Which laws are and are not valid?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Many are caught up with cultist dogma of mankind, not hearing the plain words of our Salvation on this subject. Even with the words right in front of them, they do not see. How many times, you know, I have copied and pasted Christs's words, as have you, and many come back with dead eyes not having understood a thing. The grammar utilized in this teaching does not allow for error, yet, many are in erro. God have mercy. God bless all in Jesus Christ., amen.
It's so nice to see God fearing people such as yourself abide by this exhortation.

"Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints." Jude 1:3
Thanks. . .for the pious compliment.
I didn't give it to you.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Baloney. . .nothing is impossible with God.

First of all, the first covenant is the Abrahamic covenant, which is fulfilled in the new covenant.

The Mosaic (old) covenant was a temporary addition (Gal 3:19) to the Abrahamic covenant of
Promise (Christ), given to reveal sin and its penalty, as well as the holiness of God.

God gave the Mosaic covenant to reveal sin and its penalty, not to give eternal life.


If he gave it for eternal life, then he made a false offer, because it is impossible for man to
obtain eternal life through the righteousness of law keeping (Gal 3:10), and that for two reasons:
righteousness is only by faith (Ge 15:6), and
it is impossible for man to keep the law perfectly (Gal 3:10).

Yes, long life was one of the physical blessings of obedience.

Nope. . .the Greek word is kainos (new), meaning newly made, of different nature,

the Greek word is not neos (new), meaning reproduction of the old in quality and character,

nor is it anakainoo (renewed).

The new covenant is the fulfillment of the first covenant, the Abrahamic Covenant of Promise (Christ).

Do you ever stop mish-mashing God's word written?


The law written on our hearts is the new covenant (Lk 22:20) law of Christ (Mt 22:37-40), which fulfills everything.

The definition of "old" (gerasko) is given in the verse--"to decay and wax old."

It has been done (past tense).

Nope. . .Heb 8:13 teaches that the Mosaic (Old) Covenant is obsolete, having been made so when
God changed the priesthood on which the law was based (Heb 7:11),
because the covenant was based on the law,
which law was based on the priesthood (Heb 7:11),
which priesthood was changed (Heb 7:12),
setting aside the Levitical priesthood, and establishing a new eternal priesthood (Heb 7:17, 21).


According to the NT word of God, we are simply called to obey the law of Christ (Mt 22:37-40).
Answer this. Why would God have engineered something by His everlasting word just to make Himself out to be a liar by changing something that He said was everlasting?
Can you not understand that the priesthood only has been changed?
Do you not understand the law was based on the priesthood, and that
with no Levitical priesthood there can be no law (Heb 7:18-19)?

Do you not understand that with no law, there can be no Mosaic covenant (Heb 8:13)?

Do you not understand these were temporary until the time of the new order (Heb 9:10),
that the old wine has been replaced with the new wine of the new order, which cannot be
contained in the old wineskins of the old order?
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Nope. . .the Greek word is kainos (new), meaning newly made, of different nature,

the Greek word is not neos (new), meaning reproduction of the old in quality and character,

nor is it anakainoo (renewed).

The definition of "old" (gerasko) is given in the verse--"to decay and wax old."

The new covenant is the fulfillment of the first covenant, the Abrahamic Covenant of Promise (Christ).

The new covenant (Lk 22:20) is not a "renewal" of the old covenant.

Do you ever stop mish-mashing God's word written?
What Y'shua is reported to have said is crystal clear.
Agreed. . .the New Covenant (Lk 22:20) is new, it is not a "renewed" old covenant, which is obsolete (Heb 8:13).
 
Last edited:
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Do you not understand the law was based on the priesthood, and that
with no Levitical priesthood there can be no law (Heb 7:18-19)?
Exodus chapters 20 through 23 have nothing to do with the priesthood of Aaron.
Do you not understand that with no law, there can be no Mosaic covenant (Heb 8:13)?
The covenant with Israel didn't negate God's word to Israel because the flesh was weak. Your focus on God's word is clearly comparing it with the canal mind. God is not a fault. He never was.

You present half truth which is no truth. The adversary does that. I would hope that you understand this.
It would do you well to understand that the words of God are not made void because of Israel's non adherence to the instructions. God's instructions are for His Children then and now.

Do you not understand these were temporary until the time of the new order (Heb 9:10),
that the old wine has been replaced with the new wine of the new order, which cannot be
contained in the old wineskins of the old order?
It isn't the contents (wine) that has been replaced, it's the container that held the wine that has been replaced by the new container of the wine both old and new which are the words of God. The adversary desires us to visualize God's divinity in generalities. One doesn't throw away the wine just because there is a new batch made that has a sweeter ingredient.

"And ye shall eat old store, and bring forth the old because of the new." Leviticus 26:10

"Then said he unto them, Therefore every scribe which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which bringeth forth out of his treasure things new and old." Matthew 13:52
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
I suspect not many are surprised that
you think the NT word of God is cultist dogma because it gives the lie to your cultist dogma.

Not to mention: assertion without demonstration is without merit.

Are you neglecting the fact that the NT word of God reveals that in Christ there is no Jew nor Greek
(Gal 3:28)? . . .I think you are.

So. . .who we gonna' believe. . .the words spoken by the Son in these last days (Heb 1:1-2)
through the NT writers. . .or your "cultist dogma"?

I'll raise you one better. . .it is that every time you present half-backed NT doctrine in the name of Jesus Christ, it is addressed with the complete revelation of the words spoken by the Son in these last days (Heb 1:1-2) through the NT writers.

Physician, heal thyself.

The believing people of God have always been the body of Christ.
That is revealed in the NT word of God.

And we have true knowledge of God only through all the words spoken by that blessed Lamb, the Son,
in these last days (Heb 1:1-2) through the NT writers.

And there we have your cultist dogma--you know more than Paul . . .based on nothing but the speculation of your unbelief in all of God's NT word written.

You have no Biblical basis for such nonsense.


Almost. . .but not complete, as usual. . .let me fix it for you.
God teaches each member of the Body of Jesus by his own Holy Spirit through the NT word of God written. . .all of it.

And he always uses the NT-word-of-God-without-contradiction to teach by the Holy Spirit.
The reason that this world is in such a chaotic mess is that many professing Christians have been sucked into the false doctrine that you are propagating.
Assertion without demonstration is without merit.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Nopey. I regret that this is the word of Elin !


What Y'shua is reported to have said is crystal clear.

" whoever sets aside one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom from heaven"

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil."


" For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled
."



All the rest, however well-intended, is twisting things to suit what we would like Him to have said.
It is truly amazing to me that a person such as yourself that claims not to be a Christian, knows (in this case) the Bible better than those that profess Christianity. You're no sad, but the situation sure is. I hope that someday you will accept what has been revealed to you as truth. You know the truth as it seems, it's just a matter of taking it to heart.
Wow!

That explains a lot. . .
Again such as another post you addressed. This post you quote is not to you. But if it "explains a lot" please go into detail why a non Christian, as he is, don't want to believe the way they visualize Christians as he made clear several days ago. Could it be because he has seen to much distortion of the truth?
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

There is nothing in that scripture that says Jesus negated anything His father endorsed form the beginning.
Agreed. . .the word of God does not contradict itself.

Those who see it as contradictory reveal their lack of understanding of it.

What you are propagating is that you want everyone to accept that.................
because the priesthood is changed, there is made of necessity to change the entire law to make it void for all believers because of the change.
I didn't write Heb 7:11-12.

It's really quite simple. . .the law was based on the priesthood (Heb 7:11-12). . .
no priesthood means no law.

That's why the Mosaic covenant is obsolete (Heb 8:13),
because it was based on the law,
which was based on the priesthood
which was changed.

No priesthood = no law = no Mosaic covenant.

The law given to the people (Heb 7:11) has been set aside (Heb 7:18-19),
and the Mosaic covenant made obsolete (Heb 8:13).

Hey, I didn't author the NT word of God. . .take it up with him.

Don't blame your ignorance on me.
 
Last edited:
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Assertion without demonstration is without merit.
Are you talking about the God of the Old Covenant?

Assertion is a confident and forceful statement of fact or belief.
Demonstration is the act or circumstance of proving or being proved conclusively, as by reasoning or a show of evidence:
Merit means to deserve or be worthy.

So the fact presented about the word of God as everlasting are assertions that show no evidence of demonstration meaning that God is unworthy because His word in the old covenant is without merit? How sad!!
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
If they are the same why try to teach a difference? The words of God's law are defined in the Old Covenant.
The contents are still good the container is obsolete.
Nope. . .the wine is new (Mt 22:37-40).
 
O

oldthennew

Guest
PSALM 119:126.
It is time for thee, LORD, to work: for they have made void Thy law.

is this scripture profitable for instruction?

as it is written,
'All Thy Commandments are Righteousness.'
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
ACTS 17:11.
These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind,
and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

which scriptures were they searching
?
The Scriptures they had. . .which testified of the coming Messiah.

That's how they knew Jesus was he.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Do you have any idea of what Jesus actuality fulfilled.
Does that word fulfilled mean to make void or to negate in your opinion?
"Fulfilled" means to accomplish, complete, finish.

All of which Jesus did regarding the law.

To me "fulfilled" means to complete, not to throw it away.
"Fulfill" means to finish.

When I have "fulfilled" the terms of the contract, it is no longer operative, the contract is "finished."
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
11TIMOTHY 3:16.

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

which scripture is Timothy speaking of and which scripture is excluded?
First of all, Timothy didn't say it.

Secondly, we see that the NT writings were regarded as Scripture, when

Peter groups Paul's writings with "the other Scriptures" (2Pe 3:16) and
Paul refers to Luke' writing (Lk 10:7) as Scripture (1Tim 5:18).

Thirdly, none of the word of God in either testament is excluded,
nor does any of it contradict itself, because God does not contradict himself.
It is all in perfect harmony as stated and correctly understood.

Any supposed contradictions reveal one's misunderstanding of it.
 
U

UnderHiswings

Guest
:D I had this same question. It started about middle last year. Well, just to give some background, my newly wed husband is a youth pastor, so I am surrounded and bombarded with many doctrines in the church surroundings. I was truly called by God at 16 to go into full-time ministry. I was never in a specific church, but involved in several ministries until I got married. Well, things started to get blurry in the church surroundings, sometimes religion can be so powerful that it completely counterfeits and overrides true relationship... it completely killed me to the point where I wanted to leave Christianity altogether, though my love for Christ kept me going in this chaos, and thats where my struggle started. Who's right, those into Hebrew roots (the ones believing in the law and the feasts etc.) or those fully believing in grace or those who believe in righteous living and repentance... Well, I was sort of involved in all since I have built relationships with people in church with either one of these as their fundamental teaching. I tried to make sense of everything, but God to me to the point where I hated everything about religion, meaning those prescribed ways of relationship with Him, like how you should or shouldn't worship to 'look' holy, how many times and how long I should pray a day, how many chapters must I read daily to be fresh in scripture knowledge and afterall experience the 'anointing'. Well this all faded drastically in one encounter with Him. He showed me that people kill relationship through rules and regulations, THATS why Jesus came, so that we don't have to worry about that anymore but can focus merely on loving Him and being in relationship with Him. No I am not talking about, having knowledge about him and then believing, that falls a little short of what He had in mind. He wants your heart, ALL of it ultimately. I got to know Him in ways I cannot even describe, I totally feel fulfilled for the first time in my life, and FREE, just like He said, if the SON sets you free you are free indeed. THATS sooo true. I love Him more than ever, but I terminated ALL my taught knowledge and just went to Him empty minded, so that I do not have preconceived thoughts about Him. Those stuff blocks your spirit from truly knowing Him. And religion is the worst. He made you unique!! Be unique for Him, He loves that about you!! He made you the way you are because He wanter you that way... He enjoys your uniqueness and personality. So don't follow the flow, just give Him who you are, and trust the fact that thats enough for Him, because He simply just loves you for WHO YOU ARE. :)
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Exodus chapters 20 through 23 have nothing to do with the priesthood of Aaron.
Agreed. . .that would be Heb 7:11.

The covenant with Israel didn't negate God's word to Israel because the flesh was weak.
Agreed. . .the Mosaic Covenant is made obsolete because the word of God says that it is (Heb 8:13).

God is not a fault. He never was.
Agreed. . .

You present half truth which is no truth. The adversary does that. I would hope that you understand this.
It would do you well to understand that the words of God are not made void because of Israel's non adherence to the instructions.
Agreed. . .
Your issue of unbelief is with Heb 8:13, not with me.

That's above my pay grade.

Like the wine at the wedding feast in Cana, the new and better new covenant wine was served after the older old covenant wine.
 
Last edited:
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
Agreed. . .the word of God does not contradict itself.

Those who see it as contradictory reveal their lack of understanding of it.
Then why do you endorse that it does, or that some of God's word is extinct because of a new covenant?

I didn't write Heb 7:11-12.

It's really quite simple. . .the law was based on the priesthood (Heb 7:11-12). . .
no priesthood means no law.
How in the world to you come to that conclusion? The priesthood, whether in Christ of the New Covenant, or the Levities of the Old Covenant was endorsed by God. The law wasn't endorsed by the priesthood. That's like saying the Priesthood have power over the Almighty God.
That's why the Mosaic covenant is obsolete (Heb 8:13),
because it was based on the law,
which was based on the priesthood
which was changed.

No priesthood = no law = no Mosaic covenant.
The contents of the covenant is the word of God. The law came from God, not the priesthood of Aaron or the Levite named Moses. You're trying to explain that when the Aaronic priesthood vanished (because the law was instigated by Aaron) that it all went away, and God is excluded. Come on!

The law given to the people (Heb 7:11) has been set aside (Heb 7:18-19),
and the Mosaic covenant made obsolete (Heb 8:13).

Hey, I didn't author the NT word of God. . .take it up with him.

Don't blame your ignorance on me.
As we have discussed before, Hebrews 8:13 is the old man, with the physical priesthood by comparison. Stop endorsing that God's word of the Old Covenant is vanishing away when it is clear that Jesus came to change us, and the believers old carnal nature is in the process of vanishing away. The Aaronic priesthood represents the carnal, the Messiah priesthood is the spiritual in Jesus our Savior. That doesn't negate the law of the Old Covenant. Don't throw away God's word that it contains, just get rid of the container.

Do you actually want these laws to be abolished? Did Jesus Himself do away with these? Good grief gal! Think about what you are trying to teach.

"Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord." Leviticus 19:18

Read the previous 17 verses and learn how to do this. It has nothing to do with the Aaronic priesthood.

"And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." Deuteronomy 6:5

Read and understand the previous 4 verses, and it will instruct you where to find the details on how to do that. This is what hangs on the law of love. There can be nothing hanging on this if has vanished away.

"On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." Matthew 22:40
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Again such as another post you addressed. This post you quote is not to you. But if it "explains a Itlot" please go into detail
It explains a lot about his misunderstanding of the NT which I previously addressed.