Even if such is true, then you still have no right whatsoever to twist or wrest Paul's words as recorded in I Corinthians 14:34-35 as an alleged "proof text" for the same and I'll publicly and personally call you or anybody else out every time that any of you seek to do the same.
"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." (I Corinthians 14:34-35)
Again, CONTEXTUALLY, Paul was specifically addressing WIVES who were to inquire of THEIR HUSBANDS AT HOME. Yes, CONTEXTUALLY, these are the "women" for whom it was "a shame to speak in the church". Again, this is precisely why Paul alluded to Genesis 3:16 as his "proof text" for the same and, again, there, we read:
"Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." (Genesis 3:16)
Again, THE CONTEXT of this "command" (I Corinthians 14:34) is that of A HUSBAND AND HIS WIFE and nothing that you or anybody else on the face of the earth could ever say is going to change THIS FACT. If you think for even a moment that God was speaking of "all women" here, then, quite frankly, you're out of your mind. In no way, shape or form would God ever be talking about "bringing forth children" OUTSIDE OF THE CONTEXT OF MARRIAGE. Furthermore, when God told Eve that her "desire" was going to be TO HER HUSBAND, He wasn't suggesting that she was somehow going to be "desiring" Adam in some sort of romantic way. No, rather, her "desire" was directly related to her "desire" to RULE OVER ADAM and God therefore countered the same by saying "and he shall RULE OVER thee". In fact, we see this same exact type of Satanically inspired "desire" being spoken of in the very next chapter of Genesis where we read:
Genesis chapter 4
[1] And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
[2] And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
[3] And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD.
[4] And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:
[5] But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
[6] And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
[7] If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.
Here, sin is actually PERSONIFIED ("HIS desire"..."over HIM") in that Cain "was of that wicked one" (I John 3:12) because he opened "the door" to Satan by refusing to "do well". Anyhow, my point is that Satan "desired" Cain in that he wanted to RULE OVER HIM and, again, for this very reason, God countered Satan's "desire" for Cain by admonishing Cain to "RULE OVER HIM".
Well, seeing how you mentioned "a meek and quiet spirit", again, I'll begin by addressing THE CONTEXT of the same:
I Peter chapter 3
[1] Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
[2] While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear.
[3] Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
[4] But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.
[5] For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
[6] Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.
Again, THE CONTEXT is that of WIVES BEING IN SUBJECTION TO THEIR OWN HUSBANDS and nothing that you or anybody else could ever say or suggest is going to change THIS FACT. Even in the example given, Sarah was Abraham's WIFE, so stop trying to make scriptures say that beyond which they actually do say. IOW, these scriptures do NOT pertain to "all women", but, rather, SPECIFICALLY TO WIVES IN RELATION TO THEIR OWN HUSBANDS. Seeing how you also mentioned how "a woman may prophesy" and how "it is also a shame for a man to have long hair", I'll now address the portion of scripture which deals with the same:
I Corinthians chapter 11
[1] Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.
[2] Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.
[3] But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
When Paul said that "the head of the woman is the man", CONTEXTUALLY, what was he saying? Was he somehow referring to "all women" as you suggest? No, he was not and I'll not only prove the same FROM THE IMMEDIATE CONTEXT of Paul's words, but also FROM THE CONTEXT of what Paul said elsewhere in relation to the same. For example, elsewhere, we read:
Ephesians chapter 5
[22] Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
[23] For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
[24] Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
[25] Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
[26] That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
[27] That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.
[28] So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
[29] For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:
[30] For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
[31] For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
[32] This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
[33] Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.
Again, THE CONTEXT is that of WIVES AND THEIR OWN HUSBANDS. Yes, IN THIS CONTEXT, "the husband is the head of the wife" or "the head of the woman is the man" (I Corinthians 11:3). Having established the same which will only be confirmed as we continue on with THE IMMEDIATE CONTEXT of what follows in I Corinthians chapter 11, we read:
I Corinthians chapter 11
[4] Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
[5] But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
[6] For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
[7] For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
[8] For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
[9] Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
[10] For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
[11] Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.
[12] For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of god.
[13] Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
[14] Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
[15] But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
[16] But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.
Again, that THE IMMEDIATE CONTEXT is that of A HUSBAND AND HIS OWN WIFE ought to be obvious in that Paul alluded all the way back to THE FIRST HUSBAND AND WIFE, Adam and Eve, in that Adam "was the image and glory of God: but the woman", Eve, "was the glory of the man", Adam (vs. 7). Again, "the man", Adam, "was not of the woman", Eve, "but the woman", Eve, "was of the man", Adam (vs. 8), in that she was made from Adam's rib. Furthermore, "neither was the man", Adam, "created for the woman", Eve, "but the woman", Eve, "was created for the man", Adam (vs. 9), to be his helpmate. With such a CONTEXTUAL reality before us, what was Paul actually seeking to teach here? Well, while addressing the topic of God-given authority, Paul set the order in the following manner:
1. God is Christ's head (I Corinthians 11:3).
2. Christ is the head of every man or, CONTEXTUALLY, the head of every husband (I Corinthians 11:3).
3. The man or, CONTEXTUALLY, the husband is the head of the woman or, CONTEXTUALLY, his own wife.
IOW, the God-given order of delegated authority ought to look like this:
God
Christ
Husband
Wife
What, then, happens to this God-given order of delegated authority if/when a man's wife usurps his God-given authority over her? Well, the God-given order of delegated authority now gets perverted and looks like this:
God
Christ
Wife
Husband
IOW, now that a man's wife has usurped his God-given authority over her, spiritually or figuratively speaking, she has now "covered his head" by coming between him and his delegated head, Christ, and, spiritually or figuratively speaking, he now has his wife's "long hair" in that she has now become his "covering". At the same time, seeing how the man's wife has removed her spiritual covering, her own husband, Paul says that if such is not shameful, then she ought to also remove her natural covering or her long hair by shaving her head.
THIS is what Paul was actually discussing here and THIS was all said in relation to the relationship between A MAN AND HIS OWN WIFE, so, again, neither you nor anybody else has any right whatsoever to somehow twist or wrest scriptures such as these in your attempts to make them somehow apply to "all women" in all circumstances. Yes, everything that I've just covered pertains directly to "the great mystery" which Paul wrote of in his epistle to the Ephesians. Again, we read:
Ephesians chapter 5
[31] For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
[32] This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
[33] Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.
Yes, when God ordained marriage all the way back "in the beginning" or all the way back in Genesis, He ordained for the natural union between a man and his own wife to mirror the spiritual union between Christ, the Bridegroom, and his church, the bride. As such, any husband who refuses to lay down his own life for his own wife as Christ did for the church is, figuratively speaking, teaching THE WORLD that Christ refuses to lay down His life for the church. Similarly, any wife who refuses to submit to and reverence her own husband is, figuratively speaking, teaching THE WORLD that the church need not submit to or reverence Christ.
This isn't a game, folks, and whether we're husbands or wives, we will all have to give an account before Christ one day in regard to how we either properly represented Him and His church TO THE WORLD or in regard to how we misrepresented Him and His church TO THE WORLD in relation to the same. We'd all be wise to lay these truths up in our hearts and to live accordingly.