Since we have seen so many threads grinding on about women being submissive in a marriage, I thought I'd try starting a discussion about men being the head of the household.
What does that even mean?
Some people claim it's that the man holds all the final decision-making powers with important choices. Some claim that the man holds all the decision-making powers, no matter how minor. Some claim that it means that a man is an overt leader. Others claim that it means the man is a servant leader. Some say that the man is the head, but the wife is the neck. Some claim that the man is the "king of his castle," others claim "happy wife, happy life." I wonder if it actually means ONE thing.
For example, the "traditional" idealized, circa 1950s, family model presents a kind of leadership where the man is working to support the family (more than likely outside of the home), and the wife stays home to maintain the house and care for the children.
Is it possible that a man can be the head of his household and send his wife off to her job while he stays home to care for the house and nurture the children? Would people consider this man a leader? Or would this violate the biblical mandate?
I'm not a wife, but I do have quite a bit of experience with leadership, and what I've discovered about leadership is that it's not ONE THING. There are all kinds of leaders and leadership styles out there. It seems to me that some might elevate one kind of style (i.e. the "traditional nuclear family") and proclaim that other styles are unbiblical. However, this seems based on a rather biased interpretation, imo.
What do y'all think?
What does that even mean?
Some people claim it's that the man holds all the final decision-making powers with important choices. Some claim that the man holds all the decision-making powers, no matter how minor. Some claim that it means that a man is an overt leader. Others claim that it means the man is a servant leader. Some say that the man is the head, but the wife is the neck. Some claim that the man is the "king of his castle," others claim "happy wife, happy life." I wonder if it actually means ONE thing.
For example, the "traditional" idealized, circa 1950s, family model presents a kind of leadership where the man is working to support the family (more than likely outside of the home), and the wife stays home to maintain the house and care for the children.
Is it possible that a man can be the head of his household and send his wife off to her job while he stays home to care for the house and nurture the children? Would people consider this man a leader? Or would this violate the biblical mandate?
I'm not a wife, but I do have quite a bit of experience with leadership, and what I've discovered about leadership is that it's not ONE THING. There are all kinds of leaders and leadership styles out there. It seems to me that some might elevate one kind of style (i.e. the "traditional nuclear family") and proclaim that other styles are unbiblical. However, this seems based on a rather biased interpretation, imo.
What do y'all think?