LAWZ = Law Is this intended to be a joke? Or is it a claim that Moses originally wrote in English?
Many times in various different languages, the spelling of words are very similar.
LAWZ = Law Is this intended to be a joke? Or is it a claim that Moses originally wrote in English?
This map is correct. It placed Mt Sinai in the Pinai Peninsula which in the time of Paul was part of Arabia. It is clear you are not really reading my post but merely glancing over them.
True, but I don't believe because there is no evidence that's THE mountain or that's THE cave. And, yeah, I've seen split rocks before. I used to live on the foothills of the Blue Ridge. Lots of rocks split. Kind of how they end up being sand. And how do you know it's Elijah's cave? Could have been Abraham's cave. (We don't know where that one is either, unless you believe legends that end up pointing back to 2000+ years after the fact.)Doesn't make a difference if you believe or don"t believe. Doesn"t change the many evidences. In other words, it is not just the burned top of the mountain. There is the split rock, Elijah's cave, artifacts, engravings, it matches with Galatians 4:24-26, ect.
And some great sculpturer of the Renaissance (I think Michelangelo, but I'm too lazy to look it up) made a sculpture of Moses with horns. Was that wrong? No, actually. The Ancient Hebrew word for that bright halo around Moses when he came down the mountain is "horn," but it's like "rays of the sun" in English.Never said that the evangelical church said he was actually European or American instead of Jewish. They clearly say he is Jewish but yet.... they promote images of him as being white or European. Therein lies the problem.
Yeah, well, honestly? I worry about what you consider Christian bookstores.
Really? All the ones I have been to have them. I have seen them in several different states.
The second commandment. The don't make graven images of God commandment. We're not supposed to be picturing God at all. (Try that one on for size, as you claim to be sinless. lol) I admit. I do picture God. I won't go out of my way to put more pictures of him in my head. He's not pictureable. He's God. So while you're really cool imagining Jesus as a Middle-Eastern, I know the Bible doesn't describe his looks for that very reason. He is God. Second Commandment. So, are you any better than those who painted him Caucasian?
Don't know what you mean by this? Are you saying it is okay to have white or European images of Jesus?
It's very laughable. You think you're perfect/sinless, just admitted you've seen pictures of God, and still dare to claim I sin, because I've seen the same things you have. LOLMost movies I seen on Jesus are played by parts where the actor is white or European.
It doesn't matter if you Google pictures of Jesus. Doesn't change the reality of Christians today falely creating a wrong image of Him.
God's Laws are pretty serious and they are no laughing matter. We are told not to make an image of anything up in Heaven. Jesus is up in Heaven.
Actually, most of the plagues weren't exactly miraculous, except for the timing of God.I totally agree with you...some have tried to correlate this event with a huge volcanic explosion in the Meditteranean Sea at the same time, sending locusts, pestilences, darkness, diseases, colored water and such downward to the south, hitting EGYPT. This would tend to completely eradicate GOD out of the equation, sadly.
Keep in mind..it is against all physics and scientifically impossible for a fat little Bumble bee to fly, much less houver, yet, nobody has told the Bumble Bee...except GOD.
Well, there is a point when the evidence keeps pointing to something it should give a person the hint that it is true. If you do not care to examine the evidence or consider it, then it does not matter what I say. If you made up your mind and just believe what you want to believe.... then that is what you will always see. But truth is not subject to our personal opinions, though. In other words, don't take my word for it. Watch the video I posted on this within this thread or go to YouTube and do a keyword search on "Exodus Revealed" and then pray about it.True, but I don't believe because there is no evidence that's THE mountain or that's THE cave. And, yeah, I've seen split rocks before. I used to live on the foothills of the Blue Ridge. Lots of rocks split. Kind of how they end up being sand. And how do you know it's Elijah's cave? Could have been Abraham's cave. (We don't know where that one is either, unless you believe legends that end up pointing back to 2000+ years after the fact.)
Yeah, well, honestly? I worry about what you consider Christian bookstores.
(As for geography. Yeah, me too. I've moved around a bit since I've been born again. I also know the difference between a Christian bookstore and a cult's bookstore.)
Well, honestly when a post is overly scholarly, I will naturally glaze over it like a glazed donut because I am not a scholar. I am just your average ordinary friendly neighborhood simple guy. Many of the apostles were simple and average guys.
The second commandment. The don't make graven images of God commandment. We're not supposed to be picturing God at all. (Try that one on for size, as you claim to be sinless. lol)
I admit. I do picture God. I won't go out of my way to put more pictures of him in my head. He's not pictureable. He's God. So while you're really cool imagining Jesus as a Middle-Eastern, I know the Bible doesn't describe his looks for that very reason. He is God. Second Commandment. So, are you any better than those who painted him Caucasian?
It's very laughable. You think you're perfect/sinless, just admitted you've seen pictures of God, and still dare to claim I sin, because I've seen the same things you have. LOL
Stop thinking you are the Bible, and get real.
You're no better.
(You may not be worse either.) I'm not laughing at the Bible.
I'm laughing at you and hoping, some day, you can join in on this joke. We're not perfect. It's okay.
We're still God's kids
and he's still working on us to get us to perfect. That's okay too. Better than okay. That's his plan for his glory!
Jason, this is completely the wrong approach to scripture. Historical evidences do not prove scripture. Scripture proves or disproves man's interpretation of history.Sorry, I didn't mean to be come off sounding rude or short with you. I just prefer clearer explanation on things. In other words, what is your evidence that confirms the Biblical account. Lay it out for me simply. Dumb it down for me. Are these evidences written records? How old and reliable are these documents? Is the evidence an iron clad case?
I am no smarter than you are Jason. It may simply be that I have just spent more time looking into this matter than you. This is not too difficult for you to grasp. Do not hide behind a shield of false incompetence because I know better. I know you are not so academically challenged that you cannot read and comprehend this information. I know you to be quite intelligent.
That is not what I said Jason. You are not reading my posts. What I said was that during the time of the exodus, the Sinai Peninsula was not part of Arabia but later on it became part of Arabia so Paul's statement is absolutely true. In his day the Sinai Peninsula WAS part of Arabia.What makes you think Arabia territory existed in Paul's time but it did not exist in that region prior? Why would Paul call it Arabia in his time and refer to Mt. Sinai? Did Paul get it right or wrong?
[SUP]19 [/SUP]Then the angel of God, who had been traveling in front of Israel’s army, withdrew and went behind them. The pillar of cloud also moved from in front and stood behind them, [SUP]20 [/SUP]coming between the armies of Egypt and Israel. Throughout the night the cloud brought darkness to the one side and light to the other side; so neither went near the other all night long.
[SUP]21 [/SUP]Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea, and all that night the Lord drove the sea back with a strong east wind and turned it into dry land. The waters were divided, [SUP]22 [/SUP]and the Israelites went through the sea on dry ground, with a wall of water on their right and on their left.
wall of water on the right and left...seems pretty deep to have huge walls of water on both sides of you. And that's how God did it, a very strong east wind. He is God, is anything to hard for Him? Why are you people doubting what God allowed to be written in what would become our Bible? Don't you have any faith He is capable of protecting the narrative at all? O ye of little faith!![]()
Actually, most of the plagues weren't exactly miraculous, except for the timing of God.
The blood in the Nile? Probably a red tide of algae. That killed off the fish. What happens when fish are killed off in a river? They don't eat frog eggs. Next came the frogs. The frogs died off, leaving worse decay than usual. (They were bound to die, but as they were growing into tadpoles they were absorbing that deadly red tide, so it was worse.) What happens if you have wall-to-wall dead frogs? Carrion insects. Next came the flies. What do flies do? Splatter everything they touch with germs, bacteria, and viruses. Thus lesions, open scabs, and your basic ingredients for "pestilent."
They used the words they know. We can look back and see cause and effect. Still, why a red tide at that particular moment? How did each plague come right after Moses told the Pharaoh it's coming? And, to this day, we have no scientific explanation for why all the firstborns--humans and animals--died, except for those who put lambs blood on their door post and ate unleavened bread. The answer comes back to "God," but he didn't have to make miracles nonstop to cause it.
good pointand He discomfited the host of the Egyptians clogging their chariot wheels so that they drove heavily, that could not happen if the ground was bone dry.
Don't kid yourself Jason. I am no scholar either. It did not take me that long to dig this information out of scripture and if you will take the time to read it carefully you will see that the Jabel al Laws site simply does not correspond to the rout described in scripture. Back in the 1980's after Ron Wyatt published his findings on these two locations, I too was very impressed with what seemed to be indisputable evidence. Yet, the more I examined the "evidence" and Ron's conclusions, little things began to nag at me that just did not seem to fit. So I determined I was going to settle this matter in my own mind depending on how the evidence agreed or disagreed with the Bible. I was not looking to dispute or discredit Ron's conclusions, in fact, I wanted him to be right. Later, when I began creating a study outline for the book of Exodus for publication, I made the decision to take a more critical look at the proposed claims no matter where the evidence took me. At this point I still believed Ron was correct. I began to recreate the exodus route exclusively from the biblical account. When I completed this I began to see that the sites claimed by Ron could not possibly be correct based on the route given in the Bible. I then began a research into the "evidences" themselves. What I found was that Ron's supposed evidence did not support his claims. He has made a number of unwarranted assumptions based on insufficient evidence and his conclusions are founded on a maze of misrepresentations. The real evidence is in the biblical text, not in the archaeology.
I think it's a reasonable implication...This is absolute nonsense. The text links causation to GOD, not to mud. You are allowing human reason to distort you reading of the text.