The "Bushido8000 v.s Utah v.s GodIsSalvation" Thread

  • Thread starter Siberian_Khatru
  • Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#81
The conservative ideology is based on slavery to the Party, the State, and Doctrines of the Status Quo. It promises them freedom but is enslaved to corruption.

Only God directs the destiny of the king, his will triumphs over all wills.
Well, I'm happy you've figured out what our ideology was based on. I was going to go back and check on Russell Kirk, but I suppose this will have to do.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#82
Most liberals deny they are liberals, then proceed
to prove otherwise, usually by twisting the truth,
and then using what they've bent to bolster
their own warped view of reality.

I can still hear your Pres. B.O. saying, 'You didn't build that',
much like what was posted above.

Frat boys, keggers, a king that just wants
a 'nice' sit-down dinner? Don't know what kind of
fantasy world some ppl are living in, but there are
dirtbags chopping innocent ppl's heads off...

These are real ppl, and no playtime storybook king singing
Kum-by-yah, stomping his feet, and crying,
'Why can't we all just get along', is gonna stop real evil.
Neither will liberal twisting of the truth.

The above statement, 'THE conservatives, etc., ...'
was a typical liberal twist by the poster.
Read again...
'MANY conservatives are christians' and
'Most christians...vote/lean conservative'
were the statements, and they are TRUE.

And you won't find a whole lot of Pharisee-ism(?sorry?)
in the military, or by conservative christians, especially
when compared to their liberal counterparts,
not alot of 'saying they're religious' among them.

And no need to SAY it, when so many LIVE it out,
volunteering and risking the ultimate sacrifice
defending freedom, (even the freedom of liberal posters)
and MANY...I'll even say Most,
conservatives and christians support them.

(And tho I was not a big fan of the politics of,
say, MittRomney or John McCain's, those men
have more guts in their little fingers, than most liberals
have in their whole bodies, including the ones that
mock them on christian chat sites, and way more than
myself included, I confess.)

BUT...the policies of liberals, and their supporters,
are getting people, Real people, killed.

Please.....wake up.
You gotta be joking. The policies of the conservatives are getting people killed. Hello, Iraq War ring a bell? The conservatives are Pharisees indeed. The military all ready persecutes Christians. The conservatives send people to die in vain in their wars based on a lie of freedom. They promise them freedom but are totally corrupted! What freedoms did we gain from these wars that the rightists and leftists both sent my people to die in vain for? Typical conservative lies, say they have to make war for freedom then say they gotta take away freedoms because of the war. Anyone with common sense that says that's just a tad bit absurd they label as a liberal.
 
S

sydlit

Guest
#83
the leader of america stood in front of thousands of people (and on tv), read from a bible, mocked it as none sense.
freedom? we have no free press any more, we are forced against our will to buy insurance we dont want or need, 50 cameras at every intersection, universities that care more about profit and nothing about knowledge, doctors that are nothing more than pill pushers, cops going into jr high schools and assaulting kids and every year the working man has to work that much harder for less money he did the year before while the company he works for proudly announces record profits for the year.
We get that you hate America, SO LEAVE.
 
S

sydlit

Guest
#84
Lol that's not a fix, that's how we got into a lot of these problems to begin with. Lol typical conservative absurdity.


Conservative Logic:

Wage issues = vote for the do-nothing party and save up money for a gun
Police Malconduct = vote for the do-nothing party and get a gun
Medical Corruption = vote for the do-nothing party and get a gun
Education = vote for the do-nothing party and take your gun to school
Islam = vote for the do-nothing party and give muslims guns
Abortion = vote for the do-nothing party and give abortion doctors guns
Welfare = take it away and give 'em a gun.
We get it...you hate America...so LEAVE!
 
J

jaybird88

Guest
#85
We get that you hate America, SO LEAVE.
i dont hate america, i hate what it has become. i listed examples of what i base this on. i refuse to turn a blind eye to whats going on and crawl inside a little box and tell myself all is well. maybe i can get some drugs and dumb myself down.

ignorance is bliss . . .
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#86
We get that you hate America, SO LEAVE.
Point out how the conservatives have wrecked the house, they tell you to leave your own house! This is what happens when we let conservative frat boys and liberal hipsters run our country. They wreck the house then they start trying to persecute each other.

No one is getting kicked out, we're in this together.
 
J

jaybird88

Guest
#87
Point out how the conservatives have wrecked the house, they tell you to leave your own house! This is what happens when we let conservative frat boys and liberal hipsters run our country. They wreck the house then they start trying to persecute each other.

No one is getting kicked out, we're in this together.
lol frat boys and hipsters, if only i were so cool.
 
J

jaybird88

Guest
#89
Don't let anyone tell you you're not cool jaybird, you're awesome bro.
thanks brother but dont tell my kids, they think im old and lame but we have lots of fun with it lol.
 
S

sydlit

Guest
#90
The conservative ideology is based on slavery to the Party, the State, and Doctrines of the Status Quo. It promises them freedom but is enslaved to corruption.

Only God directs the destiny of the king, his will triumphs over all wills.
For somebody who claims to not be a liberal,
you sure talk alot of liberal fluff.
Conservatives don't want to wage war,
Conservatives want to win war.

Liberals want to sit on their laptops
and reap the rewards that others sacrifice
to win for them, spewing your liberal fluff
against the very ones that would save the same
sorry liberal soft ascot you use to sit on your laptop.

Your imaginary, hollywood liberal movies about
your toy kings and your dolly costumes have
caused your mind to blend the real world with
adolescent fantasy, and you need to stop,
or seriously...LEAVE AMERICA, before your
liberalism causes the erosion of what freedoms
we still have, (no thanks to you) and it becomes
Illegal to go.
But since you like your laptop so much,
how about using it to check out some sites like,
well, how about military aircraft sites...check out
some F-16's, FA-18's, or the Stealth or the Raptor,
check out what these machines are for, why we have
them, and get to know the men who pilot them.
Do you think you know Christians? Do you think
you know faithful men? You may be quite surprised
who the ppl are that you so readily disparage while
sitting on the comfort of your keyboard.

Or check out some sites dedicated to Medal of Honor
recipients, see if they have any conservative vs liberal views.

Same with wounded warriors of pennsylvania, local former
vets and National Guard who VOLUNTEER
their time and money helping other
soldiers and their families in wonderful ways,
many of whom are struggling because of your
liberal policies that hang our troops out to dry,
rather than engage and defeat evil and the enemy
swiftly and soundly, the way True conservatives
want, which, btw, would bring a quicker end to war
and actually SAVE lives, unlike you liberals, who think
It's all just another playstation fantasy role-playing game,
and causing countless more lives to be lost.

Find out what true conservatives actually believe,
and then tell them some of your liberal fluff,
see how it flies among genuine, not hollywood, heroes.

Someone else said it well, liberalism is not just a
mental disorder...it's a Dangerous mental disorder.
I pray, honestly, because I don't want to be your enemy,
and I want to believe your heart wants to be in the right place.

But your head is not anywhere near where it should be,
and I pray you have a change in view, for Jesus our Saviour,
and for America, the land He chose to do more to spread
His gospel and freedom from, than anywhere else, mostly
through the efforts of freedom-loving, America-supporting,
Christian conservatives, not anti-American, anti-christ liberals.
 
S

sydlit

Guest
#92
Reading the Bible, especially the Gospels, is why I gave up on conservatism.
Oh my gosh my friend, how is that possible?! Now I'm thinking your just playing devil's advocate, and pulling our conservative leg. If so, you're doing an excellent job, lol. But if you're seriously, man, I just don't get it. Maybe you and I have completely diff meanings of the word?! How about a couple of topics to help decide...
Abortion, sanctity of life, :
Mostly the conservative view is pro-life, life begins at conception,
and should be protected.
Mostly the liberal view is pro-abortion, we don't know when life begins,
and it's not that important to protect.
Which view do you see Jesus/the bible on?
Which view do you see yourself on?

Homosexual, ordained to preach/teach from pulpit, :
Mostly, conservative view is no, liberal is yes.
Which view does Jesus/bible take? Or you?

Homosexual marriage:
Conservative no. Liberal yes.
What about Jesus/bible? Or you?

How can you take the liberal position and still side with Jesus/bible?
I just don't get it, GiS. Please clarify...
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,299
15
0
#93
Lol oh the irony, the anarchist leftists have to wait on either the conservative fascist slaves or the authoritarian kings to start the political discourse lol.

No surprise that the rightist are all ready here to sycophantically vote for the conservatives before even a word is said. So I suppose the right kingly one has to start the show because he is compelled not to stop his ears at a challenge or to the concerns of the people. Let's start of with a smooth transition because kings hate sudden change. I think I'll open by showing my view on the three prevalent political ideologies, Leftism, Rightism, Monarchy. Nothing personal of course, I like ya'll, I see this not so much as a personal debate between me, sir Bushido, and sir Utah, but rather between three ideas.

Your last comment to me in the other thread is indeed a good opening for an introductory of my view on the positions of Leftism, Rightism, and Monarchism.



Lol this is the hilarious paradox of the leftist. I have many friends of my different sorts growing up all whom I of course love being my literal neighbors even. Some of my best friends were hardcore leftists even punk rock anarchists. I've heard over many years and debated about anarchism, it is not a new ideology to me. Basically like stereotypical leftists they claim it's different than anarchy because they added an -ism to it. Lol always so PC them leftists are. They claim anarchy isn't about lawlessness, but claim that it's about self-governance, especially for the lower classes. Their argument is then basically for communism or democracy, depending whether the particular leftists is a collectivist or an individualist. However both democracy and communism would be a form of government. Therefore they have to resort back to anarchy, which is total lawlessness, and anarchy is never to be desired. There is no governance without rules. The problem of the rightist is the hilarious parody of the leftist because they think there can be no rules without a government, usually of the fascist sort.

The problems of rightists and leftists are obvious to the king, because they are his people. Yet kings got their own problems too, mostly that wearisome battle between good and evil. All government is based off of Divine Right. The good king always has to appeal to a higher authority ultimately, precept upon precept and line upon line. In this way the king is somewhat like the rightist. The difference is the rightists' highest authority is some worthless doctrine, some worthless piece of paper like the US Constitution, or some worthlessly dead heretics and pagans. In this way kings are almost like leftists by not respecting those false authorities, except the leftist has no authority. The authority the leftist tries to appeal to is self; self-governance, self-made rules, etc. When you're at the point of making up your own rules you're only a stones throw away from letting the same heretics and pagans the conservatives venerate run amok on us because they don't recognize your self-made rules, they recognize someone else's self-made rules.

The law of the only true God is to love God and your neighbor. A king's political burden is therefore three-fold; to stop the leftists from letting anarchy and lawlessness destroy the people, to stop the conservative fascists from hijacking the government or turning into a mindless lynch mob, and the main threat to the good king is standing to the contest with his rival kings that seek to dominate his people and the evil spiritual powers and religions against God.

The king's greatest weakness is The People. The People can never be trusted to rule themselves lest they end up like Israel in the wilderness turning back to the enslavement of a foreign king like Pharoah and his dirty worthless foreign gods. The government can also not be fully trusted because they often have not mercy towards the people like when Joab killed Absalom even though David expressly commanded he spare his life. The battle between good kings and evil kings is also shown in the dynamic of The People. Such as with King Sennacherib's taunts and flatteries trying to sway the people against God and Hezekiah on the wall by the voice of Rabshakeh and King Hezekiah's plea to the Lord alone for defense, which God indeed did hearken to and grant and saved both the people and the government and the king, praise to Jesus.
Hey you! We can't talk to the spectators! it's not part of the game! Normally, if you were conservative, I would just declare me winner by default since you broke the rules and Utah never showed....but....I understand the difficulty in not responding to how hilarious this has become and now recognize the true legitimacy of a Monarchy (while, of course, rejecting the silly idea of the Conservative Statist). Whatever, Team Level-Headed (Bushido/GIS) vs. the Not-Muslim-But-Just-As-Radicalized Squad?

11254321_10153322012290197_4719886361604097704_n.jpg

EDIT: Sorry I completely forgot to respond to your post. I'll do that right now
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#94
Oh my gosh my friend, how is that possible?! Now I'm thinking your just playing devil's advocate, and pulling our conservative leg. If so, you're doing an excellent job, lol. But if you're seriously, man, I just don't get it. Maybe you and I have completely diff meanings of the word?! How about a couple of topics to help decide...
Abortion, sanctity of life, :
Mostly the conservative view is pro-life, life begins at conception,
and should be protected.
Mostly the liberal view is pro-abortion, we don't know when life begins,
and it's not that important to protect.
Which view do you see Jesus/the bible on?
Which view do you see yourself on?

Homosexual, ordained to preach/teach from pulpit, :
Mostly, conservative view is no, liberal is yes.
Which view does Jesus/bible take? Or you?

Homosexual marriage:
Conservative no. Liberal yes.
What about Jesus/bible? Or you?

How can you take the liberal position and still side with Jesus/bible?
I just don't get it, GiS. Please clarify...
Ain't pulling your leg. Heck, most of what Mitspa says I've said when I was a pre-teen. The Bible testifies quite a bit against the conservative warmongers, nationalists, and oppressors of the poor. Bluntly, they are the Pharisees. Conservatives hold to traditions and the status quo. That's the Pharisees dude. Even one of the definitions of conservative is literally "of, relating to, or practicing conservative Judaism" That's literally the Pharisees. Conservative | Definition of conservative by Merriam-Webster

I'll say it one last time. I am not a leftist, if you want to debate a leftist, you wait for Sir Bushido to return.

On the issues you bring up:

Abortion - Abortion is evil, the leftists erred greatly doing this thing and the conservatives let it happen. I mean for real, you got Ben Carson whose experimented on aborted fetuses running in the GOP primary. The conservatives all talk about getting rid of abortion, but when they're given the authority to do it, they never do it. That US Constitution that the conservatives venerate allowed abortion to be legalized. If you believe in the Constitution then you have to allow abortion. I don't have to respect the Constitution though and I don't have to respect abortion. Abortion is indeed though moreso the fault of the leftists who shield it all the time and try to spread it, and a big reason I'll never be a leftist. I don't hate abortion though because some conservative told me to. I hate abortion because I know real people that have really had an abortion and how they were pressured into it and beguiled and the harm it's done to them. You can't even call abortion supporters liberals because of it. Death and infertility is the opposite of the meaning of the word liberal. The leftists are a parody of liberalism, just like the rightists are a parody of conservatism by holding to the vain traditions of one of the most leftist doctrines of all time, the US Constitution.

In the Bible though you should read how many of the saints wish they died in the womb. You should read how beloved Job wished he was never born. I've wished the same before also. Doesn't condone abortion, but it's some good food for thought.

On homosexuality; again the conservatives are just as guilty. Ain't John Roberts supposed be a conservative? Sure the leftist greatly disappoint me over this, especially with how they promote this filth to children. Again your beloved US Constitution is the reason this crap happens. The Bible is against homosexuality, and for good reason too, it's sexual abuse.

As for marriage, homosexuals can't get married, they don't got the parts for it. They can only abuse each other. Marriage isn't a ring and a ritual. Nor is marriage defined by the State as the conservatives think it is. Only when the two become one are they married and only a man and a woman got the parts for that. You can consider 1 Corinthians 6:16. While we're on the marriage stuff, what's up with all the conservatives divorcing and remarrying or outright telling people to do such? That's crap I expect from the leftists, but lo and behold the rightists are doing it too. Even their churches of stone condoning it! Pretty sure that ain't cool by the Bible either.

As for just general liberals. The leftists ain't liberals. The leftists aren't better than the rightists nor are the rightists better than the leftists, heck they vote for the same wars and the same oppressions. A true liberal wants bounty, prosperity, and generosity. You should ponder these words of Isaiah for a bit and gain some small understanding about kings and liberals.

Isaiah 32:1-8

1 Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness, and princes shall rule in judgment.
[SUP]2 [/SUP]And a man shall be as an hiding place from the wind, and a covert from the tempest; as rivers of water in a dry place, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land.
[SUP]3 [/SUP]And the eyes of them that see shall not be dim, and the ears of them that hear shall hearken.
[SUP]4 [/SUP]The heart also of the rash shall understand knowledge, and the tongue of the stammerers shall be ready to speak plainly.
[SUP]5 [/SUP]The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful.
[SUP]6 [/SUP]For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the Lord, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail.
[SUP]7 [/SUP]The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right.
[SUP]8 [/SUP]But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,299
15
0
#95
Reading the Bible, especially the Gospels, is why I gave up on conservatism.
^THIS! And why I became an Anarchist. Even though I'm an Anarcho-Capitalist I would EASILY take Anarcho-Communism over a Statist society.

Lol oh the irony, the anarchist leftists have to wait on either the conservative fascist slaves or the authoritarian kings to start the political discourse lol.

No surprise that the rightist are all ready here to sycophantically vote for the conservatives before even a word is said. So I suppose the right kingly one has to start the show because he is compelled not to stop his ears at a challenge or to the concerns of the people. Let's start of with a smooth transition because kings hate sudden change. I think I'll open by showing my view on the three prevalent political ideologies, Leftism, Rightism, Monarchy. Nothing personal of course, I like ya'll, I see this not so much as a personal debate between me, sir Bushido, and sir Utah, but rather between three ideas.

Your last comment to me in the other thread is indeed a good opening for an introductory of my view on the positions of Leftism, Rightism, and Monarchism.



Lol this is the hilarious paradox of the leftist. I have many friends of my different sorts growing up all whom I of course love being my literal neighbors even. Some of my best friends were hardcore leftists even punk rock anarchists. I've heard over many years and debated about anarchism, it is not a new ideology to me. Basically like stereotypical leftists they claim it's different than anarchy because they added an -ism to it. Lol always so PC them leftists are. They claim anarchy isn't about lawlessness, but claim that it's about self-governance, especially for the lower classes. Their argument is then basically for communism or democracy, depending whether the particular leftists is a collectivist or an individualist. However both democracy and communism would be a form of government. Therefore they have to resort back to anarchy, which is total lawlessness, and anarchy is never to be desired. There is no governance without rules. The problem of the rightist is the hilarious parody of the leftist because they think there can be no rules without a government, usually of the fascist sort.
To this, I would say we have a different definition on what a Government is. A society's structure is not the same as its government. A government is a ruling body to enforce a society's structure over a population. The main society structures that fall under Anarchy are usually Communism or Capitalism, there can never be democracy as no rules affecting a human being who isn't affecting another human being can be given. This means that everybody has the capability to own a gun so crimes would actually be much harder to commit (for example, imagine trying to rob a police station, now expand that type of force to the rest of the world). There might be some chaos at first, but groups of people tend to have a natural way of setting up society structures. There's also the idea of Agorism if one is REALLY worried about crime in an anarchist society

I developed most of my Anarchist ideals while living in Alaska. In Alaska, everyone REALLY DOES own a gun and as much as America would like to claim Alaska under its governing body, there's 0 enforcement. police were rarely ever seen my town (you have 5 cops patrolling a 200-500 mile stretch). If 911 was called for any kind of law enforcement problem, nobody was coming. Alaskans have a pretty delicate way of handling their own problems without law enforcement :).



The problems of rightists and leftists are obvious to the king, because they are his people. Yet kings got their own problems too, mostly that wearisome battle between good and evil. All government is based off of Divine Right. The good king always has to appeal to a higher authority ultimately, precept upon precept and line upon line. In this way the king is somewhat like the rightist. The difference is the rightists' highest authority is some worthless doctrine, some worthless piece of paper like the US Constitution, or some worthlessly dead heretics and pagans. In this way kings are almost like leftists by not respecting those false authorities, except the leftist has no authority. The authority the leftist tries to appeal to is self; self-governance, self-made rules, etc. When you're at the point of making up your own rules you're only a stones throw away from letting the same heretics and pagans the conservatives venerate run amok on us because they don't recognize your self-made rules, they recognize someone else's self-made rules.

The law of the only true God is to love God and your neighbor. A king's political burden is therefore three-fold; to stop the leftists from letting anarchy and lawlessness destroy the people, to stop the conservative fascists from hijacking the government or turning into a mindless lynch mob, and the main threat to the good king is standing to the contest with his rival kings that seek to dominate his people and the evil spiritual powers and religions against God.

The king's greatest weakness is The People. The People can never be trusted to rule themselves lest they end up like Israel in the wilderness turning back to the enslavement of a foreign king like Pharoah and his dirty worthless foreign gods. The government can also not be fully trusted because they often have not mercy towards the people like when Joab killed Absalom even though David expressly commanded he spare his life. The battle between good kings and evil kings is also shown in the dynamic of The People. Such as with King Sennacherib's taunts and flatteries trying to sway the people against God and Hezekiah on the wall by the voice of Rabshakeh and King Hezekiah's plea to the Lord alone for defense, which God indeed did hearken to and grant and saved both the people and the government and the king, praise to Jesus.
While I would say that modeling a frame of government based on what can be found in the Bible would initially be a good idea, history seems to prove otherwise to me.

When you have all of your trust in Government (Marxists, take note), the government will always end up corrupt (if it survives that long) but still powerful enough to enforce their corrupt ways (like Germany was and America currently is). A monarchy becomes even more dangerous because you only have one man to corrupt. Being of Scottish descent, I'm ESPECIALLY not fond of earthly kings lol.

Anarchy would have to be a common ideal for it to work, which it is not and probably never will be unfortunately as groups of people (even in the Bible) seem to feel a want to be ruled and dominated by other people. Example: Somalia

Lastly, keep in mind that I'm not saying an Anarchist society would be sunshine and rainbows out the gate. A free society isn't the same thing as a civilized society.
 
Last edited:
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#96
Hey you! We can't talk to the spectators! it's not part of the game! Normally, if you were conservative, I would just declare me winner by default since you broke the rules and Utah never showed....but....I understand the difficulty in not responding to how hilarious this has become and now recognize the true legitimacy of a Monarchy (while, of course, rejecting the silly idea of the Conservative Statist). Whatever, Team Level-Headed (Bushido/GIS) vs. the Not-Muslim-But-Just-As-Radicalized Squad?

View attachment 141206

EDIT: Sorry I completely forgot to respond to your post. I'll do that right now
Lol I never agreed to your self-made anarchist rules though and Siberian didn't set the rule saying no talking to the peanuts. Lol I said I'd be willing to take on 80 by myself if need be lol. Way I see it, game is still on, but I mean, if you want to concede that's always fine by me. Don't look at it as losing either. Why be a slave to leftism or anarchy anymore than conservatism and statism when you can be a king according to the Bible thanks to Jesus? (Revelation 5)
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,299
15
0
#97
Lol I never agreed to your self-made anarchist rules though and Siberian didn't set the rule saying no talking to the peanuts. Lol I said I'd be willing to take on 80 by myself if need be lol. Way I see it, game is still on, but I mean, if you want to concede that's always fine by me. Don't look at it as losing either. Why be a slave to leftism or anarchy anymore than conservatism and statism when you can be a king according to the Bible thanks to Jesus? (Revelation 5)
But being a king isn't the same thing as being ruled over by an earthly one

12299117_544287065720196_3088113007095590232_n.jpg
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,299
15
0
#98
Oh my gosh my friend, how is that possible?! Now I'm thinking your just playing devil's advocate, and pulling our conservative leg. If so, you're doing an excellent job, lol. But if you're seriously, man, I just don't get it. Maybe you and I have completely diff meanings of the word?! How about a couple of topics to help decide...
Abortion, sanctity of life, :
Mostly the conservative view is pro-life, life begins at conception,
and should be protected.
Mostly the liberal view is pro-abortion, we don't know when life begins,
and it's not that important to protect.
Which view do you see Jesus/the bible on?
Which view do you see yourself on?
I would see Jesus with the Anarchist's view, condemning the acts but not bombing the clinic
I would see myself with an Anarchist's view, condemning the acts but not bombing the clinic.

Homosexual, ordained to preach/teach from pulpit, :
Mostly, conservative view is no, liberal is yes.
Which view does Jesus/bible take? Or you?
I would say Jesus would have an Anarchist's view. Condemning the act but not stoning the preacher.
I would say I would have an Anarchist's view. Condemning the act but not stoning the preacher.

Homosexual marriage:
Conservative no. Liberal yes.
What about Jesus/bible? Or you?
I think you get the pattern.

How can you take the liberal position and still side with Jesus/bible?
I just don't get it, GiS. Please clarify...
Because just as much as Jesus wouldn't be ok with killing unborn babies, He wouldn't be ok with the conservative right not batting an eye when the US bombs a hospital full of sick people but cries like babies a couple weeks later when some people get killed by Muslims in Paris.

Because just as much as Jesus wouldn't be ok with gays getting married, He probably wouldn't be ok with Conservatives rejecting child refugees from Syria because they are afraid of terrorists getting in. Even though conservatives want to have guns, they seem to not believe in using them....odd.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#99
But being a king isn't the same thing as being ruled over by an earthly one

View attachment 141209
Lol a king ain't ruled over by an earthly king though, only by the King of Kings. Sure the world will still persecute us, but that's to be expected. The police is a good example. Do the police rule over us or do we rule over them? If he stops me is he persecuting me like a Nazi, or is he simply doing the job I commissioned him to do?

I liked your lengthier post, much disagreement but you do bring some interesting points, and I will have fun with it, but I will have to get to that later, stayed up way too late lol.
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,299
15
0
Quote "although it was a good thing that Hitler and the Japanese were taken down"

Ya well there is that. smh Ask a Jew who was liberated by the Brits from concentration camps if it had to do with freedom.
We didn't know about any concentration camps until we were knee deep in the war already. That's like going to war with Australia for 4 years and finding out that they've been murdering gay people for the last 9 years....after we turned away gay Australian refugees...because thats what WE did to the Jews trying to flee from Nazi Germany at the beginning of the Holocaust.

Also, back to the point. A holocaust could only have happened with a Statist nation like the US and Germany and not an Anarchist society.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.