but the response to the original post is that there is a balance. What the original premise, with clarification by the original poster, is that the definition as defined is not taboo, but also not biblical as described. Our original poster seems to, by her own posts, indicate she has a DOM/sub relationship with her husband and views him on par with God... Views him on the same level as God in her life. This part is not biblical. This part is the bit that is troubling.
also, the answer is in the balance, not that SHE submit fully to her husband solely, but that he regards her the same way Christ regards the church and gives himself up for her.