Too funny, tis true, There is love in the red letters
View attachment 109006
I am comforted that there are people like me out there
View attachment 109007
Hey,that looks like my bible
Too funny, tis true, There is love in the red letters
View attachment 109006
I am comforted that there are people like me out there
View attachment 109007
Hey,that looks like my bible![]()

I randomly clicked on a YouTube religion video that sounded interesting, and I skipped forward 20 mins for no apparent reason, and it started talking about how a lot of the new bibles are missing passages, mostly dealing with Jesus Christ. A few of the more modern translations are missing up to 16 passages?!?! What is going on here? I NEVER would have noticed, I'm currently reading ACTS and I totally missed that my esv bible was missing acts 8:37. I thought this bible was great... It was much easier to understand what was going on.
How can it be that a bible misses the most important part of that entire section "37And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."
The odds that I would find that YouTube video, and skip forward to the exact part dealing with the bible and exact chapters of acts that I've been reading the last 3 or 4 days really have my head spinning!!
What else am I missing??
How do I choose the right bible then??
Is this common knowledge among christians? And if it is WTF can the reasoning behind it be?? I heard some say BC it probly wasn't in the original translation... But I'm not buying that.
How in the world does this happen?
That single passage totally changes that whole page for me, if you guys can give me some advice it would help me a bunch because I'm freaked out.
Do I need to discard all of what I've read from this esv bible, and start over?? (I chose to read the esv BC it was easier to understand, after trying the king James).
Please answer any of the above questions if you wish, im just super confused now and super disappointed.
No. The majority of translations do not have the word "study" here at Biblehub,
or here at Biblegateway.
The actual problem is that the KJV there does not specifically mean academic study when it says 'study', and the underlying Greek in 2 Tim does not call for a specifically academic context. It simply means to devote oneself or to work at something, not necessarily academically. So Shakespeare can write in a Winter's Tale: "to be more thankful to thee shall be my study, and my profit therein the heaping friendships."
One must always be careful not to read 21st century meanings into 17th century words.
I randomly clicked on a YouTube religion video that sounded interesting, and I skipped forward 20 mins for no apparent reason, and it started talking about how a lot of the new bibles are missing passages, mostly dealing with Jesus Christ. A few of the more modern translations are missing up to 16 passages?!?! What is going on here? I NEVER would have noticed, I'm currently reading ACTS and I totally missed that my esv bible was missing acts 8:37. I thought this bible was great... It was much easier to understand what was going on.
How can it be that a bible misses the most important part of that entire section "37And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."
The odds that I would find that YouTube video, and skip forward to the exact part dealing with the bible and exact chapters of acts that I've been reading the last 3 or 4 days really have my head spinning!!
What else am I missing??
How do I choose the right bible then??
Is this common knowledge among christians? And if it is *** can the reasoning behind it be?? I heard some say BC it probly wasn't in the original translation... But I'm not buying that.
How in the world does this happen?
That single passage totally changes that whole page for me, if you guys can give me some advice it would help me a bunch because I'm freaked out.
Do I need to discard all of what I've read from this esv bible, and start over?? (I chose to read the esv BC it was easier to understand, after trying the king James).
Please answer any of the above questions if you wish, im just super confused now and super disappointed.
Since you want to do the research (too), check out "The Books and The Parchments" by F.F. Bruce. He tells the history of how the Bible came to be.No, I'm not a troll lol, I'm just new to reading the bible. I'm going to do some more research into what else is missing and which bibles are the most accurate. If there are more missing passages dealing specifically with Jesus or other substantial parts I'm definitely going back to the earliest/most accurate version possible. I'll have to get a bunch of input from others more informed than myself and do my own research. Thanks.
Does anyone want to lay bets on how long it will take before I become a not-a-real-person? I'll be happy to hold the money. lol
I know some guys who could. I also knew a transplanted Greek, who says he can almost understand them. I figure it's probably a bit like understanding Old English -- related, but nothing we speak today, except English professors who think it wows the ladies. lolFirst, nobody truly speaks or writes Biblical Greek. For don't you think Paul would correct people today on their Greek? Second, You are going off a dictionary created by James Strong and his friends. They were not inspired by God and they only provide you with a multiple choice choose your own adventure type Bible.
If God did not preserve His Word today, then His Word would have failed.
Does anyone want to lay bets on how long it will take before I become a not-a-real-person? I'll be happy to hold the money. lol
hello, ctc1989, and welcome to CC forums!I randomly clicked on a YouTube religion video that sounded interesting, and I skipped forward 20 mins for no apparent reason, and it started talking about how a lot of the new bibles are missing passages, mostly dealing with Jesus Christ. A few of the more modern translations are missing up to 16 passages?!?! What is going on here? I NEVER would have noticed, I'm currently reading ACTS and I totally missed that my esv bible was missing acts 8:37. I thought this bible was great... It was much easier to understand what was going on.
How can it be that a bible misses the most important part of that entire section "37And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."
The odds that I would find that YouTube video, and skip forward to the exact part dealing with the bible and exact chapters of acts that I've been reading the last 3 or 4 days really have my head spinning!!
What else am I missing??
How do I choose the right bible then??
Is this common knowledge among christians? And if it is *** can the reasoning behind it be?? I heard some say BC it probly wasn't in the original translation... But I'm not buying that.
How in the world does this happen?
That single passage totally changes that whole page for me, if you guys can give me some advice it would help me a bunch because I'm freaked out.
Do I need to discard all of what I've read from this esv bible, and start over?? (I chose to read the esv BC it was easier to understand, after trying the king James).
Please answer any of the above questions if you wish, im just super confused now and super disappointed.
I know some guys who could. I also knew a transplanted Greek, who says he can almost understand them. I figure it's probably a bit like understanding Old English -- related, but nothing we speak today, except English professors who think it wows the ladies. lol
Be careful, Jesus also did that.I mean, he did the same thing when he tempted Jesus. He eliminated from Scripture when he quoted it to the Lord.
Huh, wonder why the devil did that?
Be careful, Jesus also did that.
Really makes little difference, right? A very valid and interesting subject was generated by the question... whatever the original motive.Actually, if it is a real person, it is a HUMAN SPAMMER. Google "forum spammers" to learn how they get users to generate visability for advertisers by getting people to respond to them.
Better yet, Google ctc1989 and see what comes up.
Or you can waste your time answering their questions... and did you notice they haven't been replying to you?That's because they don't need to reply. You guys have generated 4 pages for them already. You've accomplished their mission for them. You're actually doing just what they want, arguing among yourselves as always. CARRY ON!
![]()
No. Biblical Greek is not the same as Greek today. Yes, they are related but they are not the same. The only way you could run into a guy who actually knew Biblical Greek is to run into an apostle who traveled to the future in our time who knew Biblical Greek. It is ignorant to assume people would not be corrected by Paul today. People are relying upon a language that they do not know how to write or speak. The only way you can know what it says is in understanding it in your own language. For did the Holy Spirit speak to people in Hebrew and Greek at pentecost" Or did the Holy Spirit communicate to people in their own languages? Why do you think God cannot communicate to us in our language perfectly today? Why do you think He is powerless today to communicate like He did back then?
It's because people believe in a powerless God who cannot do miracles anymore.