Re-thinking good and evil
- Thread starter realchild4life
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A
Sadly, where you defeat is so obvious is you think you come up with answers all on your own. The criteria isn't merely lacking in that presupposition. It's nonexistent.
You're relying on there is no truth as truth, then ask us to back up truth, and talk about you thinking over truth, when, in truth, you swear truth doesn't exist. The Jabberywocky makes more sense than that.
Kind of tells me maybe you're not as good fetching world views and understanding them as you think. What's wrong with a view that's been proven? It sure beats there is no truth as a presup.
You're relying on there is no truth as truth, then ask us to back up truth, and talk about you thinking over truth, when, in truth, you swear truth doesn't exist. The Jabberywocky makes more sense than that.
Kind of tells me maybe you're not as good fetching world views and understanding them as you think. What's wrong with a view that's been proven? It sure beats there is no truth as a presup.
A
I've covered this more than once for Real. He prefers the darkness to hide his sins. (Unaware we've been shining light in his dark spot all this time. Boy! What happens when you're so fixated on sin you don't even know it's hidden anymore. Been there. Done that.)
John 3:16-21 16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. 19 And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. 20 For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God.”
John 3:16-21 16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. 19 And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. 20 For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God.”
What does it matter what He said if Jesus is not the Truth, as you believe, since you believe there is no truth? Why quote someone if nothing they say is true, because there's no truth? Do you believe it is the truth that Jesus said that? And do you believe what He said is truth?
What's a lie when there's no truth? What constitutes fake, with no real to base it on?
Or is there really truth as a reference point, to know what a lie is?
On what do you base your admonition of Tintin?
If you see something as just an act, then you must believe there is something being portrayed that is not based in truth. You must compare this portrayal to truth to come to the conclusion that it is, indeed, an act. If there is no truth, what is an act?
You reveal over and over in your posts that even you don't believe it when you say there's no truth. Because when you speak without monitoring your every word to make absolutely sure that it fits neatly into your erroneous philosophy, you let us all see the gaping holes in your logic, and the many contradictions within your own words. You can't even keep up with yourself. Your mistakes in keeping with your own philosophy put it plainly for everyone to see that no matter how many times you say there's no truth, how loud you say it, how many people you say it to, etc., you know there is truth. That is revealed in the fact that you use truth to judge fake and lies in your own admonition. And then what: It ends up admonishing you.
There is truth. You might as well stop trying to convince us otherwise because you can't even convince yourself.
What's a lie when there's no truth? What constitutes fake, with no real to base it on?
Or is there really truth as a reference point, to know what a lie is?
On what do you base your admonition of Tintin?
If you see something as just an act, then you must believe there is something being portrayed that is not based in truth. You must compare this portrayal to truth to come to the conclusion that it is, indeed, an act. If there is no truth, what is an act?
You reveal over and over in your posts that even you don't believe it when you say there's no truth. Because when you speak without monitoring your every word to make absolutely sure that it fits neatly into your erroneous philosophy, you let us all see the gaping holes in your logic, and the many contradictions within your own words. You can't even keep up with yourself. Your mistakes in keeping with your own philosophy put it plainly for everyone to see that no matter how many times you say there's no truth, how loud you say it, how many people you say it to, etc., you know there is truth. That is revealed in the fact that you use truth to judge fake and lies in your own admonition. And then what: It ends up admonishing you.
There is truth. You might as well stop trying to convince us otherwise because you can't even convince yourself.
Last edited:
