Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

Was Abraham saved when he believed the Lord in Genesis 15:6 and his faith was accounted to him for righteousness or not until later, after he obeyed God many years later in Genesis 22? What did Paul say in Romans 4:2-3.
Abraham was SAVED BEFORE Genesis 15.

What about Genesis 12

12The Lord had said to Abram, “Go from your country, your people and your father’s household to the land I will show you.

[SUP]2 [/SUP]“I will make you into a great nation,
and I will bless you;
I will make your name great,
and you will be a blessing.[SUP][a][/SUP]
[SUP]3 [/SUP]I will bless those who bless you,
and whoever curses you I will curse;
and all peoples on earth
will be blessed through you.”[SUP][b][/SUP]


[SUP]4 [/SUP]So Abram went, as the Lord had told him; and Lot went with him. Abram was seventy-five years old when he set out from Harran. [SUP]5 [/SUP]He took his wife Sarai, his nephew Lot, all the possessions they had accumulated and the people they had acquired in Harran, and they set out for the land of Canaan, and they arrived there.

[SUP]6 [/SUP]Abram traveled through the land as far as the site of the great tree of Moreh at Shechem. At that time the Canaanites were in the land. [SUP]7 [/SUP]The Lord appeared to Abram and said, “To your offspring[SUP][c][/SUP] I will give this land.” So he built an altar there to the Lord, who had appeared to him.
[SUP]8 [/SUP]From there he went on toward the hills east of Bethel and pitched his tent, with Bethel on the west and Ai on the east. There he built an altar to the Lord and called on the name of the Lord.
[SUP]9 [/SUP]Then Abram set out and continued toward the Negev.

Genesis 12 COMES BEFORE Genesis 15

Abraham believed and OBEYED God in Genesis 12.

Genesis 15 says this

6Abram believed the Lord, and he credited it to him as righteousness.


You CAN NOT pull Romans 4:2-3 OUT OF THE CONTEXT of chapters 2,3 and 4 and have it make sense. That whole section starts in chapter 2 and that whole section is speaking to the ISRAELITES NOT GENTILES. The gentiles DID NOT HAVE THE LAW.

Romans 2

17Now you, if you call yourself a Jew; if you rely on the law and boast in God;

[SUP]25 [/SUP]Circumcision has value if you observe the law, but if you break the law, you have become as though you had not been circumcised. [SUP]26 [/SUP]So then, if those who are not circumcised keep the law’s requirements, will they not be regarded as though they were circumcised? [SUP]27 [/SUP]The one who is not circumcised physically and yet obeys the law will condemn you who, even though you have the[SUP][c][/SUP] written code and circumcision, are a lawbreaker.


Romans 3

1What advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there in circumcision? [SUP]2 [/SUP]Much in every way! First of all, the Jews have been entrusted with the very words of God.

[SUP]9 [/SUP]What shall we conclude then? Do we have any advantage? Not at all! For we have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under the power of sin

[SUP]19[/SUP]Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God. [SUP]20 [/SUP]Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God’s sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin.


[SUP]21 [/SUP]But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify.[SUP]22 [/SUP]This righteousness is given through faith in[SUP][h][/SUP] Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, [SUP]23 [/SUP]for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, [SUP]24 [/SUP]and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. [SUP]25 [/SUP]God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement,[SUP][i][/SUP] through the shedding of his blood—to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— [SUP]26 [/SUP]he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.

[SUP]27[/SUP]Where, then, is boasting? It is excluded. Because of what law? The law that requires works? No, because of the law that requires faith. [SUP]28 [/SUP]For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from the works of the law. [SUP]29 [/SUP]Or is God the God of Jews only? Is he not the God of Gentiles too? Yes, of Gentiles too, [SUP]30 [/SUP]since there is only one God, who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through that same faith. [SUP]31 [/SUP]Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law.

Romans 4

1What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh, discovered in this matter?

Paul's thoughts throughout that was that the Israelites would NOT BE SAVED by the righteous works of the law.
 
B

BradC

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

Where does scripture ever say that is a salvic issue? I do agree if one does not believe in the virgin birth it can be in an in for Satan to come against their faith.
The virgin birth is a salvic issue according to the scriptures (Isaiah 7:14, Mt 1:21,22) in that Immanuel (God with us) would come, born of a virgin. Salvation came to God's people through a virgin birth fulfilling prophecy. Salvation was provided by God to the people through his only begotten Son. This salvation for the people must be according to the scriptures as prophesied or it would be a counterfeit (such as Tammuz) and the spirit of anti-christ (1 John 4:2,3).
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

The virgin birth is a salvic issue according to the scriptures (Isaiah 7:14, Mt 1:21,22) in that Immanuel (God with us) would come, born of a virgin. Salvation came to God's people through a virgin birth fulfilling prophecy. Salvation was provided by God to the people through his only begotten Son. This salvation for the people must be according to the scriptures as prophesied or it would be a counterfeit (such as Tammuz) and the spirit of anti-christ (1 John 4:2,3).
Would someone who never had the gospels of Matthew or Luke even know about it? Neither Mark nor John even mention it once. Did they do a disservice to the ones they wrote by LEAVING IT OUT? And John is the one that wrote BOTH the Gospel and 1 John but John does NOT mention the virgin birth at all. John does deal with Jesus did come in the flesh.

Where are the verses that state that one MUST believe the virgin to be saved? Where are they and can you show them to me? Nethier one of those say that one MUST believe the virgin birth to be saved.
 
Last edited:

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

All of them don't need to appear together to figure out what is necessary for salvation. Those who hold to the fourfold formula of "Faith + Repentance + Confession + Baptism" suppose that each passage which states what is needed for salvation leaves out certain necessary elements, and that we must pool all such statements together, if we wish to find out what God truly requires for salvation.
You had acknowledged earlier that one of the reasons you discounted the importance of baptism in salvation was the fact that it is not mentioned in all of the conversion examples. Now, after I point out that baptism is mentioned in more examples than another element except belief which is only outnumbers the mention of baptism by one, suddenly the frequency of mention is no longer important. If you still do not believe what Acts 2:38 tells us about the relationship of baptism to the remission of sin then let us look at Acts 22:16. "And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name." Paul was commanded to be baptized and wash away his sins. If baptism is not part of this process then why was Paul commanded to be baptized? If Paul was saved before he was baptized when he believed then why did his sins still need to be washed away? Do you believe that Paul was already saved even before his sins were removed?
 
B

BradC

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

Would someone who never had the gospels of Matthew or Luke even know about it? Neither Mark nor John even mention it once. Did they do a disservice to the ones they wrote by LEAVING IT OUT? And John is the one that wrote BOTH the Gospel and 1 John but John does NOT mention the virgin birth at all. John does deal with Jesus did come in the flesh.

Where are the verses that state that one MUST believe the virgin to be saved? Where are they and can you show them to me? Nethier one of those say that one MUST believe the virgin birth to be saved.
Sarah, the full thought of God concerning the Messiah that was to come and provide salvation contains many aspects, from the depravity of the human heart through the fall to the redemption that is in Christ. In between all that we have the prophets, including Moses, giving us advance notice as to the one who will come to deliver them from sin and iniquity. We have John the Baptist being raised up to raise awareness of the one who would come after him but was preferred before him. We also have the rejection of the ones he came for that was of his own. All these things, including the betrayal of the son of perdition had to take place for salvation to be offered through the cross. Yes, salvation is not in the virgin mother and birth of our Lord Jesus Christ, but without that detail in the plan and will of God taking place the scriptures would not be fulfilled and salvation must come from no other than the one the scriptures testify.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

You had acknowledged earlier that one of the reasons you discounted the importance of baptism in salvation was the fact that it is not mentioned in all of the conversion examples. Now, after I point out that baptism is mentioned in more examples than another element except belief which is only outnumbers the mention of baptism by one, suddenly the frequency of mention is no longer important. If you still do not believe what Acts 2:38 tells us about the relationship of baptism to the remission of sin then let us look at Acts 22:16. "And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name." Paul was commanded to be baptized and wash away his sins. If baptism is not part of this process then why was Paul commanded to be baptized? If Paul was saved before he was baptized when he believed then why did his sins still need to be washed away? Do you believe that Paul was already saved even before his sins were removed?

you have a problem with the fact the bible speaks of a spiritual baptism, and also a water (physical) baptism.

In the areas where baptism is not mentioned, Spiritual baptism takes place. it does not need to be repeated or even mentioned.

why would you want to replace the spiritual. which can save us completely, and make us clean. With t he physical. Which gets us wet, and has no power to cleans sin.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,


you have a problem with the fact the bible speaks of a spiritual baptism, and also a water (physical) baptism.

In the areas where baptism is not mentioned, Spiritual baptism takes place. it does not need to be repeated or even mentioned.

why would you want to replace the spiritual. which can save us completely, and make us clean. With t he physical. Which gets us wet, and has no power to cleans sin.
Do you believe that Paul was commanded in Acts 9 to be baptized in water?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

Do you believe that Paul was commanded in Acts 9 to be baptized in water?

what does that matter, the disciples were commanded to baptize in water also in matt 28. do you think I or anyone else is saying we should NEVER be baptised? (in reality it is one of the first things we should do after salvation)

what matters is what saves us. the act of man, or the act of God.

Anyone who does not allow themselves to be baptized is in sin. But anyone who gets baptized to be saved is not saved. Their faith is in their baptism. not the at of God washing them.

Plus, Paul separated water baptism from the gospel. We already see in the NT people BOASTING of their baptism. (not of works lest any man should boast) which caused paul to worry about saving them with the gospel. and let someone else worry about baptizing them AFTER they were saved.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,


what does that matter, the disciples were commanded to baptize in water also in matt 28. do you think I or anyone else is saying we should NEVER be baptised? (in reality it is one of the first things we should do after salvation)

what matters is what saves us. the act of man, or the act of God.

Anyone who does not allow themselves to be baptized is in sin. But anyone who gets baptized to be saved is not saved. Their faith is in their baptism. not the at of God washing them.

Plus, Paul separated water baptism from the gospel. We already see in the NT people BOASTING of their baptism. (not of works lest any man should boast) which caused paul to worry about saving them with the gospel. and let someone else worry about baptizing them AFTER they were saved.
EG, I would like for you to show me even one passage of scripture that describes water baptism as a work. Also, you are ignoring Paul's own account of his conversion. He clearly places forgiveness of sin after water baptism. Or, do you simply not believe Paul's account?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

EG, I would like for you to show me even one passage of scripture that describes water baptism as a work. Also, you are ignoring Paul's own account of his conversion. He clearly places forgiveness of sin after water baptism. Or, do you simply not believe Paul's account?
I would like you to show me one place in scripture where any kind of physical act is not called a work. and how anyone in the OT was saved by baptism (since they were saved the same way we are)

I actually just showed you.

Not of works lest anyone should boast (the biblical definition of a work) and how paul had problems with people "boasting" of their baptism. ie, it is a work.

Pauls sins were forgiven the moment he placed his faith in Christ. Not after he was water baptized. that is a play on words. water baptism is nothing more than the NT form of circumcision of the OT (albeit a less painful form) and as paul himself says, we are washed (circumcised/baptized) by the hand of God. not by the hands of men. so how could paul teach of a spiritual regnerational baptism, if he believed in a physical regenerational baptism.
 
Jan 27, 2013
4,769
18
0
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

I am asking a grammatical question from the selected text concerning the use of εἰς in this verse that was brought up earlier. Do you have anything to add on this?
why are copyrights, used for words in a bible. and if this copyright is marked 2006, what translation were they using for this single word, before this date. lol so we have the rite to agree or disagree. but what defines correct. would the last point need to be proven or agreed with, so how many need to agree before it becomes fact. yet most of the posts on the forum are using written english. confused so am i lol
Copyright © 2006 by Biblesoft, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Yes, this is correct.(your quote)
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

I would like you to show me one place in scripture where any kind of physical act is not called a work. and how anyone in the OT was saved by baptism (since they were saved the same way we are)

I actually just showed you.

Not of works lest anyone should boast (the biblical definition of a work) and how paul had problems with people "boasting" of their baptism. ie, it is a work.
EG, Baptism is always represented as a passive action taken by the one submitting to the act. How pray tell does this suggest that of baptism is a work of the individual? The ONLY place in scripture where work and baptism are mentioned in the same thought is Col 2:11-13 and here baptism is described as a work of GOD, not the work of the individual. It is this absolute intolerance of water baptism that has brought people to relegate it as some type of work on the part of man in order to marginalize its importance and its biblically appointed place on the salvation process. “In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead. When you were dead in your transgressions and the circumcision of your flesh. He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions.” This is water baptism EG and this is precisely how Paul defines this baptism in Romans 6.

Pauls sins were forgiven the moment he placed his faith in Christ. Not after he was water baptized. that is a play on words. water baptism is nothing more than the NT form of circumcision of the OT (albeit a less painful form) and as paul himself says, we are washed (circumcised/baptized) by the hand of God. not by the hands of men. so how could paul teach of a spiritual regnerational baptism, if he believed in a physical regenerational baptism.
This is not what Paul says in Acts 22. Are you simply going to disregard what Paul had to say about his own conversion?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

EG, Baptism is always represented as a passive action taken by the one submitting to the act. How pray tell does this suggest that of baptism is a work of the individual?
Yet we can say the same thing about circumcision. which most who Got it, were not even old enough to submit to it, yet Paul calls it a work.

The ONLY place in scripture where work and baptism are mentioned in the same thought is Col 2:11-13 and here baptism is described as a work of GOD, not the work of the individual.
Your right, it is the work of God. not an individual. because it is not water baptism paul is describing here, but the spiritual cleansing (circumcision/baptism) performed by God himself. which Paul also mentions in Romans 6. 1 cor 12, Titus 3 among other places.

It is this absolute intolerance of water baptism that has brought people to relegate it as some type of work on the part of man in order to marginalize its importance and its biblically appointed place on the salvation process. “In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead. When you were dead in your transgressions and the circumcision of your flesh. He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions.” This is water baptism EG and this is precisely how Paul defines this baptism in Romans 6.


No, it is not water baptism, You are committing blasphemy my friend, your attributing the work of God to the work of men. It is the work of God in where we are spiritually washed and born again (titus 3:5.
NOT BY WORKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS which we HAVE DONE, by by HIS MERCY, HE SAVED US by the WASHING and renewal OF THE HOLY SPIRIT!

God did not replace the physical act of circumcision with the physical act of water baptism. BOTH physical acts REPRESENT the spiritual act of God which has occurred since the beginning of time, and was fulfilled on the cross. For only GOD an immerse (Baptize) us into th e literal death and burial of Chrit, where our sins are washed away.

Our sins are washed in the blood of Christ (romans 6) NOT WATER!



This is not what Paul says in Acts 22. Are you simply going to disregard what Paul had to say about his own conversion?
You disregard what he says about spiritual baptism. so what is one to do?
 
P

psychomom

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

soo...this is still happening. :rolleyes:

be baptized, for Jesus' sake.

i'm out. :)
 
P

psychomom

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

almost forgot!

Pinwheel-Cookies-1.jpg
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

Yet we can say the same thing about circumcision. which most who Got it, were not even old enough to submit to it, yet Paul calls it a work.



Your right, it is the work of God. not an individual. because it is not water baptism paul is describing here, but the spiritual cleansing (circumcision/baptism) performed by God himself. which Paul also mentions in Romans 6. 1 cor 12, Titus 3 among other places.



No, it is not water baptism, You are committing blasphemy my friend, your attributing the work of God to the work of men. It is the work of God in where we are spiritually washed and born again (titus 3:5.
NOT BY WORKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS which we HAVE DONE, by by HIS MERCY, HE SAVED US by the WASHING and renewal OF THE HOLY SPIRIT!

God did not replace the physical act of circumcision with the physical act of water baptism. BOTH physical acts REPRESENT the spiritual act of God which has occurred since the beginning of time, and was fulfilled on the cross. For only GOD an immerse (Baptize) us into th e literal death and burial of Chrit, where our sins are washed away.

Our sins are washed in the blood of Christ (romans 6) NOT WATER!


You disregard what he says about spiritual baptism. so what is one to do?
You brought up the subject of circumcision so let;s take a look at this for just a moment but I want to first ask you what you think circumcision represented.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

You brought up the subject of circumcision so let;s take a look at this for just a moment but I want to first ask you what you think circumcision represented.

1. I think Paul showed us in the passage.
2. The circumcised were seen to be clean. vs the uncircumcised, which were seen to be filthy


And of course I brought it up. Because in that very passage, Paul said we were circumcised NOT by the hand of men, but BY THE HAND OF GOD.

now lets all think here for a minute, and see how it would sound for God to tell paul to write this, Then in his explanation of HOW God does this spiritual circumcision. it is done by the act of a MAN BAPTIZING you in water.


would not paul be contradicting himself? (not by the hand of man, but um oh wait by the hand of man)

we do not need to go anyplace but that one verse. and we can see what paul is speaking of. and we can confirm that with other passages Like these

ohn 13: 8..jesus said, IF I DO NOT WASH YOU, you have no part with me..

John 13 : 10.. Jesus said to him, He who is washed needs only to wash his feet ( 1 john 1:9) But is COMPLETELY CLEAN, but not all of you ( judas Iscariot)

john 15: 3 You are already clean from the word which I have spoken to you

eph 5: 26 : that He might sanctify and cleanse her (the Church) with the washing of water by the word,

1 Cor 6: 11 - But YOU WERE WASHED, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and BY THE SPIRIT OF OUR GOD

Titus 3 :5. Not by works of rightiosness which we have done, but according to his mercy, he saved us through the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Spirit

they all fit together, with this one verse.


col 2: 11 - 12 In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body 8of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in THE WORKING OF GOD, who raised Him from the dead.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,


1. I think Paul showed us in the passage.
2. The circumcised were seen to be clean. vs the uncircumcised, which were seen to be filthy


And of course I brought it up. Because in that very passage, Paul said we were circumcised NOT by the hand of men, but BY THE HAND OF GOD.

now lets all think here for a minute, and see how it would sound for God to tell paul to write this, Then in his explanation of HOW God does this spiritual circumcision. it is done by the act of a MAN BAPTIZING you in water.


would not paul be contradicting himself? (not by the hand of man, but um oh wait by the hand of man)

we do not need to go anyplace but that one verse. and we can see what paul is speaking of. and we can confirm that with other passages Like these

ohn 13: 8..jesus said, IF I DO NOT WASH YOU, you have no part with me..

John 13 : 10.. Jesus said to him, He who is washed needs only to wash his feet ( 1 john 1:9) But is COMPLETELY CLEAN, but not all of you ( judas Iscariot)

john 15: 3 You are already clean from the word which I have spoken to you

eph 5: 26 : that He might sanctify and cleanse her (the Church) with the washing of water by the word,

1 Cor 6: 11 - But YOU WERE WASHED, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and BY THE SPIRIT OF OUR GOD

Titus 3 :5. Not by works of rightiosness which we have done, but according to his mercy, he saved us through the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Spirit

they all fit together, with this one verse.


col 2: 11 - 12 In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body 8of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in THE WORKING OF GOD, who raised Him from the dead.
Paul tells us in Col 2 that the removal of sins was accomplished by Christ and this could not be more true but he also tells us that this took place in the act of baptism in which we were raised from the dead. It is here that he says God made us alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses. The removal of sin in baptism is the act of God not is the symbols themselves. You insist this has to be Holy Spirit baptism but this is simply not what Paul said. It is water baptism that is the representation of the death burial and resurrection of Jesus. There is no passage of scripture anywhere that connects Holy Spirit baptism with the removal of sin. Here is a simple question EG. When Paul told the Ephesian Church that there is only one baptism, to which baptism was he referring?



 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

Paul tells us in Col 2 that the removal of sins was accomplished by Christ and this could not be more true but he also tells us that this took place in the act of baptism in which we were raised from the dead. It is here that he says God made us alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses. The removal of sin in baptism is the act of God not is the symbols themselves. You insist this has to be Holy Spirit baptism but this is simply not what Paul said. It is water baptism that is the representation of the death burial and resurrection of Jesus. There is no passage of scripture anywhere that connects Holy Spirit baptism with the removal of sin. Here is a simple question EG. When Paul told the Ephesian Church that there is only one baptism, to which baptism was he referring?
God only baptizes with the Holy Spirit and that is the one baptism that quickens souls dead in trespass and sin. Water pertains to the body and not the Spirit.

To baptize is to bring under or to place under. If you are brought under or place under the water you most certainly die. Literally and physically you die under the water. It is the Holy Spirit which gives life and life eternal not water.

All the elements of the earth are contaminated with sin. Nothing that is contaminated by sin can cleanse from sin. The blood of Christ is without sin and makes atonement for sin. The Holy Spirit is from God and is without sin so the Holy Spirit baptizes us unto eternal life. Water baptism can only symbolize obedience to Gods word but like the bread and the cup it is cannot rise above the level of symbolism. Foot washing Christ said you are already clean but you need your feet washed to be clean. John 13:10 Symbols but not means of salvation.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,

God only baptizes with the Holy Spirit and that is the one baptism that quickens souls dead in trespass and sin. Water pertains to the body and not the Spirit.

To baptize is to bring under or to place under. If you are brought under or place under the water you most certainly die. Literally and physically you die under the water. It is the Holy Spirit which gives life and life eternal not water.

All the elements of the earth are contaminated with sin. Nothing that is contaminated by sin can cleanse from sin. The blood of Christ is without sin and makes atonement for sin. The Holy Spirit is from God and is without sin so the Holy Spirit baptizes us unto eternal life. Water baptism can only symbolize obedience to Gods word but like the bread and the cup it is cannot rise above the level of symbolism. Foot washing Christ said you are already clean but you need your feet washed to be clean. John 13:10 Symbols but not means of salvation.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
If the one baptism of Ephesians 4 is Holy Spirit then why did the apostles continue to practice water baptism?