Agreed. . .God changed (terminated) the sacrifices, but that is not a change in God.The difference is the coming of Jesus at the right time to bring His own into the fold. The change is supposed to be us, not His word that will NEVER change. The change is that all mankind have the opportunity to come into His kingdom by simply believing in Him. It came to the Jews first and through Peter's revelation of the sheet from heaven vision with all manner of animals confirms this. That's the difference between the OT and the NT. We are grafted into the true Olive Tree in Christ Jesus by a circumcised heart. (Deuteronomy 10:16, 30:6 Jeremiah 4:4 ) It is for sure a better covenant because salvation is offered to the entire world in Spirit, not physical as it was with ancient Israel. Both OT and NT recognized "faith" as being the foundation of righteousness. Hebrews chapter 11.
The inspired Word is all from an UNCHANGING God. ONE GOD= ONE UNCHANGEABLE WORD.
And the epistles?The OT didn't record the life of our Lord as He hadn't come yet. He came to fully teach His commandments and lay down His life for His sheep. That is what the NT does, it fully teaches us about the Lord's commandments and how to obey them from the heart through the Spirit and out of love.
Do you know of a better one on earth anywhere?Bad things happen to bad people, and good things happen to the innocent. . . .This isn't necessarily so - just saying.
And I agree our justice and penal system stinks!!!!!
Baloney. . .God is Perfect, the old testament is not, the old testament is the image of the culture and uses of those early people and they accommodated God instructions to their convenience.
But Israel was made righteous by doing the commandments.
We all agree that Israel was rejected by God because they rejected His Torah/instructions/statues/law to follow other gods which is the doctrine of compromise called doctrine of Balaam. God promised blessing if they adhered to those instructions and cursings if they rejected them. Have we ever considered that the false doctrine of "separation of church and state" has been prevalent for years in the United States because we have also followed suit with Israel's failure? I'm not saying that the works of the law is for individual righteousness. I saying it contributes to proper self governing. That is only by faith in the word of God. Our forefathers in this country had that faith and wrote the constitution by that faith for the most part. Much of the principles listed in our constitution were taken from the Bible. Have we become so consumed with making the law void that we have set our country up for the same cursings as Israel in the OT?
"Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:" Romans 2:9-10
Deuteronomy 11:26-28
[SUP]26 [/SUP]Behold, I set before you this day a blessing and a curse;
[SUP]27 [/SUP]A blessing, if ye obey the commandments of the Lord your God, which I command you this day:
[SUP]28 [/SUP]And a curse, if ye will not obey the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside out of the way which I command you this day, to go after other gods, which ye have not known.
When we see the tribulation in full swing (and it's very close) think about the comparison between ancient Israel, and modern day America. It will happen because God doesn't change unless we do, and then He will repent of the evil against us because of His grace.
"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians 2:8-9
Actually it is the spiritual whoredom of unbelief, for which there is no forgiveness.
Until you understand all Scripture, not just the red letters, is God-breathed and is the word of God, you cannot correctly understand the Bible.Also before anyone goes into bringing up anything from Paul. This is our Messiah speaking, which to me trumps anything any apostle says, because the word of God is higher than that of man.
False. . .With that said I'm not saying Paul is wrong in his teachings, but
his teachings are hard to understand, Peter even warns us of this.
That's why you don't understand the Bible. . .and never will as long as you view it that way.That's why I take my teachings from the Messiah.
And this would be where Biblical truth figures into our discernment.This would be where discernment figures into our understanding.
There is no distinction between Jew and Gentile among those who are in Christ, all are one in Christ and on the same footing with God their Father.Prophecy says Israel is not a nation of the past that has forever been forsaken. Paul preaches that we should have the heart to be part of them, and them connected with us. Let us strive for that end which is God's will from the beginning. That's what the New Covenant requires of us.
Agreed. . .God changed (terminated) the sacrifices, but that is not a change in God.
Nor are any of the other changes from the OT to the NT.
No one thinks it is.
You are beating a dead horse.
Actually, he taught only two commandments (Mt 22:37-40; Ro 13: 8, 9, 10) as complete obedience to all the law and the prophets.I follow Torah, but I do not as a means of salvation. I do it as a means of obedience to God and His word. I have stated this in previous posts/threads. There is nothing wrong with Torah observance, but if one who is Torah observant tries to put oneself above others because the others are not, or vise versa, that is wrong on both sides.
Yeshua did not teach against Torah, He
taught Torah.
He has fulfilled all prophecy regarding God sending a Messiah.To add to the prophets part. Correct me if I'm wrong, but they propheci not just His first coming, but His second coming. So, like I've said, because Yeshua has not come a 2nd time, He has not fullfilled the prophecies.
No. . .it states that as long as heaven and earth exist, this principle exists--the law will not pass away until it is fulfilled.Ok, so let's look at it that way. Fine.
But for Torah to be completely done away with, it also states until earth and heaven have passed away.
He has fulfilled all prophecy regarding God sending a Messiah.
And that original plan and chronology included serious changes--change of the Levitical priesthood, cessation of the animal sacrifices, obsolescence of the old covenant. . .to name a few.Torah/God's law, not mans traditions are for the "lawless" for sure. Those that demand to be absent from Torah are lawless. No one can escape this truth.
Jesus never taught anything that was against His Father's original plan and chronology.
So you're referring to justice, no partiality. . .Call it uprightness if you will.
EQUITYek'-wi-ti:
Is synonymous with "uprightness," which is found in Proverbs 17:26 Isaiah 59:14 Malachi 2:6 in place of the King James Version "equity." Ecclesiastes 2:21 has "skilfulness" and the Revised Version, margin "success" for the King James Version "equity." The context favors this translation of kishron, which is derived from kasher, "to succeed."
Equity is the spirit of the law behind the letter; justice is the application of the spirit of equity; honesty is the general everyday use of justice or fairness, equity being the interior or abstract ideal. The Court of Equity overrides the Court of Common Law, deciding not upon terms, but the spirit of the deed.
"Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God's: and the cause that is too hard for you, bring it unto me, and I will hear it." Deuteronomy 1:17
"Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:" Acts 10:34
"For there is no respect of persons with God." Romans 2:11
"But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons." Colossians 3:25
"My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons." James 2:1
Actually, he taught only two commandments (Mt 22:37-40; Ro 13: 8, 9, 10) as complete obedience to all the law and the prophets.
God's people are "set apart" in the OT; i.e., set apart--from sin, and to God.The people in the wilderness, and in Israel were a set apart people for the work and purposes (as examples for/and) of God.
Paul explains that we are set apart in the same way that Israel was. (We, being grafted in.)
Set Apart defined by Strong's concordance from the above verse:
06395 // hlp // palah // paw-law' //
a primitive root; TWOT - 1772; v
AV - sever 2, separated 1, wonderfully 1, set apart 1, marvellous 1,
put a difference 1; 7
Yes, it means holiness, sanctification.So in Christ, we are to be examples, set apart, "peculiar," different....Israel was set apart for the same purpose and is a natural representation of what it means to be in the body of Christ.
Yes, the sheep of God and Christ are those who are born again.As the 23rd Palm says: "We are His people and the sheep of His pasture." (We are grafted in.)
Yet the original principle still stands..."feed my sheep." As Jesus told Peter after HE had risen from the dead, and as Paul also did in his ministry.
The priesthood changed, the sacrifices ceased, the old covenant was made obsolete, the law was fuilfilled in Christ, who came to fulfill it, and set aside (Heb 7:18-19), they being replaced with the new priesthood in the order of Melchizedek, the once-for-all sacrifice of Christ, the new covenant, the law of Christ (Mt 22:37-40; Gal 6:2; Ro 1:8, 9, 10).So what exactly do you believe changed in regards to feeding the sheep?
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness in light of all of itself.Do you believe that it's the revelation that comes only from Jesus that we are to be ( "feeding"/ sharing) For the building up and edification of the saints, by Christ in us?