Young Earth Creation. Does it matter what you believe?
- Thread starter Preach2u
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Hey Josh.....Oh I do have a view, but the view I have does not change what I believe about JESUS......He is Lord and savior, creator and sustainer, the beginner and finisher of my eternal salvation......I have acknowledged him by faith and he has promised to give me eternal life based upon said belief.....Having said that.....I know God created it all and whether it was 6 actual 24 hour periods labeled as days or an original creation to be wrecked and renovated in 6 24 hour periods labeled as days is irrelevant to me.......I have bigger fish to fry bro......
Ok for me, the creation VS. evolution controversy is not a science vs. religion conflict. It is a worldview vs. worldview conflict. There are 2 types of science: operational and historical. The controversey arises from differing assumptions in historical science.
Operational or observational science is the repeatable day to day scientific investigation I recognize as everyday science. Historical or origins science is the imagined reconstruction of the unobserved past based on circumstantial evidence existing in the present.
what say you?
Operational or observational science is the repeatable day to day scientific investigation I recognize as everyday science. Historical or origins science is the imagined reconstruction of the unobserved past based on circumstantial evidence existing in the present.
what say you?
E
Why so you can deny them. You think we are stupid.
Some has been shown already, you either completely ignored them, or downplayed them.
Like I said earlier, You have no open to heart. why are you even here? I have yet to see you do anything but slam YEC's. I am amazed at the grace you have been shown by this site.
if someone is really interested. they are free to ask.
Some has been shown already, you either completely ignored them, or downplayed them.
Like I said earlier, You have no open to heart. why are you even here? I have yet to see you do anything but slam YEC's. I am amazed at the grace you have been shown by this site.
if someone is really interested. they are free to ask.
I know right? To be very honest I don't know how he's avoided being banned for spamming the same thing over and over and over and over and over, and like you said I've seen many people try to hold an actual civil conversation with him to be met with a brick wall or backhanded insult to their intelligence. He is the first person I've come across here that truly made me love the ignore option. You don't even have to wonder what his hidden comments say, it's mocking people for believing the 6,000 year old earth, and/or humans and dinosaurs living together. I have never seen a troll of this magnitude and that added so little to any conversation last so long here. I love not seeing his comments.
R
um...i hate to rain on your parade but...
old earth creationism hasn't exactly gotten to establish its claims in peer reviewed science journals either!
i mean when is the last time you read something like 'the horse sequence as an incremental series of divine creations' in the journal of evolutionary biology?
now if we can dispense with any further pseudo academic smoke blowing from you...maybe we can actually have that scientific discussion of the evidence that you have been avoiding for the past couple of weeks...
old earth creationism hasn't exactly gotten to establish its claims in peer reviewed science journals either!
i mean when is the last time you read something like 'the horse sequence as an incremental series of divine creations' in the journal of evolutionary biology?
now if we can dispense with any further pseudo academic smoke blowing from you...maybe we can actually have that scientific discussion of the evidence that you have been avoiding for the past couple of weeks...
R
when was the last time 'nature' agreed that 'God used evolution' as the theistic evolutionists claim? when was the last time 'nature' agreed that the fossil record shows an incremental series of divine creations instead of a process of evolution as the progressive creationists claim?
i will say the same thing to you that i said to jackh...stop with the smoke blowing appeals to the academic journals...and actually show that you are willing to discuss the science...
i will say the same thing to you that i said to jackh...stop with the smoke blowing appeals to the academic journals...and actually show that you are willing to discuss the science...
R
i am just going to post the same thing i posted today on another thread to refute your faulty logic...read it and don't respond this time until you actually understand...
in high school i took calculus... now suppose i taught some calculus to a bunch of people here on this site...
would you then claim that everyone on christian chat 'got their calculus from' my high school teacher?
no...because that line of reasoning...the one you have been using here...is absurd...
in high school i took calculus... now suppose i taught some calculus to a bunch of people here on this site...
would you then claim that everyone on christian chat 'got their calculus from' my high school teacher?
no...because that line of reasoning...the one you have been using here...is absurd...