For setting the words of Christ against themselves. . .heresy.
How about for setting the words of Paul against the words of Christ?
That is heresy.
For setting the words of Christ against themselves. . .heresy.
Heresy. . .If the author of Acts were impartial enough, why it pointed Peter's hypocrisy and lacked impartial source to say if Paul had several failures we, Christians, often bypassed?
As for me, Paul's letters are not enough fair or exact to be a trustworhy part of the NT.
Agreed. . . .
I want you to know, I did not mean you said that, I did put A question mark as to illustrate what direction do we go from there...
This I agree with 100% more if it were possible.
But here is the thing, if He left us the written words for a reason, and how did we learn of Messiah, we were told, but we read, we learned, we prayed? Right? Is it evil if I read what Messiah says/teaches and think, Im going to pray to have the strength to follow that?
Reading the words until it is bound to ones souls IS ONLY THE BEGINNING, listen to lying pastors and not reading is ERROR.
I have read the Scripture a ton and know people that have read it way ore than me, im a rookie I know, but a diligent rookie.
and im not downing anyone, BUT I have never met a human tha knew the word without reading it, that is why when people isolate Paul they get lost. and please don't jump on me for saying that, for Peter says that.
If the author of Acts were impartial enough, why it pointed Peter's hypocrisy and lacked impartial source to say if Paul had several failures we, Christians, often bypassed?
As for me, Paul's letters are not enough fair or exact to be a trustworhy part of the NT.
Setting the Scriptures against themselves is heresy.
Jesus lived and taught under the OT.
He presented nowhere near the full teaching of his new order (Heb 9:10)
I find the question as possibly deceitful, I may be wrong. But could I not ask if you were a "non Messiah"?
Because I am not willing to throw out everything the Messiah said for Paul, who made errors? Not Paul's words are not a blender to destroy the words of the Messiah, for the Messiah is the ONE we must hear and obey...
John 12:48, "He who rejects Me, and does not follow My words has One Who judges him. The word that I have spoken, the same will be used to judge him in the last day."
Is Paul the prophet we must hear and obey? Because Scripture makes it clear that while all prophets and all Scripture is there for our learning, there is ONLY ONE that YHWH says WE MUST HEAR AND OBEY. Would you comfort my heart by posting the passage where that is stated, and explain to me if you believe that passage? (I ask SINCERELY)
I am a ENTIRE WORD believer, believing this passage also: (do you believe this passage?)
2 peter 3:15-17, "And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability."
See the bolded blue above.So what are you saying,Elin said:This principle is problematic.Hizikyah said:Paul should be understood as being filtered through Messiah,
not Messiah filtered through Paul,
Jesus lived and taught under the OT.
He presented nowhere near the full teaching of his new order (Heb 9:10)
in his new covenant (Lk 22:20), for he had not yet died, and
there was yet no basis for the full gospel of his atoning death (Ro 3:25).
He personally gave massive new revelation of the full gospel to Paul, which we find in Paul's writings,
which are the words spoken by the Son in these last days (Heb 1:1-2) in the NT writers.
Jesus' first NT revelation (the gospels) is not adequately understood apart from
his second NT revelation which more fully develops it through the NT writers.
To set Jesus' revelation through the NT writers in the gospels against
Jesus' revelation through the NT writers in the epistles is heresy.
Jesus does not contradict himself in the gospels and the epistles.
If one does not understand the gospels and epistles in harmony,
then one does not correctly understand the NT.
Setting the Scriptures against themselves is the root of the problem here.
For setting the words of Christ against themselves. . .heresy.
As do I. . . . .You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to kennethcadwell again.
I cannot overstate how much I agree with this post.
Agreed. . .The big guns on the subject...
Tit 1:16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
Precisely.Kinda like setting Paul's teachings against Christ's?
Yes. . . . . .Do the people that disagree with me believe this passage?
2 peter 3:15-17, "And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability."
Agreed. . .How about for setting the words of Paul against the words of Christ?
That is heresy.
You are guilty of the very thing that Peter was defending Paul writings for .... though Paul had to Openly Rebuke Peter Before All for siding with the Jews in Galatians 2.
"Hard to understand" - FOR YOU! is what Peter is saying!
Don't know how to say it any other way. . .Somehow, I don't think you really agree...Elin said:Agreed. . .
Yes. . . . . .
Rejected by the followers of Messiah for standing on Messiah words....
Not true. Rejected because you don't trust Yahoshua to have HAND PICKED PAUL FOR A DIVINE AND PERFECT MINISTRY and have placed your own understanding Over Yahoshua's choice of the most used man that YHWH had chosen to affect the "whole world" as HIS representative and write half of His New Covenant by.
No - you have "rejected" YHWH's key man of the Book of the New Covenant.
Paul was a bonified MARTYR ----------- YOU ARE NOT and need to get off of this high horse mentality of spiritual pride above the man, Paul of YHWH's choosing.
Peter does not say Paul's writings cause lawlessness.I just want to confirm I am understanding you.Elin said:Yes.Hizikyah said:Do the people that disagree with me believe this passage?
2 peter 3:15-17, "And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability."
So you agree that Paul's writing are hard to understand to those not fully learned in the word, and that a effect of
his writing being hard to understand causes some people to fall into Lawlessness*?
*" You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people"