Hey Goodnewsman, you sure did read a whole lot in my post that doesn't exist. You want to try again? You asked a question and Scripture answers your question quite well, yet you responded by suggesting I throw the Bible on the floor. Your response exposes your preconceived judgments upon me and others because nowhere did I defend watching pornography. Try reading the Scripture rather than incorrectly reading into my posts.
Watching "Un-christian Porn" - protect your heart
- Thread starter Grace777x70
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
There is just one small point, if hyper-grace spread heresy, condemnation, easy believism, and oppose any real spiritual insight we bring, not surprisingly at this current point in time, we are only interested in talking about their heresy and why they believe it.
The truth is the questions are not being answered because this version of faith is simply wrong.
You believe heretical, possessed people are speaking from God when both their works and words are against the Lord.
I think that puts you 100% in their camp doomed to hell.
The truth is the questions are not being answered because this version of faith is simply wrong.
You believe heretical, possessed people are speaking from God when both their works and words are against the Lord.
I think that puts you 100% in their camp doomed to hell.
P
I think that may be a little strong,but I can not get a handle on their error.
Osas seems to be a requirement for them,but if challenged they meld it into hyperbolic criticism of offense that anyone would dare question their "foundation".
It seems like a 3 tiered modern day deception."(I will have to look into it further)
1osas
2 extend grace,leave out the "dying" of Paul,over react to a perceived negative,and march their doctrine down everyone's throat.
3 a question birthed out of the first 2. Did universalism use this for a foundation?
Osas seems to be a requirement for them,but if challenged they meld it into hyperbolic criticism of offense that anyone would dare question their "foundation".
It seems like a 3 tiered modern day deception."(I will have to look into it further)
1osas
2 extend grace,leave out the "dying" of Paul,over react to a perceived negative,and march their doctrine down everyone's throat.
3 a question birthed out of the first 2. Did universalism use this for a foundation?
This is very odd to me because it is the "opposite team" that I have seen consistently take offense, usually by saying they are being slandered, while the ones supposedly doing this slandering remain silent, kind of like sheep...and when I bring this point to attention, the stock answer seems to be: I am not slandering them because what I say is true but they are slandering me because what they say is a lie.
And it is also this "opposite team" that seems to be the one trying to forcefully cram doctrines down throats, following specific people into whatever thread they start and pushing their agenda, no matter the topic of the thread.
It's bizarre...
And it is also this "opposite team" that seems to be the one trying to forcefully cram doctrines down throats, following specific people into whatever thread they start and pushing their agenda, no matter the topic of the thread.
It's bizarre...