Replacement/Supersessionism Theology,Why it Matters

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come.
For which hope's sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews.

-seems Pauls hope was in the promises given to [the twelve tribes of Israel].
LOL but only in the terms in which Paul would interpret them. He saw Christ as the fulfilment of the promises to Israel.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
64
LOL but only in the terms in which Paul would interpret them. He saw Christ as the fulfilment of the promises to Israel.
That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom,

and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.



And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration

when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones,

judging the twelve tribes of Israel.




And Elijah took twelve stones, according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Jacob,
unto whom the word of the Lord came, saying, Israel shall be thy name:



The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named on them,
and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude
in the midst of the earth.
 
Last edited:
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Oooh, so plan A was not perfect and God needed plan B. The perfect non-changing God needed plan B?

This makes perfect sense thank you for enlightening me. I will accept it because James57 said so... and if God ask me about it I will tell him James57 made me do it :)
Please calm down the sarcasm.This is a difficult subject already.I dont want nasty arguments.Please respect each other.Thanks
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
the fact there is a remnant proves God is still keeping his promise to Israel. For he has not let them die as a nation, but promised to never let them die.

what reason is there to be a remnant, if Gods dealing with the nation of Israel is done. Is there a remnant of any other nation on earth God promised things to?? why not??
Great point!!!!!
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest


The Christian church did not 'replace' Israel. IT IS Israel. Jesus founded the Messianic congregation on Peter's statement concerning Him. Jesus initially 'built His congregation' among the Jews, and a large minority (the believing remnant that was the true Israel - Rom 11.1 ff)) of Jews turned to Him and became believers in the Messiah. So Judaism was divided into two parts. Believing Israel and unbelieving, rejected, cut off Jews. Which was the true Israel? Unquestionably the answer is, 'believing Israel. They were the true olive tree of Israel.

When Gentiles began to become part of that congregation as proselytes they BECAME ISRAEL (as had always happened). Thus the believers in the Messiah were the true Israel and the same is true today.

The nation of Israel may claim to be Israel but it is NOT Biblical Israel. It can become so by believing in Jesus as the Messiah and becoming members of the church. Until then it is NOT Israel (Rom 9.6). The true Israel is still being blessed by God and it is represented by those who truly belong to the Messiah.

To suggest that this teaching is responsible for Jewish persecution is illogical. They are not persecuted by true Christians.

Of course the Old Covenant has been replaced by the new. That was the purpose of the new covenant. The old was done away that the new might come (Heb 8.7, 13). Unbelieving Israel has no claims on God.


Well Im sorry,I dont agree with this but I do agree with you here,that true Christians do not and have not persecuted Israel.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
GOD's first promise of the land of Canaan to the messiah was in Shechem.

And the LORD appeared unto Abram, and said, I will give this land to your seed : and there he built an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him. Genesis 12:7

We know this refers to Christ because Paul said the promises (not just a promise) were made to Abraham and Christ.

Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, who is Christ. Galatians 3:16

This is confirmed by the fact that when GOD later made a blood covenant with Abram to give him the assurance that he would receive the land, GOD said he would give the land, not to Abram, but to his seed.
And he said unto him, I am the LORD that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it. And he said, Lord GOD, whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it? Genesis 15:7-8

In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: Genesis 15:18

Abram knew this referred to the messiah. A covenant to give the land to Abram's descendents would have provided him with absolutely no assurance, because he could never receive anything from those who would die like he would. But Abram's faith in the messiah assured him that he would receive the land with the messiah in the resurrection.

bro, this line of reasoning is invalid. And I am done trying to discuss this with you. You are the only person I can remember who ever used this argument (ad I have studied all forms of end time and prophetic believes extensively for many decades. and again, I do not know who taught you this or if you came up with it on your own. But it is not even sensical when taken with all of prophesy.


Gal 3 was written to jews who thought they were saved by law and because they were jews. And they thought every gentile had to be forced to follow jewish law if they wanted to be saved.

They mistranslated the part of the covenant of Abraham, which said in you (your seed) shall ALL THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD BE BLESSED.

That is the context of gal 3. Not a non salvic promise of land given to a nation of people..

so please stop using it. I will not discuss it anymore.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
If you learned to understand Scripture instead of fitting it into your pretrib tightcoat you would know that in Rom 9-11 Paul deals with two Israels, rejected Israel and the election of Israel. The election of Israel will be saved along with the 'fullness of the Gentiles'. Together they form the 'all Israel' which will be saved. Without the fullness of the Gentiles 'all Israel' could not be saved.
if you would open your mind, instead of being stained by your anti-jewish retoric.

You would understand.. Rom 9 is speaking against jews being saved simply because they are jews. That there is no jew or gentile. but we are all one under Christ. So god did not fail in what he said he would do. It happened exactly as he promised, Paul even used OT prophesy to prove that the gentile would come into being children of God. and that Israel would stumble and fall.

Rom 11 on the other hand, States quite clearly. Yet God is not done with Israel.

1. There is a remnant still
2. They are blinded in part
3. Gentiles now have the reigns of control of Gods word and gospel. it was taken away form the jews because they failed
4. Gentiles will have this for a time predetermined by God (until their time is completed)
5. At that time, Israel will repent, be saved, and be restored to their promised place as Gods chosen people living in their land.
6. Until that time, Israel is my enemy concerning the gospel. But to be loved because Gods promises are irrevocable.

So you tell me. How can they be my enemy and loved at the same time, if God is talking about spiritual Israel and not natural Israel.

don't tell me to open my eyes when your eyes are clouded over, You can;t see if my eyes are open or not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
K

kaylagrl

Guest
which demonstrates that the 'church' was called that because it was the continuation of the true Israel.

.


And God is our king today, and we are the true Israel.



and who are now His peculiar people? The church - 1 Pet 2.9,



No! This is false doctrine .The church has not replaced Israel. It funny how Israel gets to keep all the curses while this "spiritual Israel" keeps all the blessings. Funny how that is.
 
Oct 21, 2015
2,420
12
0
No! This is false doctrine .The church has not replaced Israel. It funny how Israel gets to keep all the curses while this "spiritual Israel" keeps all the blessings. Funny how that is.
I honestly believe it is being led of the academic mind of man(theologians and scholars) rather than being led of the Holy Spirit to accept what is plainly written
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113

bro, this line of reasoning is invalid. And I am done trying to discuss this with you. You are the only person I can remember who ever used this argument (ad I have studied all forms of end time and prophetic believes extensively for many decades. and again, I do not know who taught you this or if you came up with it on your own. But it is not even sensical when taken with all of prophesy....

so please stop using it. I will not discuss it anymore.
This is so sad when believers who claim to believe what the bible says, ignore it when it witnesses against what they believe. And whose minds go blank when confronted with scripture that they can't understand within their paradigm, and then call that faith.

The fact is GOD made a covenant with Abram to give the land to Christ. That is the only credible explanation within the context of Genesis 15 in which GOD gives to Abram the surety that he asked for.

How would a covenant with Abram to give the land to Abram's descendents been surety that Abram himself would receive the land? It wouldn't. Thus your interpretation falls apart.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I honestly believe it is being led of the academic mind of man(theologians and scholars) rather than being led of the Holy Spirit to accept what is plainly written
when one has to make an allegory, or spiritualise prophesy to make it come true, in the face of God specifically stating that if a prophet speaks a word which does not come to happen, it is not of God. then you know it is of God and not of men.

The roman church started doing this when they changed from a literal interpretation, to an allegorical interpretation of most of Gods word. This doctrine is just one of the casualties.

Of course she (the roman church) hated Israel. How could those who killed Christ ever be given promises again, God must be done wiht them, And we will take it oourself.. (it is all pride)
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
4,124
1,033
113
62
Ok, where in the bible did God promise a plot of land to Israel in the middle east?

Well you can read this from Genesis on and can follow the whole OT. You can read also special which tribe has got which size of land. God gave a descripton from the bordermark. Genesis 15, 1-21; Exodus 34, 10-11; Numbers 13,2; Numbers 32-36; Deuteronium 3,12ff; the Book Josua f.e. Today Israel has not the expandure as God has promised. But it will come, according what God has promised to his own choosen folk. To deny that God has choosen Abraham, Jacob and Issak and has given them the land which we calling Israel, is not knowing about gods plan and love with us all. (sorry for my bad english)
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,783
3,684
113
The times of the nations will last until the lord returns. Not a believer in your eschatalogical view of Jacob's trouble.
Right, and the Lord returns at the end of Jacob's Trouble...the Great Tribulation.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This is so sad when believers who claim to believe what the bible says, ignore it when it witnesses against what they believe. And whose minds go blank when confronted with scripture that they can't understand within their paradigm, and then call that faith.

yes it is sad, when you take the literal promises of God. which is stated and restated all throughout the OT. And twist it to mean something else based on a few verses in one book in the NT.

Thats called using your belief to interpret the word. and not the word to interpret your belief.


The fact is GOD made a covenant with Abram to give the land to Christ.

Thats your belief, and your allowed to have it. But it is not supported by scripture. You do not make a doctrine based on a few verses, you make a doctrine based on the whole of scripture.


That is the only credible explanation within the context of Genesis 15 in which GOD gives to Abram the surety that he asked for.

How would a covenant with Abram to give the land to Abram's descendents been surety that Abram himself would receive the land? It wouldn't. Thus your interpretation falls apart.
No. your asking the wrong question.

Why would God say he gave to all his seed as an eternal inheritance. And renew his promise to two of his sons, Then claim in many prophesies he will never forget his people. he will always keep a remnant, Even if they sin and he has to remove them, if they repent he will remember his promise and restore them.

Why would he say he would always remember his covenant to abraham issac and jacb, and paul even mention it in the future tense. If it ws all given to Christ.

and again, Why would Christ give himself a land he already owns, He owns the world. He has no need of one small peace of land.


again, your sarcasm does not grant you much place. when almost every sarcastic argument you make can be made against yourself. You have been told this over an dover, but you do not seem to get it. why?? I have no idea. but I pray you get it one day.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Israel isn't the tree. Israel are the natural branches.
I missed that, thank you.

Christ is the tree, Isreal are natural branches, Gentiles are un-natural branches..
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,783
3,684
113
If Jews and gentiles are one new man, and that man is not Israel, then that sounds like replacement theology in which the Jews are no longer Israel.
Scripture states the Church is one new man made up of both Jew and Gentile.
How can it be Israel when it is new?

Ephesians 2:14-16 KJVS
[14] For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us ; [15] Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; [16] And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

...something new called the Church, His Body.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I don't believe your eschatology. Jacob's trouble was long ago.
How? when WW1 and WW2 were far more great a tribulation that anything which happened in Jesus day or before it?

Jeremiah 30:7
Alas! For that day is great, So that none is like it; And it is the time of Jacob’s trouble, But he shall be saved out of it.

if WW1 and WW2 was far greater than any time before it, Then how could it have already occured?

and oh by the way, the time of jacobs trouble was used to cause isreal to repent, and it says they will repent. So since Israel has never repented, how could it have been fulfilled?

jeremiah 30:
‘For it shall come to pass in that day,’
Says the Lord of hosts,
That I will break his yoke from your neck,
And will burst your bonds;
Foreigners shall no more enslave them.
[SUP]9 [/SUP]But they shall serve the Lord their God,
And David their king,
Whom I will raise up for them.


2 strikes against this faulty view, Isreal has been enslaved since Syria first captured the nnorthern kingdom. they have never been free as a nation since.