Valiant, since you asked.
Here's an example of where you believe the Bible is wrong, while defending your position that you believe whatever the Bible says is right.
You've conjectured dry land doesn't mean dry land.
Here's an example of where you believe the Bible is wrong, while defending your position that you believe whatever the Bible says is right.
You've conjectured dry land doesn't mean dry land.
and He discomfited the host of the Egyptians clogging their chariot wheels so that they drove heavily, that could not happen if the ground was bone dry.
Here you compare crossing a river to crossing a sea.
The word yam is ambiguous. All it necessarily means is a stretch of water. yâm
yawm
From an unused root meaning to roar; a sea (as breaking in noisy surf) or large body of water; specifically (with the article) the Mediterranean; sometimes a large river, or an artificial basin;
the word 'sea' simply means a large body of water. The geography of the ancients was very vague. The yam suph or Reed Sea need not have been the Red Sea. it means the sea/lake/river of reeds, and could be applied to any sea where there were reeds (of which there are not many in the Red Sea proper). In Moses' day the Red Sea stretched along the border incorporating lakes and swamps. In fact from the description of the journey they crossed at the Bitter Lakes which were formerly part of the Red Sea but much narrower at this point. Read any scholarly commentary,
Here you decided "'walls of water' could mean a hundred different things."
Please stop blaming others as if you alone know God's word,
while proving again and again, you're not all that sure it is God's word.