the Gentiles through his ministry.

[SUP]20 [/SUP]When they heard this, they praised God. Then they said to Paul: “You see, brother, how many thousands of Jews have believed, and all of them are zealous for the law. [SUP]21 [/SUP]They have been informed that you teach all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to turn away from Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or live according to our customs. [SUP]22 [/SUP]What shall we do? They will certainly hear that you have come, [SUP]23 [/SUP]so do what we tell you. There are four men with us who have made a vow. [SUP]24 [/SUP]Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. [SUP]25 [/SUP]As for the Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality.”

[SUP]26 [/SUP]The next day Paul took the men and purified himself along with them. Then he went to the temple to give notice of the date when the days of purification would end and the offering would be made for each of them.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Unlearned? ignorance? ignore maybe?
Why are you so intent on seperateing the word of God into segments? There was a physical application, and there is a Spiritual application, but
nothing that God has ever spoken is nullified.
You are nullifying his declaration of nullification.

When God gives the terms of nullification, and they are met, his commitment is nullified.

Sorry you don't agree with the Scriptures.
 
Last edited:
Aug 19, 2014
117
3
0
They don't mean the same thing unless the law is the terms of the covenant,

which it was not in the Abrahamic covenant.

It just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser. . .
When did we start talking about the Abrahamic covenant? You said yourself that they broke the Sinaitic covenant in Jer 11.

The Sinaitic covenant required obedience to the Mosaic law (Dt 7:12),
and was broken and nullified by the people(Jer 11:1-5, 10-11, 14; Heb 8:8).
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Re: Nothing new about the "new" covenant ?

Leviticus 23:2-8
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, Concerning the feasts of the LORD, which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts.
3 Six days shall work be done : but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, an holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of the LORD in all your dwellings.
4 These are the feasts of the LORD, even (along with) holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons.
5 In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover.
6 And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the 1. feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread.
7 In the first day ye shall have an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein. 8 But ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD seven days: in the seventh day is an holy convocation: ye shall do no servile work therein.

Leviticus 23:15-16
15 And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; 2. (feast of weeks) seven sabbaths shall be complete:
16 Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye (Pentecost/Shavuot on the 50th day) number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the LORD.
They are all called feasts in Lev 23:2, and they were Sabbath holy convocations.

How many times does Lev 23 have to be say it before it is true?

Or where is Lev 23:2 revoked?

You simply do not believe Lev 23:2.