HIZIKYAH'S TOPIC: DID PAUL SIN [DESPITE BEING T DESIGNATED HUMAN EXAMPLE IN THE NT]?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
K

Karraster

Guest
#81
Oh, I know. I can't make people see or hear what the Spirit is saying, just as it is written that "a man can receive nothing except it be given him from heaven." Jesus said the old wine skin cannot receive the new wine until it is made a new wine skin. So I fully understand why they can't receive His testimony.
what is old wine? what is new wine? TIA
 
C

ChristIsGod

Guest
#82
In 2 Corinthians 12:16 Paul says:

2 Corinthians 12:16,

New International Version
Be that as it may, I have not been a burden to you. Yet, crafty fellow that I am, I caught you by trickery!

New Living Translation
Some of you admit I was not a burden to you. But others still think I was sneaky and took advantage of you by trickery.

English Standard Version
But granting that I myself did not burden you, I was crafty, you say, and got the better of you by deceit.

New American Standard Bible
But be that as it may, I did not burden you myself; nevertheless, crafty fellow that I am, I took you in by deceit.

King James Bible
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
Now granted, I have not burdened you; yet sly as I am, I took you in by deceit!

International Standard Version
Granting that I have not been a burden to you, was I a clever schemer who trapped you by some trick?

NET Bible
But be that as it may, I have not burdened you. Yet because I was a crafty person, I took you in by deceit!

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
And perhaps I was not a burden to you, but as a crafty man I robbed you by treachery.

Jubilee Bible 2000
But be it so, I did not burden you; nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.

King James 2000 Bible
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I took you with guile.

American King James Version
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.

American Standard Version
But be it so, I did not myself burden you; but, being crafty, I caught you with guile.

Douay-Rheims Bible
But be it so: I did not burthen you: but being crafty, I caught you by guile.

Darby Bible Translation
But be it so. *I* did not burden you, but being crafty I took you by guile.

English Revised Version
But be it so, I did not myself burden you; but, being crafty, I caught you with guile.

Webster's Bible Translation
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.

World English Bible
But be it so, I did not myself burden you. But, being crafty, I caught you with deception.

Young's Literal Translation
And be it so, I -- I did not burden you, but being crafty, with guile I did take you;

2 Corinthians 12:16

Text Analysis
[TABLE="class: maintext"]
[TR]
[TD="class: top"]Strong's[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 20%"]Transliteration[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%"]Greek[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%"]English[/TD]
[TD="class: top, width: 21%"]Morphology[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1510 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]Estō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]Ἔστω[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]be it so[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-PMA-3S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1161 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]de[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]δέ,[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]however,[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1473 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]egō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἐγὼ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]I[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]PPro-N1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3756 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]ou[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]οὐ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]not[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Adv[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2599 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]katebarēsa[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]κατεβάρησα[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]did burden[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-AIA-1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]4771 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]hymas[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ὑμᾶς·[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]you;[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]PPro-A2P[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]235 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]alla[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἀλλὰ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]but[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Conj[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]5225 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]hyparchōn[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ὑπάρχων[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]being[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-PPA-NMS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]3835 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]panourgos[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]πανοῦργος[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]crafty,[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]Adj-NMS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]1388[e]
[/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]dolō[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]δόλῳ[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]by trickery[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]N-DMS[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]4771 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]hymas[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ὑμᾶς[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]you[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]PPro-A2P[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: strongsnt"]2983 [e][/TD]
[TD="class: translit"]elabon[/TD]
[TD="class: greek2"]ἔλαβον.[/TD]
[TD="class: eng"]I caught.[/TD]
[TD="class: pos"]V-AIA-1S[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


1388 - dolosStrong's Concordance
dolos: a bait, fig. craft, deceit
Original Word: δόλος, ου, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: dolos
Phonetic Spelling: (dol'-os)
Short Definition: deceit, guile, treachery
Definition: deceit, guile, treachery.

John 10:27, "My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me."

John 7:16-17 "Yahshua answered, them, and said: My doctrine is not Mine, but His Who sent Me. If any man will do His will, he will know about this teaching--whether it comes from Yahweh, or whether I am speaking of My own authority."

​Paul's defense against his accusers in this chpt ...

2Co 12:14 Behold, the third time I am ready to come to you; and I will not be burdensome to you: for I seek not yours, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children.
2Co 12:15 And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.
2Co 12:16 But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile. [ That is, as my enemies represent.]
2Co 12:17 Did I make a gain of you by any of them whom I sent unto you?


..... nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile; so say the false apostles of me; for these are not the words of the apostle in his own person; nor to be understood of any spiritual craft, or lawful cunning and prudent artifices used by him, to allure and draw the Corinthians into a good liking and opinion of the Gospel and of his ministry, and so caught them, and was the happy means of their conversion; but they are spoken in the person of the false apostles, charging him with a wicked and criminal craftiness, by making use of other persons in a sly underhanded way, to get this church's money, when he pretended to preach the Gospel freely; to which he answers in the next verse - vs 17. Here Paul asks whether he had defrauded them by means of anyone whom he had sent to them.

Note, 1. It is a debt we owe to good men to stand up in the defence of their reputation; and we are under special obligations to those we have received benefit by, especially spiritual benefit, to own them as instruments in God's hand of good to us, and to vindicate them when they are calumniated by others. 2. How much soever we are, or ought to be, esteemed by others, we ought always to think humbly of ourselves. See an example of this in this great apostle, who thought himself to be nothing, though in truth he was not behind the greatest apostles - so far was he from seeking praise from men, though he tells them their duty to vindicate his reputation - so far was he from applauding himself, when he was forced to insist upon his own necessary self-defence.
II. He gives a large account of his behaviour and kind intentions towards them, in which we may observe the character of a faithful minister of the gospel. 1. He was not willing to be burdensome to them, nor did he seek theirs, but them. He says (2Co_12:13) he had not been burdensome to them, for the time past, and tells them (2Co_12:14) he would not be burdensome to them for the time to come, when he should come to them. He spared their purses, and did not covet their money: I seek not yours but you. He sought not to enrich himself, but to save their souls: he did not desire to make a property of them to himself, but to gain them over to Christ, whose servant he was. Note, Those who aim at clothing themselves with the fleece of the flock, and take no care of the sheep, are hirelings, and not good shepherds. 2. He would gladly spend and be spent for them (2Co_12:15); that is, he was willing to take pains and to suffer loss for their good. He would spend his time, his parts, his strength, his interest, his all, to do them service; nay, so spend as to be spent, and be like a candle, which consumes itself to give light to others. 3. He did not abate in his love to them, notwithstanding their unkindness and ingratitude to him; and therefore was contented and glad to take pains with them, though the more abundantly he loved them the less he was loved, 2Co_12:15. This is applicable to other relations: if others be wanting in their duty to us it does not follow therefore that we may neglect our duty to them. 4. He was careful not only that he himself should not be burdensome, but that none he employed should. This seems to be the meaning of what we read, 2Co_12:16-18. If it should be objected by any that though he did not himself burden them, yet, being crafty, he caught them with guile, that is, he sent those among them who pillaged them, and afterwards he shared with them in the profit: “This was not so,” says the apostle; “I did not make a gain of you myself, nor by any of those whom I sent; nor did Titus, nor any others - We walked by the same spirit and in the same steps.” They all agreed in this matter to do them all the good they could, without being burdensome to them, to promote the gospel among them and make it as easy to them as possible.


2Co 7:2 Receive us; we have wronged no man, we have corrupted no man, we have defrauded no man.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#83
This prinicple is problematic.

Jesus lived and taught under the OT.
I have to stop you right there.

That is falsehood.

Matt 24:35, “Heaven and earth may pass away, but My teachings will not pass away."

Saying His teaching are OT" is... I will just say 100% wrong.

John 12:48, "He who rejects Me, and does not follow My words has One Who judges him. The word that I have spoken, the same will be used to judge him in the last day."

Paul really has become people father...


1 Corinthians 4:15-16, "For though you have countlessb guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father (3962. patér) in Christ Jesus through the gospel. I urge you, then, be imitators of me."

Matthew 23:9, "And call no man your father (3962. patér) on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven."
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#84
Rejected by the followers of Messiah for standing on Messiah words....
 

ISeeYou

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2015
794
11
0
#85
I find the question as possibly deceitful, I may be wrong. But could I not ask if you were a "non Messiah"?

Because I am not willing to throw out everything the Messiah said for Paul, who made errors? Not Paul's words are not a blender to destroy the words of the Messiah, for the Messiah is the ONE we must hear and obey...

John 12:48, "He who rejects Me, and does not follow My words has One Who judges him. The word that I have spoken, the same will be used to judge him in the last day."

Is Paul the prophet we must hear and obey? Because Scripture makes it clear that while all prophets and all Scripture is there for our learning, there is ONLY ONE that YHWH says WE MUST HEAR AND OBEY. Would you comfort my heart by posting the passage where that is stated, and explain to me if you believe that passage? (I ask SINCERELY)

I am a ENTIRE WORD believer, believing this passage also: (do you believe this passage?)

2 peter 3:15-17, "And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability."
That all I needed to know Hizikya, it started to dawn on me when I read the title of your thread, but then the disregard of Pauls words and the mis quoting Jesus so to knock Pauls words down.

There are those who believe Paul is a false apostle and all conversations are not about incorporating the words of Paul in with Jesus words but causing them to contradict since what he says might not fit into their own understanding as Elin beautifully points out.

You will be the first on my ignore list here, I do believe this is a dangerous doctrine
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#86
Re: HIZIKYAH'S TOPIC: DID PAUL SIN [DESPITE BEING T DESIGNATED HUMAN EXAMPLE IN THE

Lord Jesus 3 1/2 years of His earthly ministry was not for the OT saints, they were teachings of how all of us under the new covenant are to do and walk in !!!


If anybody tells you that what the Lord said in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John was not for you/us. Then I would suggest you remove yourself from that person and/or church, and find a true bible based church as His teachings were for all under the New Covenant.

Lord Jesus said in the great commission of Matthew 28 that we are to observe/obey all of His teachings !!!
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#87
If the author of Acts were impartial enough, why it pointed Peter's hypocrisy and lacked impartial source to say if Paul had several failures we, Christians, often bypassed?

As for me, Paul's letters are not enough fair or exact to be a trustworhy part of the NT.
 
K

Karraster

Guest
#88
Rejected by the followers of Messiah for standing on Messiah words....
not to mention...where is Atwood? Is it customary for a member (Atwood in this case) to start a thread for another member (Hiz in this case) to force him to defend himself?????? an edited post from another thread indeed.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#89
That all I needed to know Hizikya, it started to dawn on me when I read the title of your thread, but then the disregard of Pauls words and the mis quoting Jesus so to knock Pauls words down.

There are those who believe Paul is a false apostle and all conversations are not about incorporating the words of Paul in with Jesus words but causing them to contradict since what he says might not fit into their own understanding as Elin beautifully points out.

You will be the first on my ignore list here, I do believe this is a dangerous doctrine
LOL

Do you like the color red?

Yeah I do

Ohh that too bad you dont like the color red...

Show me where I misquoted the Messiah and I will repent.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#90
not to mention...where is Atwood? Is it customary for a member (Atwood in this case) to start a thread for another member (Hiz in this case) to force him to defend himself?????? an edited post from another thread indeed.
Thank you.

The funny part is I was told to depart from a thread WITH MY NAME IN THE TITLE... that was started by another member, as you say Atwood, and im the bad guy.... I get called out and im wrong to reply...
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#91
Lord Jesus 3 1/2 years of His earthly ministry was not for the OT saints, they were teachings of how all of us under the new covenant are to do and walk in !!!


If anybody tells you that what the Lord said in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John was not for you/us. Then I would suggest you remove yourself from that person and/or church, and find a true bible based church as His teachings were for all under the New Covenant.

Lord Jesus said in the great commission of Matthew 28 that we are to observe/obey all of His teachings !!!
Thank you for defending HIS WORDS.

Yahchanan (John) 14:23, "Yahshua answered, and said to him: If a man loves Me, he will keep My teachings and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him."
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
#92
This prinicple is problematic.

Jesus lived and taught under the OT.
He presented nowhere near the full teaching of his new order (Heb 9:10)
in his new covenant (Lk 22:20), for he had not yet died, and
there was yet no basis for the full gospel of his atoning death (Ro 3:25).

He personally gave massive new revelation of the full gospel to Paul, which we find in Paul's writings,
which are the words spoken by the Son in these last days (Heb 1:1-2) in the NT writers.

Jesus' first NT revelation (the gospels) is not adequately understood apart from
his second NT revelation which more fully develops it through the NT writers.

To set Jesus' revelation through the NT writers in the gospels against
Jesus' revelation through the NT writers in the epistles is heresy.

Jesus does not contradict himself in the gospels and the epistles.
If one does not understand the gospels and epistles in harmony,
then one does not correctly understand the NT.

Setting the Scriptures against themselves is the root of the problem here.
So what are you saying, disregard all of His teachings and instead of Christianity, we must adopt Paulianity?

If (and he did not, but if he did) Paul spoke anything that does not line up perfectly with Jesus Christ's teachings, then whose teachings should we throw out? Christ's?

That seems to be the way it is portrayed? Peter even warned us of the difficulty of some of Paul's letters...

2Pe 3:15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
2Pe 3:16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
2Pe 3:17 Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.
2Pe 3:18 But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen.

Peter emphasizes that we must grow in grace and KNOWLEDGE which necessitates much study and prayer.

What does Paul himself say?

1Co 11:1 Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.

Notice the clause there? As I also am of Christ? Means to follow Paul AS he follows Christ, if he deviates, don't follow him.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#93
Hizikyah said:
Paul should be understood as being filtered through Messiah,
not Messiah filtered through Paul
,
This principle is problematic.

Jesus lived and taught under the OT.

He presented nowhere near the full teaching of his new order (Heb 9:10)
in his new covenant (Lk 22:20), for he had not yet died, and
there was yet no basis for the full gospel of his atoning death (Ro 3:25).

He personally gave massive new revelation of the full gospel to Paul, which we find in Paul's writings,
which are the words spoken by the Son in these last days (Heb 1:1-2) in the NT writers.

Jesus' first NT revelation (the gospels) is not adequately understood apart from
his second NT revelation which more fully develops it through the NT writers.

To set Jesus' revelation through the NT writers in the gospels against
Jesus' revelation through the NT writers in the epistles is heresy.


Jesus does not contradict himself in the gospels and the epistles.
If one does not understand the gospels and epistles in harmony,
then one does not correctly understand the NT.

Setting the Scriptures against themselves is the root of the problem here.
I have to stop you right there.

That is falsehood.

Matt 24:35, “Heaven and earth may pass away, but My teachings will not pass away."
Setting the Scriptures against themselves is heresy.
 
Last edited:

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
#94
Lord Jesus 3 1/2 years of His earthly ministry was not for the OT saints, they were teachings of how all of us under the new covenant are to do and walk in !!!


If anybody tells you that what the Lord said in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John was not for you/us. Then I would suggest you remove yourself from that person and/or church, and find a true bible based church as His teachings were for all under the New Covenant.

Lord Jesus said in the great commission of Matthew 28 that we are to observe/obey all of His teachings !!!
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to kennethcadwell again.

I cannot overstate how much I agree with this post.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
#95
The big guns on the subject...

Tit 1:16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#97
If the author of Acts were impartial enough, why it pointed Peter's hypocrisy and lacked impartial source to say if Paul had several failures we, Christians, often bypassed?

As for me, Paul's letters are not enough fair or exact to be a trustworhy part of the NT.
My issue is mainly with his writing style, it is confusing especially if one is not grounded in the ENTIRE WORD. Paul could recite the fist 5 books by heart, he quoted the "OT" more times than I care to count, and he is the only one singled out IN SCRIPTURE as being "hard to understand"

But if I dont throw caution to the wind reject everything else in Scripture im wrong?.... THIS IS SO CRAZY TO ME.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#99
Do the people that disagree with me believe this passage?

2 peter 3:15-17, "And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability."