D
seems like you didn't understand my post, which is entirely from Scripture, because it doesn't meet your 'formula', like the other one who missed it.
DesiredHaven got it, and others who know scripture got it , and I even "simplified" it for you who don't get english so well ....
so you still missed it. you are wrong, not me. if you need help finding the Scripture you missed or or not familiar with, I'll be glad to help you find it,
or simplify it even more if your still having trouble understanding english.
shalom !
DesiredHaven got it, and others who know scripture got it , and I even "simplified" it for you who don't get english so well ....
so you still missed it. you are wrong, not me. if you need help finding the Scripture you missed or or not familiar with, I'll be glad to help you find it,
or simplify it even more if your still having trouble understanding english.
shalom !
In otherwords, I felt certain the other couldnt be certain because I felt very uncertain. Which is actually being a tad biased towards my own uncertainty.
I do find you difficult to read, but some find me difficult to read as well, and maybe moreso because I blow their eyeballs off the page with my colors sometimes.
So I think, who am I to complain? Especially when I cant make out what someone else might be saying, which in your case could be more doctrinally related, but you were just not easy to understand. Which is why I dont.
I would always be interested in the scriptures you might set forth though.
To me, they make any points of the scriptures might be setting forth so much better then we can ourselves.
Thats my opinion, some think they can make the point better without the scriptures, so that would depend on the person.
No need to respond back but I wanted you to be made aware, and only because you made mention in your post being as one who understood. You were just giving me too much credit there is all.