Baptismal Regeneration of Infants

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Baptismal Regeneration of infants

  • Yes it is valid

    Votes: 9 29.0%
  • No it is not valid

    Votes: 22 71.0%

  • Total voters
    31
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
Mark 1:4*NIV

4*And so John came, baptizing in the desert region and preaching a*baptism of repentance*for the forgiveness of sins.

Luke 3:3*NIV

3*He went into all the country around the Jordan, preaching a*baptism of repentance*for the forgiveness of sins.

Acts 13:24*NIV

24*Before the coming of Jesus, John preached repentance and baptism to all the people of Israel.

Acts 19:4*NIV

4*Paul said, "John's baptism was a baptism of repentance. He told the people to believe in the one coming after him, that is, in Jesus."

Those who call themselves Father....didn't Jesus say this:

Matthew 23:9*"And do not call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven"

Hmmmm, how many do what Jesus said in this verse?
Already went over this. Your choice to ignore the scriptures i posted. Paul even said call me your father in Christ, another scripture you all seem to look past in search of your own way
 
S

sltaylor

Guest
Already went over this. Your choice to ignore the scriptures i posted. Paul even said call me your father in Christ, another scripture you all seem to look past in search of your own way
Ok, and Paul said to call him Father or brother? "You BROTHERS, like Isaac"

I'm going to just stick with what Jesus said: "Don't call anyone else on earth Father".

Can I just listen to Jesus and not lean on your understanding. ..
And Paul did NOT say call me father....he was referencing himself being IN CHRIST,
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
Sltaylor - what constitutes recognition of sin? What gravity of sin must be understood? As a preteen, I may have a knowledge of right and wrong and confess of my wrong, but I may not have experienced how complicated right and wrong decisions can be - I may not really know the weight of sin, and what I am burying symbolicly.

The problems I have with age of accountability is one) you are not drawing it directly from a Scripture, but reasoning a Scripture (repentance). So imo, there's no justification in being dogmatic about it. I mean that from the OTHER end of the argument as well.

And two) if you're saying a young child, like 12 years old, can repent... even though that child has experienced imperfection and flaws in oneself, is still in some cases largely removed from the weight of sin, being sheltered by the parents. Far removed from the weight of complicated decisions were sacrifices must be made, and mercy dealt, in order to obey God.

It's almost like they have never FELT the effects of sin, given a healthy home and body/mind. Repentance then kinda carries then a sort of redumentairly, no need to do that anymore feeling. Also, in pairing it with Baptizing you give the impression it only needs to happen once (and some teach that.) To me, it doesn't carry the full weight in the heart, because the sin has not pulled the child through a hard time yet.

That could be seen as an argument for decision, sure. But my point of that argument is that "being of age" to decide is a little trickier, cause what you could be doing in letting them get Baptized is minizing it's significance, in buring the Old Adam... They haven't yet really dealt with the Old Adam, not in the way to really grasp evil. It's a very impoortant, or I'd think, ordiance - they should be truly conscious of what it stands for. There's a reason children are considered and look at as pure innocent by many people - they don't know evil like older folks, blissfilly ignorant. Again I mean children from healthy homes.
 
Last edited:
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
Ok, and Paul said to call him Father or brother? "You BROTHERS, like Isaac"

I'm going to just stick with what Jesus said: "Don't call anyone else on earth Father".

Can I just listen to Jesus and not lean on your understanding. ..
And Paul did NOT say call me father....he was referencing himself being IN CHRIST,
1 Cor 4:15, a father in Christ ie. a priest. Its God's Word, are you going to dispute it? Come on, give me your "yeah but..........."
 
Last edited:
S

sltaylor

Guest
Sltaylor - what constitutes recognition of sin? What gravity of sin must be understood? As a preteen, I may have a knowledge of right and wrong and confess of my wrong, but I may not have experienced how complicated right and wrong decisions can be - I may not really know the weight of sin, and what I am burying symbolicly.

The problems I have with age of accountability is one) you are not drawing it directly from a Scripture, but reasoning a Scripture (repentance). So imo, there's no justification in being dogmatic about it. I mean that from the OTHER end of the argument as well.

And two) if you're saying a young child, like 12 years old, can repent... even though that child has experienced imperfection and flaws in oneself, is still in some cases largely removed from the weight of sin, being sheltered by the parents. Far removed from the weight of complicated decisions were sacrifices must be made, and mercy dealt, in order to obey God.

It's almost like they have never FELT the effects of sin, given a healthy home and body/mind. Repentance then kinda carries then a sort of redumentairly, no need to do that anymore feeling. Also, in pairing it with Baptizing you give the impression it only needs to happen once (and some teach that.) To me, it doesn't carry the full weight in the heart, because the sin has not pulled the child through a hard time yet.

That could be seen as an argument for decision, sure. But my point of that argument is that "being of age" to decide is a little trickier, cause what you could be doing in letting them get Baptized is minizieng it's significance, in buring the Old Adam... They haven't yet really dealt with the Old Adam, not in the way to really grasp evil. There's a reason children are considered and look at as pure innocent by many people - they don't know evil like older folks, blissfilly ignorant. Again I mean children from healthy homes.
1 Corinthians 13:11*NIV

11*When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me.

So you see there is a difference in the reasoning of a child and acknowledgement of sin.

"But in order that sin might be recognized as sin, it produced death in me*through what was good,"

Dying to sin is the ultimate understanding in the difference between what is right and wrong...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
1 Corinthians 13:11*NIV

11*When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me.

So you see there is a difference in the reasoning of a child and acknowledgement of sin.
You are still missing the point of baptism
 

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
1 Corinthians 13:11*NIV

11*When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me.

So you see there is a difference in the reasoning of a child and acknowledgement of sin.
That passage deals with growing in love. Has nothing to do with sin.

But I'm not sure where or how you're drawing the distinction.
 
S

sltaylor

Guest
That passage deals with growing in love. Has nothing to do with sin.
Omgosh, really? The point of baptism was for the repentance of one's sin....seriously.
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
Omgosh, really? The point of baptism was for the repentance of one's sin....seriously.
No! This is where you are wrong! The point of baptism is for the remission of Adam's sin
 
S

sltaylor

Guest
No! This is where you are wrong! The point of baptism is for the remission of Adam's sin
Ok.
Luke 3:3*NIV

3*He went into all the country around the Jordan, preaching a*baptism of repentance*for the forgiveness of sins.

Because clearly John said repent of adams sin and not your own, right?

John 1:23*NIV

23*John replied in the words of Isaiah the prophet, "I am the*voice of one calling*in the desert, 'Make straight the way for the Lord.' "
 
Last edited by a moderator:
S

sltaylor

Guest
You are still missing the point of baptism
The point of Baptism:
"But in order that sin might be recognized as sin, it produced death in me*through what was good,"
 
S

sltaylor

Guest
Yes what John said was repent all of you and be saved, not all of you repent because of Adam. No it was for what each man had done individually.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
Yes what John said was repent all of you and be saved, not all of you repent because of Adam. No it was for what each man had done individually.
Mat 3:6 And were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins.

True
 
S

sltaylor

Guest
1 Cor 4:15, a father in Christ ie. a priest. Its God's Word, are you going to dispute it? Come on, give me your "yeah but..........."
So because Paul said that through the gospel he became a father in Christ, you are going to deny Jesus said don't call anyone on earth Father?? I think you are missing what Paul is saying
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
So because Paul said that through the gospel he became a father in Christ, you are going to deny Jesus said don't call anyone on earth Father?? I think you are missing what Paul is saying
So, you are denying the bible? interesting
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
Yeah, someone can be a teacher without being adressed as teacher, just as someone can be a master without being called master. The same as there can be fathers who father others through the gospel but are not to be called fathers.
 
S

sltaylor

Guest
Here is research into the greek word Father according to scripture, see if you can find which Paul is referencing, they are all the same word, but implied different meanings...
*patḗr*–*father; one who*impartslife and is*committed*to it; a progenitor, bringing into being to pass on*the potential for likeness.

3962*/patḗr*("father") is used of our heavenly*Father. He imparts life, from physical birth to the gift of eternal life through the*second*birth (regeneration, being born again). Through ongoing sanctification, the believer more and more*resembles*their heavenly Father – i.e. each time they receive faith from Him and obey it, which results in their unique glorification.

[3962*/patḗr*("father") refers to a begetter, originator, progenitor – one in "intimate connection and relationship" (Gesenius). Just as in the NT, the OT never speaks of universal fatherhood of God toward men (see. G. B. Steven's concession,*The Theology of the New Testament, p 70; see p 68) (TWOT*1, 6).

For more o
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
Yeah, someone can be a teacher without being adressed as teacher, just as someone can be a master without being called master. The same as there can be fathers who father others through the gospel but are not to be called fathers.
And your scripture for this? I know you all love your scripture. Can you back up that what Paul said was not the Word of God? It is scripture after all
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
Here is research into the greek word Father according to scripture, see if you can find which Paul is referencing, they are all the same word, but implied different meanings...
*patḗr*–*father; one who*impartslife and is*committed*to it; a progenitor, bringing into being to pass on*the potential for likeness.

3962*/patḗr*("father") is used of our heavenly*Father. He imparts life, from physical birth to the gift of eternal life through the*second*birth (regeneration, being born again). Through ongoing sanctification, the believer more and more*resembles*their heavenly Father – i.e. each time they receive faith from Him and obey it, which results in their unique glorification.

[3962*/patḗr*("father") refers to a begetter, originator, progenitor – one in "intimate connection and relationship" (Gesenius). Just as in the NT, the OT never speaks of universal fatherhood of God toward men (see. G. B. Steven's concession,*The Theology of the New Testament, p 70; see p 68) (TWOT*1, 6).

For more o
You have some weird numbers here! Scripture please