-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
In another thread here, an American (I can't remember who) reckons that non-Yanks should not comment on U.S. affairs.
So I venture forth with trepidation,
I do not believe for one moment that Obama would initiate any attack against Russia - let alone a nuclear strike.
To this outsider-looking in, he appears to have been the least warlike U.S. President in the last half century.
Apart from the unavoidable confrontation with the Isis loonies, he seems to have scaled down American meddling in the Middle East and elsewhere.
And, unlike his predecessors, he has waged no new wars during his term.
No attacks have been made on small Asian or Central American countries which posed no possible threat to the USA - which is a refreshing change.
So I venture forth with trepidation,
I do not believe for one moment that Obama would initiate any attack against Russia - let alone a nuclear strike.
To this outsider-looking in, he appears to have been the least warlike U.S. President in the last half century.
Apart from the unavoidable confrontation with the Isis loonies, he seems to have scaled down American meddling in the Middle East and elsewhere.
And, unlike his predecessors, he has waged no new wars during his term.
No attacks have been made on small Asian or Central American countries which posed no possible threat to the USA - which is a refreshing change.
S
In another thread here, an American (I can't remember who) reckons that non-Yanks should not comment on U.S. affairs.
So I venture forth with trepidation,
I do not believe for one moment that Obama would initiate any attack against Russia - let alone a nuclear strike.
To this outsider-looking in, he appears to have been the least warlike U.S. President in the last half century.
Apart from the unavoidable confrontation with the Isis loonies, he seems to have scaled down American meddling in the Middle East and elsewhere.
And, unlike his predecessors, he has waged no new wars during his term.
No attacks have been made on small Asian or Central American countries which posed no possible threat to the USA - which is a refreshing change.
So I venture forth with trepidation,
I do not believe for one moment that Obama would initiate any attack against Russia - let alone a nuclear strike.
To this outsider-looking in, he appears to have been the least warlike U.S. President in the last half century.
Apart from the unavoidable confrontation with the Isis loonies, he seems to have scaled down American meddling in the Middle East and elsewhere.
And, unlike his predecessors, he has waged no new wars during his term.
No attacks have been made on small Asian or Central American countries which posed no possible threat to the USA - which is a refreshing change.
C
Traditionally the u.s and Russia have always had a lot to loose, which prevents both of us from using nuclear weapons, even the ussr had alot they would loose if they were to go "over the edge" and into nuclear war. But today we are edging closer and closer to the edge. People are most dangerous when they have nothing to loose and their backs against the wall.
I think Russia and the u.s. Still have a little ways to go before nuclear conflict is seriously on the table, but I'm sure they have been getting everything ready to go hot if needed(continuity of government plans). I think it will take an economic collapse for us to get to there. But I wouldn't put nuclear war past the "globalists" In charge who look forward to a world without borders or countries. I wouldn't put starting something to bring in their agenda past them, were like pawns on a chessboard to them, they'll sacrifice as many as they need to accomplish their goals. Remember the saying "the ends justify the means".
All lo we can do is pray that Jesus and God will guide us.
I think Russia and the u.s. Still have a little ways to go before nuclear conflict is seriously on the table, but I'm sure they have been getting everything ready to go hot if needed(continuity of government plans). I think it will take an economic collapse for us to get to there. But I wouldn't put nuclear war past the "globalists" In charge who look forward to a world without borders or countries. I wouldn't put starting something to bring in their agenda past them, were like pawns on a chessboard to them, they'll sacrifice as many as they need to accomplish their goals. Remember the saying "the ends justify the means".
All lo we can do is pray that Jesus and God will guide us.
SIRK: "Instead, he has gutted our armed forces and appears to be turning their focus inward."
The U.S. armed forces sorely need "gutting" !
Some 1,000 military bases all over the globe,
an armada of nuclear armed warships intimidating all and sundry,
all manner of spooks and spies manipulating foreign governments - both friend and foe.
To our shame, governments like Australia's bow to Yank pressure and permit these installations within our borders.
We currently have three or four here with a large increase mooted for Darwin and a very big one planned for Townsville.
Makes us a target for sure when China or someone else tires of American aggression.
The U.S. armed forces sorely need "gutting" !
Some 1,000 military bases all over the globe,
an armada of nuclear armed warships intimidating all and sundry,
all manner of spooks and spies manipulating foreign governments - both friend and foe.
To our shame, governments like Australia's bow to Yank pressure and permit these installations within our borders.
We currently have three or four here with a large increase mooted for Darwin and a very big one planned for Townsville.
Makes us a target for sure when China or someone else tires of American aggression.
I really wish the world leaders look to more renewable resources. I mean, I can understand why we need fossil fuel like planes, homes, cars etc.. but in the meantime, we should also look towards other technology.
You want to know whats the real sad story is.... The oil and gas industry doesn't favour new technology, it's too risky..
risk to them means = uncertainity.. uncertainity means... cost.. and cost means less profit. Why change when things still works right? Why change when the money still comes rolling in.. heck, we are still getting money.. who cares about the future..
Sorry, I had to vent.
You want to know whats the real sad story is.... The oil and gas industry doesn't favour new technology, it's too risky..
risk to them means = uncertainity.. uncertainity means... cost.. and cost means less profit. Why change when things still works right? Why change when the money still comes rolling in.. heck, we are still getting money.. who cares about the future..
Sorry, I had to vent.
S
I really wish the world leaders look to more renewable resources. I mean, I can understand why we need fossil fuel like planes, homes, cars etc.. but in the meantime, we should also look towards other technology.
You want to know whats the real sad story is.... The oil and gas industry doesn't favour new technology, it's too risky..
risk to them means = uncertainity.. uncertainity means... cost.. and cost means less profit. Why change when things still works right? Why change when the money still comes rolling in.. heck, we are still getting money.. who cares about the future..
Sorry, I had to vent.
You want to know whats the real sad story is.... The oil and gas industry doesn't favour new technology, it's too risky..
risk to them means = uncertainity.. uncertainity means... cost.. and cost means less profit. Why change when things still works right? Why change when the money still comes rolling in.. heck, we are still getting money.. who cares about the future..
Sorry, I had to vent.
P
I really wish the world leaders look to more renewable resources. I mean, I can understand why we need fossil fuel like planes, homes, cars etc.. but in the meantime, we should also look towards other technology.
You want to know whats the real sad story is.... The oil and gas industry doesn't favour new technology, it's too risky..
risk to them means = uncertainity.. uncertainity means... cost.. and cost means less profit. Why change when things still works right? Why change when the money still comes rolling in.. heck, we are still getting money.. who cares about the future..
Sorry, I had to vent.
You want to know whats the real sad story is.... The oil and gas industry doesn't favour new technology, it's too risky..
risk to them means = uncertainity.. uncertainity means... cost.. and cost means less profit. Why change when things still works right? Why change when the money still comes rolling in.. heck, we are still getting money.. who cares about the future..
Sorry, I had to vent.
At first I thought "well 1 am is a good time to vent,then hit the sack"
Then it hit me. It is probably mid afternoon where you are.
P
In another thread here, an American (I can't remember who) reckons that non-Yanks should not comment on U.S. affairs.
So I venture forth with trepidation,
I do not believe for one moment that Obama would initiate any attack against Russia - let alone a nuclear strike.
To this outsider-looking in, he appears to have been the least warlike U.S. President in the last half century.
Apart from the unavoidable confrontation with the Isis loonies, he seems to have scaled down American meddling in the Middle East and elsewhere.
And, unlike his predecessors, he has waged no new wars during his term.
No attacks have been made on small Asian or Central American countries which posed no possible threat to the USA - which is a refreshing change.
So I venture forth with trepidation,
I do not believe for one moment that Obama would initiate any attack against Russia - let alone a nuclear strike.
To this outsider-looking in, he appears to have been the least warlike U.S. President in the last half century.
Apart from the unavoidable confrontation with the Isis loonies, he seems to have scaled down American meddling in the Middle East and elsewhere.
And, unlike his predecessors, he has waged no new wars during his term.
No attacks have been made on small Asian or Central American countries which posed no possible threat to the USA - which is a refreshing change.
egypt
Problem is resources are everywhere... Africa (Oil, gold etc..), Brazil (Oil), North Sea (Oil), Russia (LNG), Australia (Bauxite, LNG, iron ore, gold etc..)... these resources are everywhere, what makes Australia any special in resources.... Our price?
Australia is located far away from other countries. Who paid for the transportation cost?
Our manufacture industry is tiny compare to the rest of the world.
Do don't even have Holden/Ford manufacturing plant... close the Holden/Ford industry.. who supplies little parts to them.. the local medium/small business in Australia.. like plastic caps, etc..I'm honestly saying this with heavy heart.
Last edited: