That is because I was referring to one kind of confession above and another in this one.
The first kind of confession I said was not necessary for salvation was of their confession of sins and that they repent of them.
The kind of confession that I said was necessary for salvation is the kind that lines up with your faith in the work of Christ on the cross.
There is a public confession the sinner must make (Mt 10:32,33; ;Rom 10:9,10) before he can be saved and that is a profession that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, professing the facts of the gospel and must hold on to that profession.
There is also a confession of sins (1 Jn 1:9) that can be made by those who are already Christians that have been baptized.
know1 said:
It depends on to whom you are talking about. Whether they be born again or not.
If the repentance of one born is confessed, God says they will be cleansed.
1Jn 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
But for the unbelieving soul, their repentance it to first go from doubt to believing in Christ, and from not needing a savior to go to heaven, to knowing that one is needed and that Christ is that savior.
Nowhere does the bible say repentance remits the sins of one that is lost and unforgiven. Peter told his lost, unforgiven listeners to "repent and be baptized for remission of sins". Baptism is for the purpose of remission of sins not repentance.
1 Jn 1:9 John is writing to Christians, so that verse applies to Christians but not to those that are unforgiven and lost.
know1 said:
Baptism, as far as I know, is symbolic of what took place in the spirit world, but not necessary for salvation.
What you are trying to tell me is that what Paul wrote in Romans 10 is not complete, or that it's a partial truth, when he said, if I do such and such, I SHALL BE SAVED. If that is not the whole truth for one to receive salvation, then he and God lied when they said that we shall be saved.
If I have met the conditions listed, then God is obligated to do what He said He will do.
If He didn't, then He would be a liar and a hypocrite, because He told us to do what we vowed. Therefore, God has to do what He said.
And sense God is neither a liar nor a hypocrite, I can take Him at His word, and He will do just what He said, without all the other things you listed.
Mk 16:16; Jn 3:5; Mk 16:16; Acts 2:38; Rom 6:3-7; 1 Cor 1:12,13; 1 Cor 12:13; Gal 3:27; 1 Pet 3:21 etc all show that baptism saves.
In the context of Romans chapters 9-11, Paul is writing to Jews and proving to the Jews that they cannot rely upon their nationality/physical birth saving them...just being an Israelite born of Abraham does not save but obedience to God saves. So going into detail on every single aspect of what makes up obedience is not Paul's point but Paul is contrasting physical birth that does not save to obedience that does save.
Acts 26:20 "
But shewed first unto them of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judaea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance."
Above is a verse where Paul said he taught repentance to all, Jew and Gentile. The fact Paul did not mention repentance in Rom 10:9,10 constitute a contradiction in Paul's teaching?
No, because:
1) Paul was contrasting the physical birth to obedience to the Jews in Rom 10 and did not go into all the details of obedience.
2) one must examine "
all the counsel of God" (Acts 20:27) when studying a subject as salvation. Very rarely does one or two verses tell us all there is to know about a topic, one must examine all verses that deal with that topic and Rom 10:9,10 does not tell all there is to know about salvation for there are many, many verses that deal with salvation that must be considered.
Too often some here on this forum will pull the phrases "
not of works" (Eph 2:9) and "
worketh not" Rom 4:5
completely out of thier contexts, then they want to isolate those two phrases from all other bible verses then wrongly declare salvation is not of works. When those verses are
left in context with other bible passages one can see the "not of work" have to do with works of the OT law and trying to work to merit salvation and are
not about obedience to God. Likewise one cannot pull Rom 10:9,10 out of context and isolate it from all other verses that deal with salvation.
Rom 8:24 "
For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?"
What someone pulled Rom 8:24 out of it's context and isolated it from all other bible verses (as it is done with Eph 2:9; Rom 4:5) and that someone declares all one needs to be saved is "hope only", no need for belief in Christ, no need for repenting of sins, no need for confessing Christ, no need to be baptized for remission of sins all one has to do to be saved is HOPE ONLY? There would be those here saying "that is not right, that cannot be done" yet it
is the very, exact thing they do with Eph 2:9; Rom 4:5. The verse does not say saved by "hope alone" just as no other verse says one is saved by "faith alone". Again, the only way one can get the bible teach salvation is by "hope alone' or by "faith alone" is by pulling verse(s) out of context, then isolating those verses from all other bible passages.