The Absolutism of Verb Tense

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,400
113
#61
I wasn't familiar with that word so I looked it up. Are you sure that's the word you want to use here? ;)
Yes I chose that word in particular based upon point 2 of your post ;)

The verb tenses used by God are absolute in what they stand for and imply...they cannot be ignored and or swept under the rug so as to espouse a doctrine that disagrees with the tenses of the verbs inspired brother......because to do so is to change the context and what was said and or implied......no different than what Satan did by ADDING a word......God said to not ADD nor DIMINISH one word...to do so changes what was inspired of God....
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
#62
The down payment of our eternal inheritance IS NOT MONEY.....surely you can SEE that! The bible is clear...that which is born of the SPIRIT is SPIRIT and HIS SEED remaineth in YOU....to say one can be unsealed is moronic!
Paul used the example of "earnest money" to describe the Holy Spirit whether you like it or not. Of course, I'm not suggesting that the Holy Spirit is money, but in the same manner in which "earnest money" can be returned to the purchaser IN FULL, so, too, can "the earnest of the Spirit" be returned IN FULL to the purchaser or else Paul's analogy fails terribly. Of course, we both know that Paul regularly warned the Christians to whom he was writing about possibly "falling away", but, seemingly, only one of us is willing and wise enough to actually take heed to such repeated warnings.

"Moronic"? Be careful or else our unbiased crossnote will call you out for improper "netiquette" and others will unbiasedly "like" it when he does. Right, crossnote and others?

Anyhow, whether you like it or not, a "seal" can be broken. The same Greek word which is used to describe the "seal" of the Holy Spirit was used to describe the "seal" which was placed upon Jesus' tomb and the "seals" which Jesus opened in the book of Revelation. Were those "seals" opened? Of course, they were. Furthermore, a "seal" signified the following:

seal.png

Do you honestly believe that such a "seal" cannot be opened? Don't kid yourself. You somewhat amaze me. On the one hand, you seem to show due diligence in examining the Greek (when convenient) and so forth, yet, on the other hand, you seem perfectly willing to ignore the Greek ("believes" as a continual action as opposed to an initial one time event) when convenient and also to ignore what certain terms (like "earnest" and "seal") employed by Paul or others actually mean.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,400
113
#63
Everything is conditional. "He that believeth" denotes a condition. It is not a one time ordeal, but a lifetime conviction. Jesus also said; "He that endureth to the end shall be saved" (Matthew 10:22). Osas would seem to omit enduring for more than a brief moment? jmo
Several things wrong with this post...like...

1. Not every place saved is used is talking about soul salvation.........
2. Once one has believed the faith of Christ takes over and HE cannot deny HIMSELF
3. Go study the verb tenses which is what this thread is all about......especially the AORIST tense verb and the PERFECT tense verb!
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
#64
Sound like you have had a long row to hoe.....and some tragic consequences.....You know...a surgeon messed up my handicapped child which resulted in millions of dollars worth of care over the last 20 years....many pushed me to sue and I chose not to....the money would not have changed what the surgeon done......and I am sure you know there is four ways to view your difficulties....

1. Time and chance happen unto all
2. Your are being tested to increase your faith
3. Learning to be obedient through the things which you are suffering
4. Your being chastised because you are in error

I hope you are honest with what is taking place friend and I will pray for you, but seeing how I believe in eternal security are you sure you want me praying for you :)
I am being honest and, beyond my own honesty, I've diligently sought the Lord for years to get His perspective of what's been transpiring in my life in that He can never be misled. I've concluded that the first 3 apply and not the 4th. This is not to say that I've never been chastised in my life due to error on my part because the Lord has chastised me many times for the same over the years and I've repented every time that He has.

As far as "eternal security" is concerned, my beliefs aren't that complex. I believe that we're "eternally secure" as long as we truly abide in Christ and I fully intend to do just that. I'm quite "secure" IN CHRIST and I take heed to the warnings in that I never intend to depart FROM HIM.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,400
113
#65
Paul used the example of "earnest money" to describe the Holy Spirit whether you like it or not. Of course, I'm not suggesting that the Holy Spirit is money, but in the same manner in which "earnest money" can be returned to the purchaser IN FULL, so, too, can "the earnest of the Spirit" be returned IN FULL to the purchaser or else Paul's analogy fails terribly. Of course, we both know that Paul regularly warned the Christians to whom he was writing about possibly "falling away", but, seemingly, only one of us is willing and wise enough to actually take heed to such repeated warnings.

"Moronic"? Be careful or else our unbiased crossnote will call you out for improper "netiquette" and others will unbiasedly "like" it when he does. Right, crossnote and others?

Anyhow, whether you like it or not, a "seal" can be broken. The same Greek word which is used to describe the "seal" of the Holy Spirit was used to describe the "seal" which was placed upon Jesus' tomb and the "seals" which Jesus opened in the book of Revelation. Were those "seals" opened? Of course, they were. Furthermore, a "seal" signified the following:

View attachment 134055

Do you honestly believe that such a "seal" cannot be opened? Don't kid yourself. You somewhat amaze me. On the one hand, you seem to show due diligence in examining the Greek (when convenient) and so forth, yet, on the other hand, you seem perfectly willing to ignore the Greek ("believes" as a continual action as opposed to an initial one time event) when convenient and also to ignore what certain terms (like "earnest" and "seal") employed by Paul or others actually mean.
Oh don't worry bro..I have been called on it before.....Actually I am rather consistent with the use of the Greek....I understand fully a present continuing result from a past completed action. I understand fully that it is God that seals and what he does is ETERNAL..I understand fully that it is the perfect, unfailing faith of Christ that actually saves me..I understand perfectly that the grace of God out bounds my sin...I understand fully that his seed (God's) REMAINS in me...I understand fully that a BIRTH cannot be UNDONE and once someone is BORN of GOD'S SPIRIT that it cannot be UNDONE...I understand that not every place the word saved is used that it implies soul salvation....I understand that the KING JIM is a transliteration and has had numerous things added by men who erroneously believed in religious works for salvation (Episcopalians) and I can go on ALL day long with such statements......There is not one verse anywhere that states verbatim or implies that GOD will unseal you once you have been sealed...NOT ONE......and for the record...I was not calling you a moron......just the thought that ONE can UNSEAL themselves and or a SEAL placed by God can be UNSEALED or BROKEN....JESUS said all who have believed in me (past tense) will be raised up at the LAST DAY period!
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
#66
The down payment of our eternal inheritance IS NOT MONEY.....surely you can SEE that! The bible is clear...that which is born of the SPIRIT is SPIRIT and HIS SEED remaineth in YOU....to say one can be unsealed is moronic!
KJV 2 Cor. 1:22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in ourhearts.

"sealed" is in the culminative Aorist tense. It points to the finality of our sealing. He has put His brand on us.

DC, I wonder how many in the Loss of salvation camp would argue that Cain could lose His mark that God put on Him?

King James Bible
And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

We should start a thread and see how many people believe Cain could lose his mark.
 
P

phil112

Guest
#67
Paul used the example of "earnest money" to describe the Holy Spirit .............................
I'm unfamiliar with that passage. Can you post chapter and verse for me please?
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
#68
Several things wrong with this post...like...

1. Not every place saved is used is talking about soul salvation.........
2. Once one has believed the faith of Christ takes over and HE cannot deny HIMSELF
3. Go study the verb tenses which is what this thread is all about......especially the AORIST tense verb and the PERFECT tense verb!
Oh, please. You're totally taking that verse out of context:

"It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him: If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us: If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself." (II Timothy 2:11-13)

What is it about "if we deny Him, He also will deny us" that you don't understand? Christ cannot deny Himself, but He certainly can and will deny us if we deny Him:

"Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven." (Matthew 10:32-33)
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,400
113
#69
KJV 2 Cor. 1:22 Who hath also sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in ourhearts.

"sealed" is in the culminative Aorist tense. It points to the finality of our sealing. He has put His brand on us.

DC, I wonder how many in the Loss of salvation camp would argue that Cain could lose His mark that God put on Him?

King James Bible
And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

We should start a thread and see how many people believe Cain could lose his mark.
Amen brother and that is the exact reason for this thread...the verb tenses inspired of God must be rejected and swept under the rug to teach the loss of salvation or the breaking of the seal etc.......
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
#70
I'm unfamiliar with that passage. Can you post chapter and verse for me please?
Sure. I gave the three references here:

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/120721-absolutism-verb-tense-3.html#post2251700

"Earnest" is a real estate term and it describes the "earnest money" that a potential buyer puts down as a downpayment which signifies that he/she "earnestly" intends to complete the purchase at a future time. However, "earnest money" can be returned to the purchaser for different reasons and I've personally had my own "earnest money" returned to me IN FULL twice within just the last 5 years when the houses which I "earnestly" intended to purchase failed inspection.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,400
113
#71
Oh, please. You're totally taking that verse out of context:

"It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him: If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us: If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself." (II Timothy 2:11-13)

What is it about "if we deny Him, He also will deny us" that you don't understand? Christ cannot deny Himself, but He certainly can and will deny us if we deny Him:

"Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven." (Matthew 10:32-33)
Does the bible deal with the saved and the lost? Obviously!

I suggest you study the word deny.....

it means to REJECT, abnegate, to refuse<----the lost do this.....

Someone who has RECIEVED him are BORN again by the SPIRIT of GOD...

Just like a preacher standing in the pulpit saying......to the CHURCH MEMBERS...You believe on Jesus you are saved...you REJECT Jesus you are lost and will end up in hell......

The audience PAUL writes to and teaches and the way speech works is inclusive of statements to the saved as well as the lost...wake up friend....Paul was simple saying generically that if we reject Christ he will reject US and is no different than the hundreds of thousands of preachers through the ages who made similar statements........WOW! talk about allowing one's belief to drive what the word states instead of just using common sense and spiritual insight to allow the word to speak!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,400
113
#72
Sure. I gave the three references here:

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/120721-absolutism-verb-tense-3.html#post2251700

"Earnest" is a real estate term and it describes the "earnest money" that a potential buyer puts down as a downpayment which signifies that he/she "earnestly" intends to complete the purchase at a future time. However, "earnest money" can be returned to the purchaser for different reasons and I've personally had my own "earnest money" returned to me IN FULL twice within just the last 5 years when the houses which I "earnestly" intended to purchase failed inspection.
Read post 66 and be honest with the verb tense INSPIRED by God!
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
#73
Oh don't worry bro..I have been called on it before.....Actually I am rather consistent with the use of the Greek....I understand fully a present continuing result from a past completed action.
And yet "believes" isn't "a past completed action" as you well know and choose to ignore.

I understand fully that it is God that seals and what he does is ETERNAL..I understand fully that it is the perfect, unfailing faith of Christ that actually saves me..I understand perfectly that the grace of God out bounds my sin...I understand fully that his seed (God's) REMAINS in me...I understand fully that a BIRTH cannot be UNDONE and once someone is BORN of GOD'S SPIRIT that it cannot be UNDONE...I understand that not every place the word saved is used that it implies soul salvation....I understand that the KING JIM is a transliteration and has had numerous things added by men who erroneously believed in religious works for salvation (Episcopalians) and I can go on ALL day long with such statements......There is not one verse anywhere that states verbatim or implies that GOD will unseal you once you have been sealed...NOT ONE......and for the record...I was not calling you a moron......just the thought that ONE can UNSEAL themselves and or a SEAL placed by God can be UNSEALED or BROKEN....JESUS said all who have believed in me (past tense) will be raised up at the LAST DAY period!
Apparently, you fail to consider or willfully ignore that "seals" can be broken, that "earnest money" can be returned to the buyer IN FULL, that someone who is "espoused" to another, as we're presently "espoused to Christ", can be "put away", etc., etc., etc.

Seriously, why do you suppose that all of these types of analogies have been employed throughout the Bible? So that we can ignore them and their implications?
 
P

phil112

Guest
#74
Sure. I gave the three references here:

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/120721-absolutism-verb-tense-3.html#post2251700

"Earnest" is a real estate term and it describes the "earnest money" that a potential buyer puts down as a downpayment which signifies that he/she "earnestly" intends to complete the purchase at a future time. However, "earnest money" can be returned to the purchaser for different reasons and I've personally had my own "earnest money" returned to me IN FULL twice within just the last 5 years when the houses which I "earnestly" intended to purchase failed inspection.
I see. I hadn't read the thread.
Altho I understand your point, I think it does the passage an injustice to use the word money. Money isn't something the bible looks on favorably, and an earnest deposit here clearly isn't money.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,400
113
#75
And yet "believes" isn't "a past completed action" as you well know and choose to ignore.

Apparently, you fail to consider or willfully ignore that "seals" can be broken, that "earnest money" can be returned to the buyer IN FULL, that someone who is "espoused" to another, as we're presently "espoused to Christ", can be "put away", etc., etc., etc.

Seriously, why do you suppose that all of these types of analogies have been employed throughout the Bible? So that we can ignore them and their implications?
I can just as easily use the same words to accurately describe your actions...wilfully ignoring verb tense, reading in things not there, bringing God and what he does down to a man's level, failing to consider that what God does it is FOREVER etc......so....you keep believing you can lose your salvation....I will keep believing in eternal security and God keeping his word while taking into account the verb tenses inspired by God which you seem to ignore because it contradicts your current belief...read post 66 and come on board with the truth friend! Humble yourself to the truth!
 
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
#76
[SUP]17 [/SUP]For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.

[SUP]22 [/SUP]But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
[SUP]23 [/SUP]Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law(Galatians 5:17-23).

There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
[SUP]2 [/SUP]For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
[SUP]3 [/SUP]For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
[SUP]4 [/SUP]That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
[SUP]5 [/SUP]For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.
[SUP]6 [/SUP]For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
[SUP]8 [/SUP]So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
[SUP]9 [/SUP]But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his(Romans 8:1-9).

The only thing we have to do is allow the Spirit to lead us and we are right with God,for only being led by the Spirit can cause you to be right with God.Repenting of our sins,and having them washed away,causes us to have the Spirit.

The thing with all the debating over once saved,always saved,or anything else,the only thing that will cause us to be saved is being led by the Spirit,which then we can love perfectly,which love is the fulfilling of the law.

So for people that believe once saved,always saved,and all the scriptures people use to suppoort it,or go against it,the only thing that would determine if once saved,always saved,is true,is if they are led of the Spirit,which you can tell whether they are led of the Spirit or not by their lifestyle.

The people that believe once saved,always saved,are they led of the Spirit,and if they are why do we observe personally that their lifestyle is not one that would be led of the Spirit,although I will not say all of them.

The Bible says love not the world,or the things in the world,if any person love the world,or the things in the world,the love of the Father is not in them,but you will observe that a lot of them do love the things in the world.

The Bible says,love works no ill towards their neighbor,therefore love is the fulfilling of the law,so nobody can deny that we must love,but the Bible says that love does not think an evil thought,let alone do the act,so why do we see them engaging in sin.

If being led of the Spirit is the only thing that causes us to be right with God,although we must repent first,then why do we see people that believe once saved,always saved,having a lifestyle that is not Spirit led,but I will not all of them,when only being led of the Spirit is the only way we are right with God.

If they engage in sin they are not led of the Spirit at that time,but if it is once saved,always saved,they should be in that position of being led of the Spirit at all times,so there would be a time they were not saved,by engaging in something that is not Spirit led,or will they say,in the long run before we die we will be in the Spirit.
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
#77
I see. I hadn't read the thread.
Altho I understand your point, I think it does the passage an injustice to use the word money. Money isn't something the bible looks on favorably, and an earnest deposit here clearly isn't money.
I understand that the Holy Spirit isn't money and I said as much here:

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/120721-absolutism-verb-tense-4.html#post2251767

My point, nay, PAUL'S POINT, is that in the same manner in which somebody desiring to purchase a house puts down a downpayment of "earnest money", God has similarly given us "the earnest" or the downpayment "of the Spirit". The purchase is not yet complete, however, and anybody who insists otherwise either has no idea what an "earnest" is or just willfully chooses to ignore the same. IOW, if the purchase truly was complete, then Paul would have never used the term "earnest" to describe it.
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
#78
I can just as easily use the same words to accurately describe your actions...wilfully ignoring verb tense, reading in things not there, bringing God and what he does down to a man's level, failing to consider that what God does it is FOREVER etc......so....you keep believing you can lose your salvation....I will keep believing in eternal security and God keeping his word while taking into account the verb tenses inspired by God which you seem to ignore because it contradicts your current belief...read post 66 and come on board with the truth friend! Humble yourself to the truth!
I have humbled myself to the truth as "the truth" is Jesus Christ and He definitely didn't believe in OSAS. I'll give you several examples of such in His Own words in a little while, but I've got to take care of a few things first. I'll be back later.
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
#79
Eph 2:8~~For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, the gift of God;

Eph 2:5~~2:5 even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved),


"have been saved"~~Is a periphrastic perfect tense.

It is composed of the perfect passive participle sozo(saved) and the present active indicative eimi(have been.)

The periphrasis consists of 2 verbal forms because Paul can't get all the details in in one verbal form. And it makes "saved" an intensive perfect.

Saved in the past(through faith), saved now and saved forever.

the periphrastic perfect used in vs 8 and vs 5 is one of the most forceful expressions in the Greek and offers no loop holes.

We are eternally secure.
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
#80
Well, since dcon and others insist that Jesus believes in and taught "once saved, always saved" or "eternal security", I'll cite some of His teachings for us to consider and then periodically list more if need be:

"And there went great multitudes with him: and he turned, and said unto them, If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple. For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it? Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him, Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish. Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand? Or else, while the other is yet a great way off, he sendeth an ambassage, and desireth conditions of peace. So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple. Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be seasoned? It is neither fit for the land, nor yet for the dunghill; but men cast it out. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." (Luke 14:25-35)

What "foundation" can men lay and begin to build upon other than the "foundation" of Christ? What did Jesus mean when He spoke of those who "began to build" upon this "foundation", but "were not able to finish"? What did Jesus mean about entering into a "war" without consulting first whether or not you would be able to endure the onslaught from the opposing kingdom if this "war" isn't the spiritual "war" that Christians enter into against Satan? When Jesus warned of those who would send out an "ambassador and desire conditions of peace" with their adversary, was He not referring to Christians who would get battle weary and drop out of the fight? What did Jesus mean when He spoke of "salt losing its savour". Who is "the salt of the earth" if not Christians? What happens to Christians who "lose their savour" or who lose their saltiness? Are they "once saved, always saved" or are they "not even fit for the dunghill" and are "cast out"? Who here has ears to hear what Jesus said and meant?

"Now the parable is this: The seed is the word of God. Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved. They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away. And that which fell among thorns are they, which, when they have heard, go forth, and are choked with cares and riches and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to perfection. But that on the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience." (Luke 8:11-15)

Who are these who "when they hear, receive the word with joy" and "which for a while believe and in time of temptation fall away"? Don't tell me...let me guess:

Those who never believed and those who never fell away, right?

Why don't you believe the words of Jesus? Are you wiser than Him? Mark said that these "endure but for a time" (Mark 4:17) and Jesus said that we need to endure unto the end to be saved (Matthew 10:22, 24:13).

What about those who "bring no fruit to perfection"? It sure sounds to me like the "fruit" was growing until something happened to it. Matthew said that "he becomes unfruitful" (Matthew 13:22). Can someone "become unfruitful" who wasn't "fruitful" to begin with? What happened to the one who "became unfruitful"? He was "choked with cares and riches and pleasures of this life". Can weeds "choke" that which wasn't there to begin with? Apparently, you and others would have us to believe that they can, but some of us simply aren't that gullible and our souls are way too valuable to us for us to dismiss the repeated warnings of Jesus and His Apostles.

"Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times? Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven. Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants. And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents. But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made. The servant therefore fell down, and worshipped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all. Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt. But the same servant went out, and found one of his fellowservants, which owed him an hundred pence: and he laid hands on him, and took him by the throat, saying, Pay me that thou owest. And his fellowservant fell down at his feet, and besought him, saying, Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all. And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he should pay the debt. So when his fellowservants saw what was done, they were very sorry, and came and told unto their lord all that was done. Then his lord, after that he had called him, said unto him, O thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all that debt, because thou desiredst me: Shouldest not thou also have had compassion on thy fellowservant, even as I had pity on thee? And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him. So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses." (Matthew 18:21-35)

Who was this "servant" who was released from an incredible debt that he could never pay his king when he cried out for mercy? Wasn't Jesus here speaking of Christians who are released from their incredible debt of sin? Of course, He was. Well, what happened to this "servant" when he refused to forgive a fellow servant? HE HAD HIS DEBT RESTORED TO HIM. Now, tell me...does that sound like "once saved, always saved" to you? For crying out loud, man, this "servant" was "delivered to the tormentors until he should pay off his debt". How was he to pay it? The Lord released him from it and then restored it to him again. How does this jive with your totally pulled out of context verse from Ecclesiastes? If what the Lord does is eternal in the manner in which you'd have us to believe, then why did He release this debt only to later restore it? You're at odds with Jesus Christ, friend, and that's not a good place to be.

"For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods. And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to every man according to his several ability; and straightway took his journey. Then he that had received the five talents went and traded with the same, and made them other five talents. And likewise he that had received two, he also gained other two. But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord's money. After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them. And so he that had received five talents came and brought other five talents, saying, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents: behold, I have gained beside them five talents more. His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord. He also that had received two talents came and said, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents: behold, I have gained two other talents beside them. His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord. Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed: And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine. His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." (Matthew 25:14-30)

Who were these "servants" unto whom the Lord gave "talents" which He expected them to trade with so that at His return He might receive back what He had given them with "usury" or with interest? Aren't they Christians who are supposed to be spreading the gospel that others might be saved so that Jesus truly can "reap where He hasn't sown and gather where He hasn't strawed"? IOW, aren't Christians supposed to be "sowing" and "strawing" or aren't they supposed to be "occupying until Jesus comes" as we read in Luke's account (Luke 19:13)? What happened to "the unprofitable servant"? Was he "once saved, always saved" as you'd have us to believe? Did he retain that which the Lord had originally given Him because, according to your butchering of the Ecclesiastes passage, everything that the Lord does is eternal? Friend, HIS TALENT WAS TAKEN FROM HIM AND HE WAS CAST INTO OUTER DARKNESS WHERE THERE SHALL BE WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH. If that sounds like "always saved" to you, then you need a lot of help.

Well, that's just an introduction. Let's see who wants to mess with Jesus' words unto their own possible/probable destruction and the possible/probable destruction of those foolish enough to follow them and let's see who wants to believe what Jesus taught and teach it to others as well. I know which side I'm on and I'm not budging from it. Jesus neither believes in nor did He teach "once saved, always saved". In fact, He believes in and taught the exact opposite and, again, the above is only an introduction.