jesus saves corrupt sinners.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
A couple of points to ponder my friend....

1. Judas committed suicide after he had seen he betrayed innocent blood and could not be listed in the 12 that seen Jesus after the resurrection
2. The choosing of an Apostle by lot happened after chapter one in Acts when Jesus ascended....Cephas being Peter and the 12 which equals 13.....

So...seeing Judas was dead who was number 12 and 13? Just a point to ponder......Was it Matthias and Paul? Could Paul as a Pharisee seen him after his resurrection? He did by Revelation, but not until after the ascension....that we know of....
Probably Mattias. Paul a few veres later says 'and last of all seen of ME as one born out of due time'.
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
Probably Mattias. Paul a few veres later says 'and last of all seen of ME as one born out of due time'.
I've always wondered about drawing lots and Matthias, just an opinion, but this a rather strange way to fix the authority of the Lord upon somebody, as also evidence by what did Matthias accomplish, as opposed to Paul?
 
R

Rosesrock

Guest
I like how some people place a stake in the moral high ground and say we are just supposed to roll over when someone is a sociopath and spews their filth. As if feeling sorry for them will help them. I loathe the thought that the men in scripture were delicate little flowers who didn't get all up in someones grill when it was required.
I love some good testostrone slingin...proceed, btwwhen i ask my hub to open the jar it's not because he's afraid of it.
 
3

3Scoreand10

Guest
I've always wondered about drawing lots and Matthias, just an opinion, but this a rather strange way to fix the authority of the Lord upon somebody, as also evidence by what did Matthias accomplish, as opposed to Paul?
I have wondered also.
Was Peter following the leadership of the Spirit, or was Peter being Peter again?
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
A couple of points to ponder my friend....

1. Judas committed suicide after he had seen he betrayed innocent blood and could not be listed in the 12 that seen Jesus after the resurrection
2. The choosing of an Apostle by lot happened after chapter one in Acts when Jesus ascended....Cephas being Peter and the 12 which equals 13.....

So...seeing Judas was dead who was number 12 and 13? Just a point to ponder......Was it Matthias and Paul? Could Paul as a Pharisee seen him after his resurrection? He did by Revelation, but not until after the ascension....that we know of....
I think I get what you're saying. You seem to be saying that Matthias wasn't yet chosen, so he couldn't have been number 12, but here are some things to consider in relation to that. According to Acts chapter 1 verses 21 and 22, here were the qualifications which needed to be met for Judas' replacement:

Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us,
Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection.

Matthias, Judas' replacement, apparently was in company with the other 11 Apostles all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among them, beginning from the baptism of John right up unto the day that Jesus ascended back to heaven. Also, although Matthew's and Mark's gospel accounts seem to indicate that Jesus only appeared to the 11 after He rose from the dead, Luke's gospel records this in chapter 24 verses 33 thru 36:

And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them,
Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon.
And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread.
And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.

Jesus appeared after His resurrection to more than just the eleven in that He also appeared to them that were with the eleven Apostles and I personally believe that Matthias was one of the them that were with them and Acts chapter 1 seems to confirm this. As such, I believe that Matthias was number 12 and Paul might not have even been number 13. Barnabas is also called an Apostle in Acts chapter 14 verse 14. Did he become an Apostle before or after Paul did? The Bible also calls others Apostles besides the twelve, Paul and Barnabas.
 

Reborn

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2014
4,087
217
63
I love some good testostrone slingin...proceed, btwwhen i ask my hub to open the jar it's not because he's afraid of it.
What Sirk said is true.
What you say here is the truth.

EVERYONE claims they hate the bickering, but how do they even know that we are doing that?

Because they watch and read.
We say what others think. :p
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
I have wondered also.
Was Peter following the leadership of the Spirit, or was Peter being Peter again?
Again, it's just opinion, but if there's a doctrine of drawing lots, should we perhaps be drawing lots to make decisions one way or another which are difficult? Is it like God is in the dice? It's just very peculiar, to say somebody has a 50/50 chance of being an apostle, and to presume God's intervention in a matter of chance. Also, the twelve apostles' names are on the foundations of the New Jerusalem (Rev. 21:14). Paul, who was an apostle, is then excluded? Seems we'd need thirteen foundations, to work in Matthias and Paul.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Probably Mattias. Paul a few veres later says 'and last of all seen of ME as one born out of due time'.
Yeah that is why I said Paul didn't see him till after the ascension......still leaves an extra number doesn't it....Peter plus the 12 is 13 and lastly Paul.....??
 
R

Rosesrock

Guest
What Sirk said is true.
What you say here is the truth.

EVERYONE claims they hate the bickering, but how do they even know that we are doing that?

Because they watch and read.
We say what others think. :p
My post was refering to the delicate flower comment sirk made.
 

Reborn

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2014
4,087
217
63
My post was refering to the delicate flower comment sirk made.
I know.

I like how you flat out admitted that you watch and read.
I was giving you a high five. :)
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
I have wondered also.
Was Peter following the leadership of the Spirit, or was Peter being Peter again?
It does say that men cast lots and the whole disposing thereof is of the Lord........I have made a few decisions with a coin toss and they have for the most part came out good....a few times I went two out of three because I didn't like the result and it did go as well ;) HAHAHHA
 
R

Rosesrock

Guest
I know.

I like how you flat out admitted that you watch and read.
I was giving you a high five. :)
Of course i do, who can get a word in.....,rofl
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
Barnabas is also called an Apostle in Acts chapter 14 verse 14. Did he become an Apostle before or after Paul did? The Bible also calls others Apostles besides the twelve, Paul and Barnabas.
That's really a great catch! Now we have a proper can of worms. I insist on voting Paul's name on one foundation of the New Jerusalem. (That and a dollar will get you a cup of coffee... wait... not even that, at Starbucks!)
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Again, it's just opinion, but if there's a doctrine of drawing lots, should we perhaps be drawing lots to make decisions one way or another which are difficult? Is it like God is in the dice? It's just very peculiar, to say somebody has a 50/50 chance of being an apostle, and to presume God's intervention in a matter of chance. Also, the twelve apostles' names are on the foundations of the New Jerusalem (Rev. 21:14). Paul, who was an apostle, is then excluded? Seems we'd need thirteen foundations, to work in Matthias and Paul.
Brother... see post 131.....I have one more than one occasion made a choice by tossing a coin and letting the whole disposing thereof to be of the Lord which is applied unto lots in the O.T.
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
Brother... see post 131.....I have one more than one occasion made a choice by tossing a coin and letting the whole disposing thereof to be of the Lord which is applied unto lots in the O.T.

I saw that. Well, in that case, think I'll grab a roll of quarters and head for the Indian reservation, to sort some difficult scripture questions! (Study to show thyself lucky and approved unto God, you know...)
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113

I saw that. Well, in that case, think I'll grab a roll of quarters and head for the Indian reservation, to sort some difficult scripture questions! (Study to show thyself lucky and approved unto God, you know...)
HAHA funny......! ;)
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
Yeah that is why I said Paul didn't see him till after the ascension......still leaves an extra number doesn't it....Peter plus the 12 is 13 and lastly Paul.....??
I don't think that it's Peter plus the 12. When Paul said in I Corinthians chapter 15 verse 5 that Jesus was seen of Cephas or Peter, then the twelve, I don't believe that he was separating Peter from the 12, but merely saying that Peter saw Jesus alone and then later saw Him again as part of the 12 and the gospels seem to confirm this if we do a comparative study. Mark chapter 16 verse 7 says But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you. Here, Peter seems to be set apart from the rest of the disciples in relation to seeing Jesus. Luke chapter 24 verse 34 says Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon and that was spoken by the two men to whom Jesus appeared on the road to Emmaus. It seems to me that Jesus appeared to Simon Peter or Cephas before He appeared to the 12 as a group and that this is what Paul was referring to in the order of Christ's appearings in I Corinthians chapter 15.
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
Again, it's just opinion, but if there's a doctrine of drawing lots, should we perhaps be drawing lots to make decisions one way or another which are difficult? Is it like God is in the dice? It's just very peculiar, to say somebody has a 50/50 chance of being an apostle, and to presume God's intervention in a matter of chance. Also, the twelve apostles' names are on the foundations of the New Jerusalem (Rev. 21:14). Paul, who was an apostle, is then excluded? Seems we'd need thirteen foundations, to work in Matthias and Paul.
I don't believe Matthias was an Apostle. God Chooses Apostles.

Peter had already disobeyed the Lord.......before he cast lots for Matthias.

The Lord commanded Peter NOT to leave Jerusalem In Acts 1:4. Peter was to stay in Jerusalem and wait for the Holy Spirit.

If you look in Acts 1:12 Peter was not in Jerusalem, He was about a days journey AWAY from Jerusalem, in an upper room at a place they were staying. Peter was commanded to to stay in Jerusalem and WAIT. Peter wasn't in Jerusalem and Peter didn't wait.

It is why we never hear of Matthias again. The Lord chooses Apostles, not men.
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
I don't believe Matthias was an Apostle. God Chooses Apostles.

Peter had already disobeyed the Lord.......before he cast lots for Matthias.

The Lord commanded Peter NOT to leave Jerusalem In Acts 1:4. Peter was to stay in Jerusalem and wait for the Holy Spirit.

If you look in Acts 1:12 Peter was not in Jerusalem, He was about a days journey AWAY from Jerusalem, in an upper room at a place they were staying. Peter was commanded to to stay in Jerusalem and WAIT. Peter wasn't in Jerusalem and Peter didn't wait.

It is why we never hear of Matthias again. The Lord chooses Apostles, not men.
Yes, and the arguments involving such as lots in Proverbs, I forget where offhand, and being referred to as of twelve, afterwards in Acts a time or two, these things supporting Matthias was legitimate aren't conclusive. But this is also to say there's no certainty he was not legitimate, either, one of those things none of us can "epignosis" know.
 
Last edited by a moderator: