Creation, The Flood, And Millions Of Years

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
T

Tintin

Guest
Huh?
Where is this?
Popeye, it was a question for the Gap believers, not biblical creationists. Obviously, death and disease only entered Creation when Adam and Eve rebelled against God.
 
P

popeye

Guest
So, the flowers of day three of creation weren't pollinated by the bees of either day 5 or 6 of creation for millions or billions of years? Please do tell us how that works.
Great point.

Wonder where the answer will come from???

Jack??,Jack???,are you there Jack???
 
P

popeye

Guest
Popeye, it was a question for the Gap believers, not biblical creationists. Obviously, death and disease only entered Creation when Adam and Eve rebelled against God.
Oh

Glad to see that.
 
Mar 20, 2015
768
13
0
If I answered that it would just be my own opinion based on interpretation of the Holy Scripture, all I am saying is that it is possible according to religious scholars and academics. To be honest I think it is an unimportant part of the Bible's actual message, what do I really know? who am I? who is anyone to say what is what?, because they all have Holy Spirit?
 
T

Tintin

Guest
Great point.

Wonder where the answer will come from???

Jack??,Jack???,are you there Jack???
Let's not encourage him to come back under yet another name. He's already slandered us on a blog site. Of course he conveniently lied about his own behaviour and misrepresented us. But I guess that's what non-believers posing as Christians do when they're caught.
 
Mar 20, 2015
768
13
0
death and disease only entered Creation when Adam and Eve rebelled against God.
Death and disease of human beings only? what about animal and plant life? what about seasons of the year? plants surely die off in seasons of the year?, would eden have had only one weather pattern or season?
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
Great point.

Wonder where the answer will come from???

Jack??,Jack???,are you there Jack???
I'm afraid that Jack doesn't know jack. haha.
 
P

popeye

Guest
Let's not encourage him to come back under yet another name. He's already slandered us on a blog site. Of course he conveniently lied about his own behaviour and misrepresented us. But I guess that's what non-believers posing as Christians do when they're caught.
Party pooper. Where is your sense of adventure?

Just joking.

Yes it is refreshing having that colorful character banished to darwin neverland.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
Death and disease of human beings only? what about animal and plant life? what about seasons of the year? plants surely die off in seasons of the year?, would eden have had only one weather pattern or season?
No, death and disease for all Creation. Seasons were there from the beginning, but more extreme following the Flood. Invertebrates and plants weren't considered nephesh chayyah (living creatures) by the ancient Hebrews. Therefore death didn't apply to them. That there is the cultural and linguistic context.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Context is key, absolutely, and yet the meaning of 'yom' is only ever questioned in early Genesis. Why is that? Oh, yes, the millions and billions of years of evolution and uniformitarianism.
LOL you've all got an obsession about millions and billions of years. Do you dream about it in your sleep? Perhaps you should see a psychiatrist? You have never heard me mention millions and billions of years, except when talking about what some others say. But then I view the matter calmly. It doesn't upset me. I realise how unimportant it is. I don't have to believe Tin Tin's word. I believe GOD's word, the God to whom a billion years is simply a moment of time.

By the way I question the meaning of yom all through the Bible.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
No, death and disease for all Creation. Seasons were there from the beginning, but more extreme following the Flood. Invertebrates and plants weren't considered nephesh chayyah (living creatures) by the ancient Hebrews. Therefore death didn't apply to them. That there is the cultural and linguistic context.
Where does Scripture SAY that there was no death and disease before man? That is simply your speculation.

why did God have to appoint man to control the living creatures, and why did He use such a violent word about that control?
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
Where does Scripture SAY that there was no death and disease before man? That is simply your speculation.
Romans chapter 5 verses 12 thru 14

Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
(For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
How long was Yom Kippur?
Actually we don't know originally. Did they mean the period of light in which it was observed? It began at dawn and finished at sunset. Or did it mean something else? Jesus said that there were 12 hours in the equivalent of the yom. The meaning of yom is flexible

So your question is irrelevant. How long was the yom in the yom of the Lord? how long was the initial yom in Gen 1.3?. How long was the yom in Gen 2.4?. One swallow doesn't make a summer.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Romans chapter 5 verses 12 thru 14

Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
(For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
If you read that with a little more discernment you will see that it is referring to man, and man alone. It has nothing to do with the death of living creatures.
 
Last edited:
P

purgedconscience

Guest
If you read that with a little more discernment you will see that it is referring to man, and man alone. It has nothing to do with the death of living creatures.
Not so. This same Paul said a little later on in this same epistle:

Romans chapter 8 verses 18 thru 22

For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.
For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.
For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.


According to Paul, all of creation became subject to vanity, not willing, but by reason of him, ADAM, who subjected the same when he sinned.

There goes your argument right down the drain.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Not so. This same Paul said a little later on in this same epistle:

Romans chapter 8 verses 18 thru 22

For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.
For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.
For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.


According to Paul, all of creation became subject to vanity, not willing, but by reason of him, ADAM, who subjected the same when he sinned.

There goes your argument right down the drain.
Yes the creature was made subject to 'vanity'. But we are not told at what point. There is no mention of it being due to the Fall. The One Who has subjected the same in hope is God, not Adam. There are no grounds at all apart from speculation for assuming that living creatures would not die.

Adam would only continue to live because he ate of the tree of life. That suggests that without it he too would die. The living creatures did not have the right to eat of the tree of life.

Now whose argument goes down the drain? :)
 
Last edited:
P

purgedconscience

Guest
Yes the creature was made subject to 'vanity'. But we are not told at what point. There is no mention of it being due to the Fall. The One Who has subjected the same in hope is God, not Adam. There are no grounds at all apart from speculation for assuming that living creatures would not die.
Look at the text again:

Romans chapter 8 verses 18 thru 22

For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.
For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.
For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.

The creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption.

When did the creature become subject to the bondage of corruption and why is the creature's liberty from the same directly linked to the time when the sons of God receive their glorified bodies?

Did the creature become subject to bondage prior to the time when man became subject to the same?

If so, then when was this?

Everything was very good initially, right?

When did the bondage of corruption enter the picture?

Did God just arbitrarily subject the creature/creation to the bondage of corruption for no reason after He had seen everything that He had made and called it very good?

What was the cause of the creature/creation being made subject to the bondage of corruption and if said bondage of corruption has nothing to do with Adam's sin and the fall of man, then why do both get liberated at the same time?
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Look at the text again:

Romans chapter 8 verses 18 thru 22

For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.
For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.
For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.
For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.

The creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption.

When did the creature become subject to the bondage of corruption and why is the creature's liberty from the same directly linked to the time when the sons of God receive their glorified bodies?

Did the creature become subject to bondage prior to the time when man became subject to the same?

If so, then when was this?

Everything was very good initially, right?

When did the bondage of corruption enter the picture?

Did God just arbitrarily subject the creature/creation to the bondage of corruption for no reason after He had seen everything that He had made and called it very good?

What was the cause of the creature/creation being made subject to the bondage of corruption and if said bondage of corruption has nothing to do with Adam's sin and the fall of man, then why do both get liberated at the same time?
the creature became subject to the bondage of corruption when it was created. Adam would escape that bondage by eating of the tree of life (otherwise why the need for the tree of life?)

what you overlook is that the Fall was not unanticipated. It was all part of God's plan. Through the Fall man also became subject to corruption. The emphasis in Romans 8 is that all corruption will cease. Do you really believe that all living creatures will be resurrected?