Calvinism vs. Arminianism: Good article

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,345
2,159
113
United Kingdom
You know that when Paul was stating that he was speaking of a before conversion state, he was not speaking of an after conversion state ???

This has been badly used to speak on people after they have become born again believers, but that is not what Paul was speaking about here !!!!

I must admit I have not heard anyone apply these verses to believers...what gave you that idea?
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
I never said that they obey God's voice, where did you get that from ???

I said unbelievers can choose to do good deeds !!!

I know of some unbelievers that are some of the nicest people you would come across, and they spend a lot of time helping and doing things for others in need.

However without Christ those good deeds are all for naught, and the Word of God says they are as filthy rags because they are not done in the faith and love of God !!!
This is where I disagree. Love is love. If an unbelieving person loves another because they are obeying GOD in their heart, it's no different than a believer doing the same thing. Filthy rags in the sense that it can't save them, but a good work is not filthy by any means.
 
K

KennethC

Guest
I must admit I have not heard anyone apply these verses to believers...what gave you that idea?
Because I have seen a few on here that have !!!
 
K

KennethC

Guest
This is where I disagree. Love is love. If an unbelieving person loves another because they are obeying GOD in their heart, it's no different than a believer doing the same thing. Filthy rags in the sense that it can't save them, but a good work is not filthy by any means.
Those good deeds would not matter if the person is not a believer, as that person will still end up in the same lake of fire as the other unbelievers no matter how good they were !!!

However when it comes to believers the Word of God does say and show we will be rewarded for those good deeds we do in the Lord.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
I just read the most bizarre thing on a reformed apologetics website. It was refuting synergism and said that we are able to do what GOD commands because he controls us and enables us. I can't wrap my head around this idea because these are two contradictory things. GOD enables us to do because we have free will, yet are unable, but he doesn't enable us in order to control our will. The bible is filled with examples of GOD enabling those with free will (yet without ability), but it is void of examples of GOD telling people to do things and then controlling their will to accomplish it. It seems that free will and ability are being conflated. Is this a common belief?
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
I just read the most bizarre thing on a reformed apologetics website. It was refuting synergism and said that we are able to do what GOD commands because he controls us and enables us. I can't wrap my head around this idea because these are two contradictory things. GOD enables us to do because we have free will, yet are unable, but he doesn't enable us in order to control our will. The bible is filled with examples of GOD enabling those with free will (yet without ability), but it is void of examples of GOD telling people to do things and then controlling their will to accomplish it. It seems that free will and ability are being conflated. Is this a common belief?
This same website says that regenerate man is too corrupt to do GOD's will of his own free will! Thus GOD must do his will through us by co-opting our will. I'm starting to get the picture. This is a totally gnostic idea. Gnostics believed that matter was totally corrupt; therefore it was impossible for the physical body do do anything good. This is little different from the reformed/Calvinist idea that the flesh is so depraved that a believer cannot do the will of GOD freely, i.e., through acts of his will; GOD must take control and do through us. This belief in total depravity (which really translates into total inability), IMO is the underlying factor that constrains the reformed/Calvinist mind to conflate free will with ability.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
Originally Posted by KennethCCalvin taught that falling away from the faith was impossible, but the Word of God says and shows in multiple places it is possible and will happen !!!
Fancy that. So did the gnostics.
So did the Lord Jesus Christ.

John 10:28-29
[SUP]28 [/SUP]And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
[SUP]29 [/SUP]My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.


Is the Lord Jesus a gnostic because He taught OSAS?

Is the Lord Jesus wrong for teaching this, as Kenneth says, because its against the 'Word of God'?


No and No. These are just labels from people with no understanding. It doesn't seem too difficult to understand what Eternal is or the word Never or how about 'no man is able'. Can't quite grasp it.

Romans 11:29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.

Ephesians 2:8-9

[SUP]8 [/SUP]For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
[SUP]9 [/SUP]Not of works, lest any man should boast.


Workers and legalists can't believe in OSAS. That would cause all their work to be of no consequence. It would cause their 'understanding' to crumble. There has to be some consequence for not doing all the works that legalists require. Right?
 
K

KennethC

Guest
So did the Lord Jesus Christ.

John 10:28-29
[SUP]28 [/SUP]And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
[SUP]29 [/SUP]My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.


Is the Lord Jesus a gnostic because He taught OSAS?

Is the Lord Jesus wrong for teaching this, as Kenneth says, because its against the 'Word of God'?


No and No. These are just labels from people with no understanding. It doesn't seem too difficult to understand what Eternal is or the word Never or how about 'no man is able'. Can't quite grasp it.

Romans 11:29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.

Ephesians 2:8-9

[SUP]8 [/SUP]For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
[SUP]9 [/SUP]Not of works, lest any man should boast.


Workers and legalists can't believe in OSAS. That would cause all their work to be of no consequence. It would cause their 'understanding' to crumble. There has to be some consequence for not doing all the works that legalists require. Right?


No He did not !!!

I think you need to go read Matthew 25, Luke 12, and especially Matthew 24:10-13 again !!!

There is multiple verses that speak on those that fall away or depart from the faith in the NT, multiple !!!

Jesus did not teach OSAS, that is a lie my friend started by Augustine and carried on by Calvin.

Jesus taught of believers that will be cast away because of being disobedient servants.............


The Calvin and Augustine teaching of eternal security does not align with God's Word, as God's word says only those who continue to abide in Christ (faith) will receive eternal life.

There is no eternal life outside of Christ, nor any security of it !!!
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,431
0
There is a way to lose your salvation ( as if it is "yours" that obtain it for you ).....but you have to be able to use a lot of imagination and have a very low opinion of our Lord's sacrifice and the integrity of our Father..( oh brother.. )

John 10:27-30 (NASB)
[SUP]27 [/SUP] "My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me;
[SUP]28 [/SUP] and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; andno one will snatch them out of My hand.
[SUP]29 [/SUP] "My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand.
[SUP]30 [/SUP] "I and the Father are one."

You have to be NOT a "no one"...so "no one" really means every one else but you.....:rolleyes:

All's you do is wrestle yourself out of Jesus' hand..then once you have Him beat..then you are ready to take on the Father. ( He's a little tougher but you will have experience now on how to pluck yourself out of His hand )

In order to scare Jesus and the Father first you must..I repeat MUST intimidate Them with your mighty power by verbally accusing Them....you can tell them that they lied when He said " I will never leave nor forsake you"

Then because you are in Christ...He is going to have to stop being a High Priest for you..( again God lied when He said He is a priest forever...)

His blood which He spilled for all sins that supposedly have been taken away..that has to stop too being efficacious ....Jesus has to stop being the Lamb of God.

Even in the Old Covenant the priest looked at the lamb for blemishes..not the guy who brought the sacrifice.. the Father looks at Jesus....He is our Lamb! He is spotless and blameless.

.."...as He is..so also are we in this world.."

It's all really ridiculous..our salvation is not based on us..it is based on Jesus and His finished work!..He is faithful and grace much more abounds around sin...it's just plain "spiritual ignorance that has gone to seed " to think of His perfect work and that somehow it revolves around us and what we do.

John 10:28 (NASB)
[SUP]28 [/SUP]and I "give" eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand.

Romans 5:17 (NASB)
[SUP]17 [/SUP] For if by the transgression of the one, death reigned through the one, much more those who receive the abundance of grace and of the "gift" of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.

Romans 11:29 (KJV)
[SUP]29 [/SUP] For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.

( Somehow some obscure passages of scripture that people take without looking at it in context nullifies all the vast proof of scriptures that speak otherwise of the integrity of God and HIs completed work....is it possible we have those scriptures interpreted wrong because we look through the wrong "lens"?...of course.. )
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
I just read the most bizarre thing on a reformed apologetics website. It was refuting synergism and said that we are able to do what GOD commands because he controls us and enables us. I can't wrap my head around this idea because these are two contradictory things. GOD enables us to do because we have free will, yet are unable, but he doesn't enable us in order to control our will. The bible is filled with examples of GOD enabling those with free will (yet without ability), but it is void of examples of GOD telling people to do things and then controlling their will to accomplish it. It seems that free will and ability are being conflated. Is this a common belief?
Ezekiel 36:27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.

People who are intent on somehow placing their own free will into the picture insisting that they are good, don't understand the spirit that is given.

It is not our spirit. It is His Holy Spirit. So if your free will is in control then you are somehow able to command God to accomplish your will.

That is completely against scripture. God does not conform to our will. We conform to His.

All of a sudden obedience is something entirely different than what the legalists think it is. Obedience is resting from your own work and understanding and putting Faith in Gods Work in you.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
No He did not !!!

I think you need to go read Matthew 25, Luke 12, and especially Matthew 24:10-13 again !!!

There is multiple verses that speak on those that fall away or depart from the faith in the NT, multiple !!!

Jesus did not teach OSAS, that is a lie my friend started by Augustine and carried on by Calvin.

Jesus taught of believers that will be cast away because of being disobedient servants.............


The Calvin and Augustine teaching of eternal security does not align with God's Word, as God's word says only those who continue to abide in Christ (faith) will receive eternal life.

There is no eternal life outside of Christ, nor any security of it !!!
What, exactly, is the Lord Jesus Christ saying in John 10:28-29????

What does eternal mean?

What does 'no man is able' mean?

What does never mean?
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
Ezekiel 36:27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.

People who are intent on somehow placing their own free will into the picture insisting that they are good, don't understand the spirit that is given.

It is not our spirit. It is His Holy Spirit. So if your free will is in control then you are somehow able to command God to accomplish your will.

That is completely against scripture. God does not conform to our will. We conform to His.

All of a sudden obedience is something entirely different than what the legalists think it is. Obedience is resting from your own work and understanding and putting Faith in Gods Work in you.
Free will is independent of good or bad. It's simply the GOD-given authority to choose. Every man has it. Unregenerate man may choose of his own free will to want to do GOD's will, but he lacks the ability to do so perfectly, if at all (Romans 7). Regenerate man receives the ability to do the good that he wills to do (Romans 8).

Jesus told his disciples that they would receive that ability to do GOD's will through the holy spirit. Men who have GOD's spirit are not bound by 'total depravity' to be slaves to sin.

But you will receive power [when] the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the farthest part of the earth.” Acts 1:8

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament

Power (δύναμις, dunamis)

Words of this stem all have the basic sense of ability or capability. dýnamai means a. “to be able” in a general sense, b. “to be able” with reference to the attitude that makes one able, hence sometimes “to will,” and c. (of things) “to be equivalent to,” “to count as,” “to signify.” dynatós means “one who has ability or power,” “one who is powerful”; the neuter adjective signifies “what is possible or practicable.” dynatéō means “to have great ability.” adýnatos means “one who has no ability or strength”; the noun tó adýnaton signifies “impossibility” and adýnatón esti “to be impossible.” adynatéō means “not to be able.” dýnamis, the most important word in the group, means “ability,” then “possibility,” then “power” both physical and intellectual or spiritual. dýnastēs has the sense of “one who can do something” and was early used for “ruler” (including God as ruler). dynamóō and endynamóō both mean “to give power,” “to make strong,” “to strengthen.”
 
Last edited:

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
I don't have to read everything somebody writes to be able to criticize what I do read.
but you certainly need to read a good deal before you can understand a man like Calvin. you are just playing with him. That shows you are not even considering he might be right,
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
but you certainly need to read a good deal before you can understand a man like Calvin. you are just playing with him. That shows you are not even considering he might be right,
Everything I've read about his conception of total depravity (and am now seeing in comments here from people who espouse his view) aligns with the gnostic idea of total depravity. I've asked for people to comment and prove me wrong, but no one has been able to do anything but impugn that I'm wrong for sundry weak reasons. I sense that people are feeling threatened by having the light shine on the nature of what Calvin really believed, but they are too weak in their knowledge about their own identical belief to be able to engage in reasonable discussion. The inherent contradictions of that belief are becoming too obvious.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Free will is independent of good or bad. It's simply the GOD-given authority to choose. Every man has it. Unregenerate man may choose of his own free will to want to do GOD's will, but he lacks the ability to do so perfectly, if at all (Romans 7). Regenerate man receives the ability to do the good that he wills to do (Romans 8).
rubbish. you have never even clearly thought abut it. 'free will' is never mentioned in the Bible. If it exists it is NEVER independent of good or bad, Most people never act other than their upbringing, environment and personal preferences. Do you call that free will? When is FREE will exercised? When the Holy Spirit drives men to obey God. But that is not free will either,


Jesus told his disciples that they would receive that ability to do GOD's will through the holy spirit. Men who have GOD's spirit are not bound by 'total depravity' to be slaves to sin.
Since when has that been FREE will.


But they do But you will receive power [when] the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the farthest part of the earth.” Acts 1:8
LOL since when has the power of the Holy Spirit been freewill>? you are muddled in your thinking,
 
Last edited:
S

sparkman

Guest
"In conformity, therefore, to the clear doctrine of Scripture, we assert by an admirable and immutable counsel, God is once for all determined who he would admit to salvation and whom he would condemn to destruction; even the fall of Adam and Eve with all of its consequences was ordained by the admirable counsel of God." John Calvin

Call it want you want, Calvin says God is the author of sin...every sin committed, as evil as man can get, is the admirable counsel of God at work. No thank you. You can have that God if you want him.

Actually that's not what it says. It was by God's permissive will that sin exists, though. The fact that he gave mankind the ability to sin is proof of that. He isn't the AUTHOR of sin, but he does allow it to continue.

You can twist the words if you want, though..Arminians and Pelagians are good at that.
 
S

sparkman

Guest
Romans 10:9King James Version (KJV)

"That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."

According to the plain words of the Bible, which comes first: believing or salvation? Has a man ever been saved before believing? Was that man saved before the foundation of the world? Thou shalt be saved, not thou hast been saved.
Regeneration precedes faith in the Calvinist view. Faith follows salvation. I am not sure what your point would be...it's incoherent. If you're trying to say Calvinists believe they are saved prior to faith, you're conveying error. The elect are predestined to salvation, but they are not saved until they place their faith in Jesus Christ.

Caricatures are not appreciated.

Let me torch that strawman for you :)
 

Attachments

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Everything I've read about his conception of total depravity (and am now seeing in comments here from people who espouse his view) aligns with the gnostic idea of total depravity.
rubbish you don't even know the difference between gnostic teaching and the Calvinistic view of total depravity, But then you have probably read neither.

I've asked for people to comment and prove me wrong, but no one has been able to do anything but impugn that I'm wrong for sundry weak reasons. I sense that people are feeling threatened by having the light shine on the nature of what Calvin really believed, but they are too weak in their knowledge about their own identical belief to be able to engage in reasonable discussion. The inherent contradictions of that belief are becoming too obvious.
coming from someone who has never read him that's funny
 
S

sparkman

Guest
Generally speaking, unregenerate man's will isn't entirely free from sin, neither is it entirely in bondage to it. So he has a measure of free will. Regenerate man has free will.
His will is constrained by his nature. Since his nature is corrupt, his actions reflect the corruption. Same with believers. Their will is constrained by their nature. Since their nature is regenerate, their actions reflect the regenerate heart.

Argue with that; argue with the Bible. Scripture clearly teaches that the unsaved are slaves to sin, and that the righteous do good because of the regenerate nature. A good tree bears good fruit; a bad tree bears bad fruit.
 
S

sparkman

Guest
I take the first part of this back. Both unregenerate and regenerate people have entirely free will. In either case, whether they sin or do good deeds it's an act of their will.
This is a Pelagian view. Autonomous free will basically makes man sovereign.

Mankind does not have autonomous free will. His free will is subject to God's sovereign will.

Do you seriously think that your will trumps God's will?

Mankind is like a fish swimming in a pond. It can freely swim within the pond, but it can't decide to jump out of the pond and live on land. Our free will is subject to parameters that God assigns.

Pelagians and Arminians make a big deal out of autonomous free will but there's no such thing.

This is why I consider extreme Arminians and Pelagians to be idolaters. They reject God's sovereignty and make themselves the center of their universe. It's nothing but idolatry.