Plato, Aristotle, St. Augustine and St. Thomas: Masters of Theology

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#41
Do you understand justice?

Is it the honor of government that is being defended when a criminal is punished with prison?
The fact that the sinner is perceived as a criminal deserving punishment and not as an ill person deserving help is also a catholic/protestant mentality most probable influenced by the greek philosophy.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#42
Well basically you have two schools of interpretation that are opposites. The allegorical school and the historical-grammatical school which takes a more literal approach. You can research the difference, I personally prefer the literal approach unless the allegory is spelled out in Scripture.

Amen,

ie, use scripture to interpret scripture, not mens ideas of what scripture says to interpret scripture.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#43
The fact that the sinner is perceived as a criminal deserving punishment and not as an ill person deserving help is also a catholic/protestant mentality most probable influenced by the greek philosophy.
in reality, Both are scripturally based.

A sinner is ill, and he is deserving of punishment,

No way around this fact.


Jesus is not only called the great healer of souls. but the savior of mankind, by taking their punishment on his body (justification, redemption, propitiation are all legal terms)
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#44
I don't disagree, but the Christian form of ascetism you speak of has more sources than the Greek philosophers. If I remember correctly, Gnostics, Zoroastrians, and various pagan sects held similar beliefs. It seems to be a common trait among unregenerate man to view the corporeal as fundamentally evil, the ultimate good, or the ultimate manifestation of existence.
I didn't speak about the "christian form of asceticism", but about the practice of physical penitences. It is not the same thing. I think the gnostics also were influenced by platonicism and stoicism. The european culture is highly influenced by the Roman and Greeks, not by the gnostics.

In Christianity, the body not only it is not despised, but the christians held to the belief and hope that their bodies will be resurrected.
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#45
The fact that the sinner is perceived as a criminal deserving punishment and not as an ill person deserving help is also a catholic/protestant mentality most probable influenced by the greek philosophy.
Can the sinner not be both/and? Perhaps growing up in a fire and brimstone household has clouded my thought process in this regard, but God's need to punish wickedness is as prominent as His compassion for those mired in sin. Both are aspects of His sovereignty.
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#46
in reality, Both are scripturally based.

A sinner is ill, and he is deserving of punishment,

No way around this fact.


Jesus is not only called the great healer of souls. but the savior of mankind, by taking their punishment on his body (justification, redemption, propitiation are all legal terms)
Not everything that is "scripturally based" is also correct. All heresies are "scripturally based".
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#47
Can the sinner not be both/and? Perhaps growing up in a fire and brimstone household has clouded my thought process in this regard, but God's need to punish wickedness is as prominent as His compassion for those mired in sin. Both are aspects of His sovereignty.
God needs to punish sin just as a doctor needs to proceed a hurtful (but saving!) operation. Your sin does not touch God's holiness. If you pray, if you fast, if you go to church etc., you do it because YOU need this, not God.
 

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
#48
In Christianity, the body not only it is not despised, but the christians held to the belief and hope that their bodies will be resurrected.
To be fair, that would depend on who you talk to, about the body being despised. Many point to the body as a temple, as Paul did, to support the idea that one must take care of their body.

And by resurrected, they mean the body after it has passed away, resurrected at the last judgment. It is HOPE for a better existence WITH a body.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#49
The fact that the sinner is perceived as a criminal deserving punishment and not as an ill person deserving help
is also a catholic/protestant mentality most probable influenced by the greek philosophy.
That makes it a Christian mentality, as found in Ro 3:9-20, 8:5-8 regarding those who are not born again.

You either believe the bible, or you don't.
The born again do.

Evidently, you don't.

It's a choice.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#50
Not everything that is "scripturally based" is also correct. All heresies are "scripturally based".
Thats why you take scripture literally.

Are you saying that scripture does not say what I said?


and I would disagree, A scriptural based doctrine is not a doctrine based on a few verses, it is a doctrine based on scripture as a whole.
 

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
#51
That makes it a Christian mentality, as found in Ro 3:9-20, 8:5-8 regarding those who are not born again.
Is it possible Paul himself, who wrote this, was influenced? That's the point - the writers and later those who read them, drew ideas from other places. Perhaps subtly and even unconsciously. Psychology is starting show that when we have an original idea, it can be traced back to a previous understanding - that we may have forgotten, but made its way into our work.

After all, did Paul not debate with Greek philosophers? He had a direct source.
 
Last edited:

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#52
That makes it a Christian mentality, as found in Ro 3:9-20, 8:5-8 regarding those who are not born again.

You either believe the bible, or you don't.
The born again do.

Evidently, you don't.

It's a choice.
I believe the Bible. I don't believe it/understand it as you do.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
#53
The doctrine itself would state the same thing no matter who wrote it.

Style doesn't alter revelation.
Certainly! now, the statements would be in the form of language, I think you would agree. And, language is affected by time and place, culture, etc... so, for example, when John writes 'logos' in the opening verse, that word has baggage, history... and some of that history is from the greek philosophers... so I've read...
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#54
God needs to punish sin just as a doctor needs to proceed a hurtful (but saving!) operation.
Not according to Jn 3:6; Ro 1:18, 5:9; Eph 5:6; Col 3:6; 1Th 1:10; Rev 9:15, where it is about disobedience.

Your sin does not touch God's holiness.
It "touches" (violates) his law (Mt 22:37-38) and is subject to his justice for disobedience of it (Eph 5:6).

If you pray, if you fast, if you go to church etc., you do it because YOU need this, not God.
Agreed. . .they are useless as a remedy for one's sin.

Only faith in the blood of Jesus Christ can save (Ro 3:25) one from God's wrath on the guilt of sin.
 
Last edited:
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#55
Salvation is a two fold process.

One must be justified (his penalty taken care of) before they can start to be spiritually healed (sanctified)

there will be no healing of any spiritual illness if one is not first declared judicially cleared of the penalty of sin.

And spiritual healing does not occur overnight, if it did, everyone who got saved would immediately be sinless, and never worry about anything ever again and they would continually be a person who is loving others 100% and never thinks of self.


Judicial aspect of salvation is forever the moment one is saved.

Medical, or spiritual healing part of salvation will not be complete until we enter heaven. it is a lifelong process which will not be realized in this lifetime.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#56
Is it possible Paul himself, who wrote this, was influenced?
Only if you don't believe Paul's testimony that what he wrote was received from Jesus Christ personally,
and don't believe 2Tim 3:16. . .keeping in mind that Peter grouped Paul's writings with
"the other Scriptures" (2Pe 3:16), showing that even in apostolic times the NT writings were considered
Scripture (1Tim 5:18 quotes the NT in Lk 10:7 as Scripture).
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#57
Elin said:
That makes it a Christian mentality, as found in Ro 3:9-20, 8:5-8 regarding those who are not born again.

You either believe the bible, or you don't.
The born again do.

Evidently, you don't.

It's a choice.

I believe the Bible. I don't believe it/understand it as you do
.
The Bible is propositional.

The meaning of the words in Ro 3:9-20, 8:7-8 are pretty clear.

I believe the Bible according to is words, understood in the context of the whole NT.

Are you saying you do not?
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#58
Certainly! now, the statements would be in the form of language, I think you would agree. And, language is affected by time and place, culture, etc... so, for example,
when John writes 'logos' in the opening verse, that word has baggage, history... and some of that history is from the greek philosophers... so I've read...
The word "logos" means precisely what it means in Greek.

It's not complicated.

"All Scripture is God-breathed" (2Tim 3:16), not man-breathed.
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#59
The Bible is propositional.

The meaning of the words in Ro 3:9-20, 8:7-8 are pretty clear.

I believe the Bible according to is words, understood in the context of the whole NT.

Are you saying you do not?
So did arians, nestorians and other heretics...
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#60
The word "logos" means precisely what it means in Greek.

It's not complicated.

"All Scripture is God-breathed" (2Tim 3:16), not man-breathed.
The word "logos" is more expressive than you make it look. Saint John says that Jesus Christ is the divine logos in a world dominated by very sophisticated greek philosophy. All the wisdom of the greeks become pale in front of the great wisdom of God (wisdom and love expressed not through books, but through the divine Logos -Jesus Christ).

For God so loved the world that He gave us His only begotten Son (not some philosophical books).