E
Well, if you need direct Scriptural evidence as to whether the Book of Mormon is legit or not, devoid of human bias, go with what it says in the book of Galatians 1:8-9, in which Paul states:
"[SUP]8 [/SUP]But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. [SUP]9 [/SUP]As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed."
Now an interesting fact to note here about the Book of Mormon is that it usually contains a subtitle on the cover in gold calling itself "Another Testament of Jesus Christ." By definition, the Book of Mormon calling itself another testament of Jesus Christ would automatically mean that it defines itself as "another Gospel" other than the Gospel originally revealed to the disciples. I'll let you figure out the rest by common logic.
Also, remember that just because people from another faith, or even a similar faith, may have a lot of good traits in their practice - this does not mean they are necessarily right about anything. On a few other notes, the Book of Mormon makes several elaborate claims which are quite frankly mythical in quality. A few of these include the idea that the American Indians came to the Americas on a second ark, that Joseph Smith transcribed the Book of Mormon from Golden Tablets with Mystical Glasses, and that Polygamy and racism against blacks was permitted under God's Law (early Mormons under Joseph Smith practiced both frequently).
Given all of that, and the fact that there is virtually zero archaeological evidence to back up the stories of the Book of Mormon, yet literally thousands to back up the Bible, it seems dubious that it could even conceivably come close to a true Revelation. Lastly, a lot of the Book of Mormon was copied (i.e. plagiarized) directly from the Old King James Version (about 1/3 of it I think). Fishy? Coincidence? Hmm...
"[SUP]8 [/SUP]But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. [SUP]9 [/SUP]As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed."
Now an interesting fact to note here about the Book of Mormon is that it usually contains a subtitle on the cover in gold calling itself "Another Testament of Jesus Christ." By definition, the Book of Mormon calling itself another testament of Jesus Christ would automatically mean that it defines itself as "another Gospel" other than the Gospel originally revealed to the disciples. I'll let you figure out the rest by common logic.
Also, remember that just because people from another faith, or even a similar faith, may have a lot of good traits in their practice - this does not mean they are necessarily right about anything. On a few other notes, the Book of Mormon makes several elaborate claims which are quite frankly mythical in quality. A few of these include the idea that the American Indians came to the Americas on a second ark, that Joseph Smith transcribed the Book of Mormon from Golden Tablets with Mystical Glasses, and that Polygamy and racism against blacks was permitted under God's Law (early Mormons under Joseph Smith practiced both frequently).
Given all of that, and the fact that there is virtually zero archaeological evidence to back up the stories of the Book of Mormon, yet literally thousands to back up the Bible, it seems dubious that it could even conceivably come close to a true Revelation. Lastly, a lot of the Book of Mormon was copied (i.e. plagiarized) directly from the Old King James Version (about 1/3 of it I think). Fishy? Coincidence? Hmm...